The phrase "never sit your studs" seems to only apply for skill position players for FF.
Where do we draw the line here? PIT DST for example has been top 5 pretty much all season. We saw them get shredded by NE this past week, but their following schedule is as follows:
w11: OAK
w12: @BUF
w13: @BAL
w14: CIN
w15: NYJ
w16: CAR
I see favorable matchups @ BUF, vs CIN, and vs CAR, but what about w11, w13, and w15? (I'm not asking for advice, I'm simply using an above average DST as an example here).
I guess the rule of thumb is DSTs playing 1) at home and 2) against a bad QB.
How can one determine whether to play roulette with teams like; CLE, OAK, DET, IND, or NE who can possibly be on waivers with some better matchups? Why do you never sit your stud skill players but sometimes sit your DST in playoffs for favorable matchups?
Where do we draw the line here? PIT DST for example has been top 5 pretty much all season. We saw them get shredded by NE this past week, but their following schedule is as follows:
w11: OAK
w12: @BUF
w13: @BAL
w14: CIN
w15: NYJ
w16: CAR
I see favorable matchups @ BUF, vs CIN, and vs CAR, but what about w11, w13, and w15? (I'm not asking for advice, I'm simply using an above average DST as an example here).
I guess the rule of thumb is DSTs playing 1) at home and 2) against a bad QB.
How can one determine whether to play roulette with teams like; CLE, OAK, DET, IND, or NE who can possibly be on waivers with some better matchups? Why do you never sit your stud skill players but sometimes sit your DST in playoffs for favorable matchups?