nirad3
Footballguy
Right, my bad. The linked article that you had glowing words about.It wasn't my link, but I did call into question its veracity
Right, my bad. The linked article that you had glowing words about.It wasn't my link, but I did call into question its veracity
I wonder how you come to the conclusion that Coleman is a much better athlete and is multiple steps faster. All we have is that Coleman ran a 4.40 at his pro day and Williams ran a 4.42 at his(4.41 at the combine). The 10'5 broad jump, 35" vert, and 4.19 shuttle are pretty good marks by Williams. If Coleman had tested, I would have expected similar numbers in the broad jump and vertical. Williams' shuttle surprised me, because changing directions didn't seem like a strength; I doubt Coleman would have bested that number, since it's not at strength for him either. Given they are virtually the same size, I'd say Williams compares very well to Coleman.One thing I disagree with on Joe Williams is the notion that he fills the Tevin Coleman role in Shanahan's offense. I disagree for 2 reasons:
1. Coleman is a much better athlete than Williams, he's multiple steps faster, which isn't a knock on Williams and more an asset that Coleman has.
2. I'm not sure that role exists for anyone other than Tevin Coleman in Atlanta's offense. Kyle Shanahan has roughly a decade of play calling experience, from Houston to Washington to Cleveland to finally Atlanta. None of those other stops had a guy in a role like Coleman's, and 2 of those stops had a guy with Carlos Hyde's size(Foster, Morris) handling tons of work. Morris ceded 3rd down work, and a handful of carries to Roy Helu, and that is a fair expectation for Williams in my opinion.
If (big if as always) Hyde stays healthy, I'd be shocked if Williams got more than 30% of the workload. Hyde is a FAR greater runner than Williams (Hyde is a top-10 in the NFL runner) and I highly doubt the 2017 49ers will look anything like the 2016 Falcons, its just not realistic. Williams feels like fool's gold to me. Maybe worth a handcuff to Hyde owners, but not somebody I'd even consider a top-60 dynasty RB at the moment. Honestly, I think he may have more redraft value than dynasty value, since he could easily be replaced by an even higher pick if/when Hyde leaves.
I agree with most of this, but for point 2, how do you factor in that (supposedly) Shanahan pounded the table for him and convinced them to not only put him back on their board but to trade up to get him? He may not be good enough to handle it, but it certainly seems like Shanahan at least plans on using him in his offense.One thing I disagree with on Joe Williams is the notion that he fills the Tevin Coleman role in Shanahan's offense. I disagree for 2 reasons:
1. Coleman is a much better athlete than Williams, he's multiple steps faster, which isn't a knock on Williams and more an asset that Coleman has.
2. I'm not sure that role exists for anyone other than Tevin Coleman in Atlanta's offense. Kyle Shanahan has roughly a decade of play calling experience, from Houston to Washington to Cleveland to finally Atlanta. None of those other stops had a guy in a role like Coleman's, and 2 of those stops had a guy with Carlos Hyde's size(Foster, Morris) handling tons of work. Morris ceded 3rd down work, and a handful of carries to Roy Helu, and that is a fair expectation for Williams in my opinion.
If (big if as always) Hyde stays healthy, I'd be shocked if Williams got more than 30% of the workload. Hyde is a FAR greater runner than Williams (Hyde is a top-10 in the NFL runner) and I highly doubt the 2017 49ers will look anything like the 2016 Falcons, its just not realistic. Williams feels like fool's gold to me. Maybe worth a handcuff to Hyde owners, but not somebody I'd even consider a top-60 dynasty RB at the moment. Honestly, I think he may have more redraft value than dynasty value, since he could easily be replaced by an even higher pick if/when Hyde leaves.
Looks like he got added overnight. Threw in a bid in my Zealots league, why the hell not?Breida not in the MFL database?
They had zero depth behind Hyde and still didn't draft a RB until round 4. Shanahan probably would have pounded the table for just about anyone at that point.I agree with most of this, but for point 2, how do you factor in that (supposedly) Shanahan pounded the table for him and convinced them to not only put him back on their board but to trade up to get him? He may not be good enough to handle it, but it certainly seems like Shanahan at least plans on using him in his offense.
Midway through the sixth round, San Francisco called again. Over 13 minutes — the longest call of the day — the 49ers made their pitch.
They told Breida about the two-back system the coaching staff previously used in Atlanta with Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman. Even though they drafted Utah's Joe Williams in the fourth round, he's a bigger back. They needed a speedy one. They needed Breida. If another team offered a better signing bonus, they'd match it.
"I'm right there with you," Breida said. "I just want to go play."
If the articles are true, Shanahan certainly seemed to specifically target Williams. If they just wanted "a body", they wouldn't have traded up.kutta said:They had zero depth behind Hyde and still didn't draft a RB until round 4. Shanahan probably would have pounded the table for just about anyone at that point.
They also traded for Kapri Bibbs. In fact they traded for Bibbs before they traded up to draft Williams as far as the chronological order of their actions to add RB players who fit their system.If the articles are true, Shanahan certainly seemed to specifically target Williams. If they just wanted "a body", they wouldn't have traded up.
I own Hyde as well, but IMO it's wishful thinking to believe that they don't plan on getting him involved- I'm just hoping he isn't very good.
The trade for Bibbs wasThey moved pick Nos. 143 (Round 4) and 161 (Round 5) to Indianapolis for pick 121 less than an hour after announcing a trade for Broncos reserve running back Kapri Bibbs.
You're a riot man. Anyone who doesn't see things your way is "obtuse".Some of you are fairly obtuse on this issue. I'm an OSU fan and a staunch defender of Carlos Hyde but if you don't think Shanahans system doesn't make him replaceable I don't think you've paid attention to the NFL for the past 20 years. Williams has ease of access to a starting spot, elite athleticism and in a tried and true system. I would much rather be taking a chance on a back in a Shanahan system then a lot of other places.
Sure Joe will be involved. The question is the split, not whether one will get all the carries. Heck, I don't want hyde to get all the carries.If the articles are true, Shanahan certainly seemed to specifically target Williams. If they just wanted "a body", they wouldn't have traded up.
I own Hyde as well, but IMO it's wishful thinking to believe that they don't plan on getting him involved- I'm just hoping he isn't very good.
The vast majority of RBs, players for that matter, in the league are replaceable. When the time comes, I think hyde is the guy, at least for 17.Some of you are fairly obtuse on this issue. I'm an OSU fan and a staunch defender of Carlos Hyde but if you don't think Shanahans system doesn't make him replaceable I don't think you've paid attention to the NFL for the past 20 years. Williams has ease of access to a starting spot, elite athleticism and in a tried and true system. I would much rather be taking a chance on a back in a Shanahan system then a lot of other places.
No RB gets all of the carries, I'm saying it's pretty clear that they plan on getting Williams more involved than a typical back-up RB.Sure Joe will be involved. The question is the split, not whether one will get all the carries. Heck, I don't want hyde to get all the carries.
Going to be Debbie Downer here, but 24 years old is a buzzkill for me as it relates to his prospects. He could throw out a few Coleman like years as part of a committee, but I think those expecting anything more will result in disappointment.
Williams turns 24 in September, so he'll play his rookie year at 24. Some guy named David Johnson turned 24 in December of his rookie year.While I understand the sentiment, especially when this chatter is likely geared towards the dynasty angle, does this really matter? The average NFL career lasts 3.5 years. Say the guy - since he was hand-picked by Shanahan himself - is a Tevin Coleman type right out of the gates. So what if he's 24?
Coleman was RB13 in per-game average in PPR formats last year. Is there anyone in here expecting more out of Williams? I would be tickled pink if I owned him and that was his ceiling.
Carlos Hyde is part of the old regime and comes with injury baggage. Williams was hand-picked by the current regime. Not saying that automatically means Hyde is nothing and Williams is the starter or even the lead back in a committee, but I think that a timeshare is certainly plausible and if Williams achieves top-15 PPR status by the time he's 25-26, well then that'd be awesome.
Disclaimer: I don't own Williams in any leagues.
Guess who else turned 24 as a rookie? Some guy named Devante Booker. What's his value look like as a 25 year old 2nd year player that didn't capitalize immediately when the opportunity presented itself? Not good, and a whole lot worse than the typical 22-23 year old 2nd year player with the same resume.Williams turns 24 in September, so he'll play his rookie year at 24. Some guy named David Johnson turned 24 in December of his rookie year.
I hope everyone traded that guy for being too old already...
24 year old rookie looked good tonight...7 carries for 60 yards, an 8.57 per-carry avg.Guess who else turned 24 as a rookie? Some guy named Devante Booker. What's his value look like as a 25 year old 2nd year player that didn't capitalize immediately when the opportunity presented itself? Not good, and a whole lot worse than the typical 22-23 year old 2nd year player with the same resume.
Clearly some old rookie RBs can pan out as you've indicated (though I'd say 3rd vs 4th round isn't an immaterial gap for RB pedigree), the risk is that they don't carry the developmental upside of a similar RB prospect that's 2-3 years younger. Thus if the old rookie swings and misses, his value plummets instantly.
Best of luck with the Williams lottery ticket.
24 year old rookie looked good tonight...7 carries for 60 yards, an 8.57 per-carry avg.
https://twitter.com/1SportsOutlet/status/896217567907414016
A few of his runs...
\https://twitter.com/ahills101/status/896226752367796224
He actually looks a little strange running. Not sure what it is, but he looks odd.24 year old rookie looked good tonight...7 carries for 60 yards, an 8.57 per-carry avg.
https://twitter.com/1SportsOutlet/status/896217567907414016
A few of his runs...
\https://twitter.com/ahills101/status/896226752367796224
He runs like Forrest Gump. He as an upright upper body and runs with high knees.He actually looks a little strange running. Not sure what it is, but he looks odd.
I was thinking he kind of looked like a hairy sasquatch while running.He runs like Forrest Gump. He as an upright upper body and runs with high knees.
You know noone's really trying that hard in preseason games, right?24 year old rookie looked good tonight...7 carries for 60 yards, an 8.57 per-carry avg.
https://twitter.com/1SportsOutlet/status/896217567907414016
A few of his runs...
\https://twitter.com/ahills101/status/896226752367796224
Yeah, none of those guys are playing for a job or anything.You know noone's really trying that hard in preseason games, right?
Sure. Most of those guys would much rather get factory jobs anyway.You know noone's really trying that hard in preseason games, right?
The ones playing for a job aren't very good (relatively speaking). The ones who have a job don't try because they don't want to get hurt. Preseason games, especially week 1 are as meaningless as if they played a game of cornhole at the 50 yard line. Maybe week 3 games have a little bit of meaning but making observations on anything else is a waste of time.Yeah, none of those guys are playing for a job or anything.
You know noone's really trying that hard in preseason games, right?
That was just luck. I'm sure you made a lot of other observations that were wrong.Not many years ago I saw a kid named A Brown look great in week 1. My observation wasnt a waste of time that day
That was just luck. I'm sure you made a lot of other observations that were wrong.
In the event Hyde misses time (which is admittedly likely) I'm not so sure anyone is going to dominate touches in this backfield. Hightower is still technically #2 on the depth chart and Brieda still saw work ahead of Williams.Preseason shmeseason J Will showed impressive burst and decisiveness. He'll be a nice play those 3-4 weeks Hyde misses.
You'll be more impressed.I thought Williams looked good but the runs I saw there was nothing but open turf for 10+ yards, I'm sure I did not see all his runs. Not going to take away what he did but I would wait and see how he looks during tough sledding.
He isn't a "lottery ticket." He's the best running back on the team.In the event Hyde misses time (which is admittedly likely) I'm not so sure anyone is going to dominate touches in this backfield. Hightower is still technically #2 on the depth chart and Brieda still saw work ahead of Williams.
Williams undoubtedly looked good, but the situation isn't great. At best I could see him splitting reps and since he doesn't offer much in the pass catching/blocking department, the fact that SF will find themselves in a fair amount of negative game scripts makes me think his upside is limited even if Hyde were to go down. He's not a top priority for me as far as lottery tickets are concerned.
Right.. being the best RB on a team and being considered a lottery ticket are not mutually exclusive propositions.He isn't a "lottery ticket." He's the best running back on the team.
Would a "scalded dog" be an apt description?He actually looks a little strange running. Not sure what it is, but he looks odd.
Then why is he 3rd on the depth chart?TripItUp said:He isn't a "lottery ticket." He's the best running back on the team.
Joe Williams managed 16 yards on seven carries and caught his lone target for a gain of 11 in the 49ers' third preseason game.
Williams ran behind Carlos Hyde, Matt Breida, and Raheem Mostert as Tim Hightower took the night off. Williams' August has been mostly quiet since he ripped off 34- and 17-yard gains in the 49ers' preseason opener. Williams is still likely to make the 53, but he is in danger of not having an early-season role.
lol I'd argue fantasy wise he is likely 5th this year behind Hyde, Hightower, Breida, and Kyle J. He may be a guy for the future but he isn't going to do anything this seasonThen why is he 3rd on the depth chart?
He might prove to be the best RB on the team (though I doubt it, Hyde is a very good RB-he just can't stay healthy), but you state this as if it were a fact, when it's not, at least not yet.
Best back on the team, eh? He's currently being outplayed by a guy named Raheem Mostert.He isn't a "lottery ticket." He's the best running back on the team.
That says about all you need to know. :( Sadly, Mostert may be a roster casualty in favor of Joe Williams based almost solely on the Niners' draft investment, despite the fact that Mostert brings even more speed than Williams and is a solid contributor on special teams.Best back on the team, eh? He's currently being outplayed by a guy named Raheem Mostert.
Way too premature to think like this.lol I'd argue fantasy wise he is likely 5th this year behind Hyde, Hightower, Breida, and Kyle J. He may be a guy for the future but he isn't going to do anything this season
agree to disagree, season starts next week and he hasn't done a thing to move up the depth chartWay too premature to think like this.
So the depth chart doesn't change before 2018?agree to disagree, season starts next week and he hasn't done a thing to move up the depth chart
I said he would be 5th this season, not next. Other than injury I don't see much of an opportunity for a guy in this office that can't block or catch. Just an opinion but seems like the coach has also cooled on him since he is also the OC and the man determining the depth chartHankmoody said:So the depth chart doesn't change before 2018?