Sabertooth
Footballguy
I play in a Start 2 QB dynasty league so obviously the quarterback position is paramount to success. So guys like Newton, Gabbert, and Dalton are in play right off the bat. So I'm really trying to do my diligence on the quarterbacks from this class.
I noticed a couple of things when looking at drafthistory.com
QBs taken in the first round since 2004. Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, JP Losman, Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers, Jason Campbell, Vince Young, Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler, Jamarcus Russell, Brady Quinn, Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman, Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow.
First, quarterbacks are judged pretty accurately, especially when taken in the first round. By my quick and probably flawed (that's why we have discussions) estimation, we have 19 quarterbacks taken in the first round since 2004. Only 20% are pure busts. Losman, Leinart, Russell, Quinn. That's it. And two came in the same season, a year when Kevin Kolb is the only guy that is starting right now. So just a bad crop there.
Secondly, quarterbacks selected in the first will generate some stats. They get their shot. This may seem intuitive and probably is. They get a chance to show their ability in game situations. Usually within the first year and always within the first two years. Many can argue that guys like Smith were thrown in too early, but here he sits 6 years later atop the depth chart. Campbell is another one. He isn't great, but there he sits.
Third, you are most likely to get your stud quarterbacks in the first round. Period. This list is loaded with pro bowlers and playoff winners. 3 of them are super bowl champs. If you go back further, Vick, Peyton, Palmer are three more #1 overall guys that had a ton of success.
Quarterbacks are as good a bet as there is to find your future gems. I went into this research expecting to find that QBs are generally groomed and they will not help you right away. But in 2QB league, where scarcity is higher, they can help you with depth right away, and they are a much better bet than RB and WR to be future studs.
I noticed a couple of things when looking at drafthistory.com
QBs taken in the first round since 2004. Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, JP Losman, Alex Smith, Aaron Rodgers, Jason Campbell, Vince Young, Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler, Jamarcus Russell, Brady Quinn, Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman, Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow.
First, quarterbacks are judged pretty accurately, especially when taken in the first round. By my quick and probably flawed (that's why we have discussions) estimation, we have 19 quarterbacks taken in the first round since 2004. Only 20% are pure busts. Losman, Leinart, Russell, Quinn. That's it. And two came in the same season, a year when Kevin Kolb is the only guy that is starting right now. So just a bad crop there.
Secondly, quarterbacks selected in the first will generate some stats. They get their shot. This may seem intuitive and probably is. They get a chance to show their ability in game situations. Usually within the first year and always within the first two years. Many can argue that guys like Smith were thrown in too early, but here he sits 6 years later atop the depth chart. Campbell is another one. He isn't great, but there he sits.
Third, you are most likely to get your stud quarterbacks in the first round. Period. This list is loaded with pro bowlers and playoff winners. 3 of them are super bowl champs. If you go back further, Vick, Peyton, Palmer are three more #1 overall guys that had a ton of success.
Quarterbacks are as good a bet as there is to find your future gems. I went into this research expecting to find that QBs are generally groomed and they will not help you right away. But in 2QB league, where scarcity is higher, they can help you with depth right away, and they are a much better bet than RB and WR to be future studs.