Tronic Son
Footballguy
I traded for Tate in my dynasty league hoping for this. Anyone know what his contract details are? Would it benifit Houston to do this?
I'll take the under.
You sign Foster and continue with a 70:30 split in an attempt to keep both RBs healthy, and insurance in case one gets hurt.Oh, and also...So it looks like he's under contract for $500k through 2013. Foster is a restricted free agent next year. He'll want $8 to $10 million most likely. What would you do? I would put out a tender of $25 over four years for foster, let him go somewhere else. Take the draft pick/picks and run with Tate for the next two years. Wishful thinking I know. But possible yes? Tate is just too talented to be a backup.
Nfl coaches and GMs don't care about fantasy football.
I think the most likely scenario is that the Texans understand what they have in Matt Schaub (a glorified game manager who usually seems to do more overall harm than good to the team) and thus they go out of their way to ensure they keep all the pieces of their rushing attack that they possibly can, as that is their best recipe for success.I still think it is possible that Foster leaves in the offseason, but I think it is unlikely. I think it is essentially crazy talk to believe Tate will be leaving in any way in the offseason, as he won't be asking for any more money.So it looks like he's under contract for $500k through 2013. Foster is a restricted free agent next year. He'll want $8 to $10 million most likely. What would you do? I would put out a tender of $25 over four years for foster, let him go somewhere else. Take the draft pick/picks and run with Tate for the next two years. Wishful thinking I know. But possible yes? Tate is just too talented to be a backup.
RB who can score in the redzone and from 90yds out = high chance of winning.Lock Foster up.You can draft a guy to be in that 70:30 split with Tate. I'd rather have a $1 million backfield with Tate than an $11 million backfield with Foster and use that money on a dominant run stopper or a shutdown corner to play with Joseph. RB's are not as important as they used to be. And yes football teams don't care about FF but they do care about winning. More good players = More winning.
Tell that to the Titans.RB who can score in the redzone and from 90yds out = high chance of winning.Lock Foster up.You can draft a guy to be in that 70:30 split with Tate. I'd rather have a $1 million backfield with Tate than an $11 million backfield with Foster and use that money on a dominant run stopper or a shutdown corner to play with Joseph. RB's are not as important as they used to be. And yes football teams don't care about FF but they do care about winning. More good players = More winning.
Foster is the 70%--HTH. Letting your star offensive player leave for free agency to let a talented but oft-injured RB and a rookie control the running game is something that a competent GM won't let happen.You can draft a guy to be in that 70:30 split with Tate. I'd rather have a $1 million backfield with Tate than an $11 million backfield with Foster and use that money on a dominant run stopper or a shutdown corner to play with Joseph. RB's are not as important as they used to be. And yes football teams don't care about FF but they do care about winning. More good players = More winning.
Yet the backup for Houston consistently puts up better stats than the starter for Carolina. Not a knock on you (as the poster), just find it odd that Carolina does not run it down opponent's throats and then unleash the Newton.This is going to be similar to the Carolina RB situation imo. Neither are likely to go anywhere
This is going to be similar to the Carolina RB situation imo. Neither are likely to go anywhere
You beat me to it. You don't get much in trades for RBs anyway. They're kinda a dime a dozen with short careers.This is going to be similar to the Carolina RB situation imo. Neither are likely to go anywhere![]()
I'll take the under.
No, he isn't.Tate is just too talented to be a backup.
Why could it get ugly if they are franchised? You think they will turn down the franchise tag to hold out? I see franchise tags for RBs being the new norm.Foster rice and forte will all be franchised. Could get ugly next year drafting these guys early if they dont get a contract extension. 7 mil for a top rb fir 1 year...
I also believe it will be the new norm. However what would you rather have. Short term avg top back money or big money contract. I think it will take time for rbs to get used to it is all im saying. Forte is lookin for 15 mil plus, u think he is gonna be happy with half thatWhy could it get ugly if they are franchised? You think they will turn down the franchise tag to hold out? I see franchise tags for RBs being the new norm.Foster rice and forte will all be franchised. Could get ugly next year drafting these guys early if they dont get a contract extension. 7 mil for a top rb fir 1 year...
You're probably right about it taking time to change the mindset. RBs find themselves in the precarious position of being one of the most visible, popular, and important pieces of a football team while also being the most oft-injured, replaceable, and short lived of all the positions. Plus they're success if heavily dependent on the O-line in front of them. Just rarely makes sense to pay them well long term.I also believe it will be the new norm. However what would you rather have. Short term avg top back money or big money contract. I think it will take time for rbs to get used to it is all im saying. Forte is lookin for 15 mil plus, u think he is gonna be happy with half thatWhy could it get ugly if they are franchised? You think they will turn down the franchise tag to hold out? I see franchise tags for RBs being the new norm.Foster rice and forte will all be franchised. Could get ugly next year drafting these guys early if they dont get a contract extension. 7 mil for a top rb fir 1 year...
Portis for BaileyWhen was the last time a RB of note was traded?
Foster is an exclusive rights free agent, not a restircted one. As such, while he does not have a contract with the Texans following this season, he wil not be going anywhere (w/o the unlikely Texans sign and trade) nor is subject to franchise tags and such. Basically, the Texans can offer whatever they want (at least 3rd year minimium) and tell him to take it or leave it. What the likely situation is that the Texans and Foster reach some longer term contract that will take away his restricted year and a couple of free agent years. Houston having Ben Tate under control is a good thing for thier nego. side since they have a real and productive option.
As for Tate being traded, very doubtful (you know that %1 protection for something silly). Tate is not expensive and even with limited touches is useful as both a NFL player and FF one. All you really have to do is remember late pre-season/early regular season when the Texans went from silly depth to Ben OBGYN or silent G or whatever nicknamke for the guy starting with the Browns.
Not that this means anything a few months out, but Kubiak does not sound like a guy wanting to change how the running game is going.
http://www.houstontexans.com/news/article-2/Quotes-Kubiak-press-conference/2c1e03f7-4f88-4b3a-975e-13f3b3e205f3
(on the combo of running backs (RBs Arian Foster and Ben Tate) and their play) “It’s fun to watch right now. It’s almost like a competition because they just go back and forth. Arian pounds them and Ben comes in and Ben gives you a lot of speed. They’re a little bit different from that standpoint. Then (RB) Derrick (Ward) comes in at the end. Thankfully we got the fumble back, but he just runs hard. When you’ve got those guys competing like that it’s just making everybody else better. And it starts with the guys up front.”
ZEROI traded for Tate in my dynasty league hoping for this. Anyone know what his contract details are? Would it benifit Houston to do this?
:( ...I think we need a moment of silence for his careerWhy even ask this seeing years of Jonathan Strewart get wasted. :(