What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

ESPN reports Garrard to Start Sunday (1 Viewer)

JohnnyCat

Footballguy
link

In a move that is certain to stir speculation about the direction of the team's future at quarterback, ESPN.com has learned that backup David Garrard, who took most of the snaps for the Jacksonville Jaguars this week, will start in Sunday's game at Philadelphia, replacing injured Byron Leftwich.

Leftwich, who is battling a sprained left ankle, did not practice Friday for a second straight day. He split the snaps with Garrard on Wednesday, then tossed his shoulder pads to the ground during a stretching segment before the Thursday practice, when informed he would not work in the "team" portions of the session.

Coach Jack Del Rio said Friday that the status of the quarterbacks remains a game-time decision, and Leftwich still is listed as "questionable" on the official injury report. But while both quarterbacks said Thursday they did not know who would play in Philadelphia, sources said Garrard already had been apprised he will be the starter.

A fifth-year veteran, Garrard has started eight games in his career, with a 5-3 record. He started the final five contests in 2005, while Leftwich was sidelined by a fractured left ankle, and posted a 4-1 record. The current ankle problem that Leftwich is experiencing is not related to last year's fracture, the Jaguars said.

The sore ankle flared up late last week, without warning, and nearly cost Leftwich last Sunday's start against the Houston Texans. The Jaguars lost at Houston 27-7, falling to a disappointing 3-3 for the year. Leftwich played the entire game and performed unevenly, completing 14 of 28 passes for 125 yards, with no touchdown passes, no interceptions and a passer rating of 62.4.

Del Rio initially said after the Houston game that he did not feel the ankle was a big factor in Leftwich's performance, but then changed his mind after reviewing the videotape. On Wednesday, he decided that, with the ankle not showing improvement, the quarterbacks would share the snaps with the No. 1 offense.

What makes the decision to go with Garrard a tough one is that there are suspicions that some in the Jags organization don't feel Leftwich is the long-term answer. The switch this weekend, even if only for medical reasons, will further fuel speculation along those lines. Some will see the ankle injury as a convenient excuse to bench Leftwich and evaluate Garrard.

Del Rio may have no other agenda than wanting a more mobile quarterback in the lineup against an Eagles defense that boasts an NFL-high 25 sacks. But he will have trouble selling such a rationale to Leftwich and some others.

Leftwich is a fierce competitor, a guy with a reputation for playing hurt, and he apparently was less than 100 percent physically for much longer than anyone knew, since he now traces the ankle injury to the Oct. 1 game at Washington. The fourth-year veteran, one of the league's best players to deal with and a candid guy whose emotions are usually dangling from his sleeve, is also a player who feels that he has earned the right to consider the Jaguars his team.

The team's first-round pick in the 2003 draft, Leftwich is signed only through the 2007 season. Garrard signed a contract extension in 2005, bypassing the prospect of unrestricted free agency in the spring of '06, that runs through the 2008 season.

Leftwich, 26, took over as the Jags' starter early in the 2003 season. For his career, the former Marshall star has completed 789 of 1,344 passes for 9,042 yards, with 51 touchdown passes, 36 interceptions and a passer rating of 80.5. He has compiled a 24-20 record as a starter.
 
The question is what does this do for the WRs values this week vs the Eagles? Who's going to be the top target for Garrad?

 
Any impact on the Jags RB rotation?

1) Freedy T sees more action because Del Rio needs to lean more on a veteran presence?

2) Jones-Drew sees more action because the offense clicks better with a Garrard/Jones-Drew combo?

Any perspectives on the Jags philosophy from those in the know?

I watch a decent amount of JAX game action on Sunday Ticket and personally think that game flow situation plays out better for Freddy if Garrard starts, but that's only a gut instinct.

 
At the risk of being re-directed to the AC Forum ... would you guys drop Leftwich for Garrard (I have Kitna on a bye). Sorry, didn't have the energy to cleverly disguise that question so it would fit in the Shark Pool :whistle:

 
Garrard is a much better passer than Leftowich.

Personally, I think the offense has performed much better overall also when Garrard is under center. There is a reason Leftowich doesn't want to come off the field.

Can anyone say "Wally Pip". :yes:

PS I would say this is bad for the Eagles D

 
Well, I've gotta start him in one league. After looking @ his #s from the end of last season, he was decent.

He went 5-1 and averaged (around not exact) 15-30 for 220 or so. With 3 rush tds in 6 games. Only 4 pass TDs though. :mellow:

PHI will score, so I'm guessing Del Rio will be forced to play catch up and let DG pass more than he'd like to. Guessing 18-32 for 200 and 1 passing w/ one rushing score and 2 ints.

 
Garrard is a much better passer than Leftowich.

Personally, I think the offense has performed much better overall also when Garrard is under center. There is a reason Leftowich doesn't want to come off the field.

Can anyone say "Wally Pip". :yes:

PS I would say this is bad for the Eagles D
Have you seen these two play for an extended period of time? I'm pretty sure that you haven't.
 
Has the Vegas line changed at all since this change was announced? That is always a good indicator as to what the perception is as to whom is perceived to be the more effective starter.

My hunch would be that the line has held steady. I don't see much difference in the Jags with either guy in. Leftwich passes better, but Gerrard is more of a threat with his feet. It evens out.

 
Garrard is a much better passer than Leftowich.

Personally, I think the offense has performed much better overall also when Garrard is under center. There is a reason Leftowich doesn't want to come off the field.

Can anyone say "Wally Pip". :yes:

PS I would say this is bad for the Eagles D
Have you seen these two play for an extended period of time? I'm pretty sure that you haven't.
pre-season was only 8 weeks ago, so yes, I have seen him play recently. :yes: My opinion is he reads the field better than Leftowich. And that is acknowledging Leftowich's improvement in the passing game this year.

We shall see in the end, but I feel Garrard tends to lead his recievers to open areas with a catchable ball, as opposed to Leftowich who tends to drill the ball into the receivers chest with fastballs.

This isn't a slam on Leftowich as much as a backing of Garrard.

IMO you will see the YAC go up for Jacksonville as a team, which is going to improve that offense.

I also expect to see the Jaguar D put on the field more, which could be good or bad for the defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I've gotta start him in one league. After looking @ his #s from the end of last season, he was decent.He went 5-1 and averaged (around not exact) 15-30 for 220 or so. With 3 rush tds in 6 games. Only 4 pass TDs though. :mellow: PHI will score, so I'm guessing Del Rio will be forced to play catch up and let DG pass more than he'd like to. Guessing 18-32 for 200 and 1 passing w/ one rushing score and 2 ints.
What happened to Taylor's numbers last year when Garrard was in?
 
Byron Leftwich (out, ankle) and Jaguars head coach Jack Del Rio are currently not on speaking terms.

Leftwich was reportedly nowhere to be found at practice Friday. Del Rio isn't speaking to the media either. David Garrard will be Jacksonville's starting quarterback against Philadelphia in Week 8.

Source: Florida Times Union/ RotoWorld

 
Byron Leftwich (out, ankle) and Jaguars head coach Jack Del Rio are currently not on speaking terms.Leftwich was reportedly nowhere to be found at practice Friday. Del Rio isn't speaking to the media either. David Garrard will be Jacksonville's starting quarterback against Philadelphia in Week 8.Source: Florida Times Union/ RotoWorld
Hmm. That sounds like a reaction reserved for more than a week off. How accurate are these guys?
 
From what I remember of Garrard's games last season, the Jags seemed to be a more balanced offense with Garrard in the game. Can anyone confirm / deny this? It seemed as if the run / pass split was more even, whereas the Jags seem to be much more run oriented with Leftwich in the game.

It could be system related rather than personnel related, though, as I think Leftwich is a very capable QB.

 
Well, I've gotta start him in one league. After looking @ his #s from the end of last season, he was decent.

He went 5-1 and averaged (around not exact) 15-30 for 220 or so. With 3 rush tds in 6 games. Only 4 pass TDs though. :mellow:

PHI will score, so I'm guessing Del Rio will be forced to play catch up and let DG pass more than he'd like to. Guessing 18-32 for 200 and 1 passing w/ one rushing score and 2 ints.
What happened to Taylor's numbers last year when Garrard was in?
Jags 2005 scheduleNov 27th (AZ) on

 
Philly has the most overrated defense in football. 21 ppg, middle-of-the-pack against the run, middle-of-the-pack overall, horrible against the pass.

Going by the hype, you'd think they were top-10 across the board.

 
Philly has the most overrated defense in football. 21 ppg, middle-of-the-pack against the run, middle-of-the-pack overall, horrible against the pass.Going by the hype, you'd think they were top-10 across the board.
Does the 21 points per game that the "defense" gives up include the two Rhonde Barber interception returns and the DeMarcus Ware fumble return TD? If it does, that stat is horse####.I don't think there's a ton of hype about Philly's defense. No one is saying they are the Bears or Ravens. They have a decent defense, probably around tenth best in the league.Very good pass rush, decent against the run, and vulnerable to a good passing team at times.I don't recall anyone saying otherwise.
 
Philly has the most overrated defense in football. 21 ppg, middle-of-the-pack against the run, middle-of-the-pack overall, horrible against the pass.Going by the hype, you'd think they were top-10 across the board.
I'm not sure who's been overrating the Eagles exactly... I don't hear anyone touting them. Their defense has been their strongpoint the last few years so maybe people were expecting more from them. They have had to deal with their fair share of injuries, and should play better the following weeks with the return of Hood and Lito. Despite their lackluster pass and run D, they still have a great D-line (even without Kearse) and lead the league in sacks. I'm not saying the Eagles D is on par with the Bears or anything, just that they have a lot of talent and should play better as the year goes on.
 
Philly has the most overrated defense in football. 21 ppg, middle-of-the-pack against the run, middle-of-the-pack overall, horrible against the pass.Going by the hype, you'd think they were top-10 across the board.
I don't think there's a ton of hype about Philly's defense. No one is saying they are the Bears or Ravens. They have a decent defense, probably around tenth best in the league.Very good pass rush, decent against the run, and vulnerable to a good passing team at times.I don't recall anyone saying otherwise.
what he said
 
Last year Willford was great with Gerrard. What impact will there be on Willford this time, and in a related matter, is Matt Jones going to play this week or not?

:shrug:

 
Garrard was a very nice option down the stretch last year. That might even be an understatement. From week 12 until week 16 he scored a little over 100 points in a standard scoring league. That kind of production for a full season would have made him the #1 QB last year.

 
Florida Times-Union

Leftwich, Del Rio aren't talking, but all signs point toward backup QB.

By MICHAEL C. WRIGHT, The Times-Union

Backup quarterback David Garrard will start for the Jaguars on Sunday at Philadelphia, replacing injured starter Byron Leftwich, according to a source speaking on the condition of anonymity. Having taken most of the practice repetitions with the first team this week, Garrard said he's "preparing to be the starter," according to his agent, Albert Irby. "I'm just ready to play," Garrard said. "If [coach] Jack [Del Rio] gives me the word, I'll be ready to go."

Apparently the word has been given.

A day after throwing his shoulder pads to the ground during a team stretch, Leftwich, who has an injured left ankle, wasn't anywhere to be found Friday on the Jaguars' practice field. Del Rio declined to comment about the situation and wouldn't confirm if naming the starter would be a game-time decision.

The Jaguars officially listed Leftwich on the injury report as questionable. But generally, when a player - especially a quarterback - misses two practice sessions this close to the end of the week, he isn't likely to play. Leftwich walked through the Jaguars equipment room to a teammate's locker on Friday, but quickly left without speaking to reporters. "If he's not practicing, he's not going to play," the source said.
Jaguars message board
So, It Looks like Del Rio's Losing It

Goes on Sirius radio and says his QB coach blew it by allowing Leftwich to play. Argues with and then benches the franchise quarterback. Benches a leader on defense for giving a pep speech out of turn.
 
Florida Times-Union

Leftwich, Del Rio aren't talking, but all signs point toward backup QB.

By MICHAEL C. WRIGHT, The Times-Union

Backup quarterback David Garrard will start for the Jaguars on Sunday at Philadelphia, replacing injured starter Byron Leftwich, according to a source speaking on the condition of anonymity. Having taken most of the practice repetitions with the first team this week, Garrard said he's "preparing to be the starter," according to his agent, Albert Irby. "I'm just ready to play," Garrard said. "If [coach] Jack [Del Rio] gives me the word, I'll be ready to go."

Apparently the word has been given.

A day after throwing his shoulder pads to the ground during a team stretch, Leftwich, who has an injured left ankle, wasn't anywhere to be found Friday on the Jaguars' practice field. Del Rio declined to comment about the situation and wouldn't confirm if naming the starter would be a game-time decision.

The Jaguars officially listed Leftwich on the injury report as questionable. But generally, when a player - especially a quarterback - misses two practice sessions this close to the end of the week, he isn't likely to play. Leftwich walked through the Jaguars equipment room to a teammate's locker on Friday, but quickly left without speaking to reporters. "If he's not practicing, he's not going to play," the source said.
Jaguars message board
So, It Looks like Del Rio's Losing It

Goes on Sirius radio and says his QB coach blew it by allowing Leftwich to play. Argues with and then benches the franchise quarterback. Benches a leader on defense for giving a pep speech out of turn.
I must have missed this. Who's the leader on defense that got benched?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does the 21 points per game that the "defense" gives up include the two Rhonde Barber interception returns and the DeMarcus Ware fumble return TD? If it does, that stat is horse####.
Everyone's ranking includes that stuff.But take it out. 21 points make the Eagles' average look appreciably better, and when you do it for every other team in the league, the ranking will barely move.
 
Hairy Snowman said:
fruity pebbles said:
Garrard was a very nice option down the stretch last year. That might even be an understatement. From week 12 until week 16 he scored a little over 100 points in a standard scoring league. That kind of production for a full season would have made him the #1 QB last year.
:yes:
Garrard was my pickup of the year last season. I had an above average team last year but rode him to my league title. He was exciting to watch. The guy can run. I picked him up this week as a backup hoping he will remain the starter.
 
Hairy Snowman said:
Mr. Brownstone said:
Hairy Snowman said:
Garrard is a much better passer than Leftowich.

Personally, I think the offense has performed much better overall also when Garrard is under center. There is a reason Leftowich doesn't want to come off the field.

Can anyone say "Wally Pip". :yes:

PS I would say this is bad for the Eagles D
Have you seen these two play for an extended period of time? I'm pretty sure that you haven't.
pre-season was only 8 weeks ago, so yes, I have seen him play recently. :yes: My opinion is he reads the field better than Leftowich. And that is acknowledging Leftowich's improvement in the passing game this year.

We shall see in the end, but I feel Garrard tends to lead his recievers to open areas with a catchable ball, as opposed to Leftowich who tends to drill the ball into the receivers chest with fastballs.

This isn't a slam on Leftowich as much as a backing of Garrard.

IMO you will see the YAC go up for Jacksonville as a team, which is going to improve that offense.

I also expect to see the Jaguar D put on the field more, which could be good or bad for the defense.
sadly, i think 2 points prove all of that wrong.#1. You are pointing to preseason. you aren't allowed to put ":yes:" to points backed up by preseason. Or...are you going back to last year? Which game exactly are you pointing to?

vs. TEN, ARI, CLE, IND, SF, HOU, TEN. Yes. Those were the games he played in last year. Those are just as useless indicators of performance as preseason.

#2. You are saying Garrard is considerably better than Leftwich. He has better reads and he makes better throws. You are saying that they will be a better offense. ......if these were all so true, why has he been backup circa 2003? Do you see these guys more and have better judgment than Coach Del Rio?

hmmm

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jaguars message board

So, It Looks like Del Rio's Losing It Goes on Sirius radio and says his QB coach blew it by allowing Leftwich to play. Argues with and then benches the franchise quarterback. Benches a leader on defense for giving a pep speech out of turn.
I must have missed this Who's the leader on defense that got benched?

Deon Grant came into the locker room during half-time and tried to fire up the team. Unbeknownst to Grant, who came in to the locker room late, Del Rio said he wanted NO speeches and guys to focus on what they should be doing on their own. Grant spoke, Del Rio benched him.

 
David Garrard is for real! I have a hard time with fans only using stat comparisons and popularity to reach judgement. I am sure that alot of fans weren't able to see many of Garrards games last season, or his action in the previous couple years, but he can flat out play! He runs like a power tailback, and has great poise in the passing game which makes him much more than a running QB. Leftwich is the more marketable guy.....and his "name" has carried him through some poor efforts. He does have a stronger arm then Garrard, but Garrard is more mobile and creative on passing downs. You would be wise to get on him now....he will get the Jags back on track, and will remain the starter! :thumbup: :bow: :pickle:

 
The Jacket said:
scratcher said:
Despite their lackluster pass and run D
Interesting concept.Discard the two things a defense does and still make a case for them. :lmao:
:confused: I think my statement made sense... They haven't performed great so far but they have a ton of potential and i expect them to show it in the weeks to come. For the most part, this is the same personnel as the dominant defense of the past.

 
David Garrard is for real! I have a hard time with fans only using stat comparisons and popularity to reach judgement. I am sure that alot of fans weren't able to see many of Garrards games last season, or his action in the previous couple years, but he can flat out play! He runs like a power tailback, and has great poise in the passing game which makes him much more than a running QB. Leftwich is the more marketable guy.....and his "name" has carried him through some poor efforts. He does have a stronger arm then Garrard, but Garrard is more mobile and creative on passing downs. You would be wise to get on him now....he will get the Jags back on track, and will remain the starter! :thumbup: :bow: :pickle:
Yep, I agree. He is an exciting player and one to watch.
 
Hairy Snowman said:
elcohiba said:
Byron Leftwich (out, ankle) and Jaguars head coach Jack Del Rio are currently not on speaking terms.Leftwich was reportedly nowhere to be found at practice Friday. Del Rio isn't speaking to the media either. David Garrard will be Jacksonville's starting quarterback against Philadelphia in Week 8.Source: Florida Times Union/ RotoWorld
Hmm. That sounds like a reaction reserved for more than a week off. How accurate are these guys?
I think Garrard may be the starter for the rest of the year.
 
fatness said:
Florida Times-Union

Leftwich, Del Rio aren't talking, but all signs point toward backup QB.

By MICHAEL C. WRIGHT, The Times-Union

Backup quarterback David Garrard will start for the Jaguars on Sunday at Philadelphia, replacing injured starter Byron Leftwich, according to a source speaking on the condition of anonymity. Having taken most of the practice repetitions with the first team this week, Garrard said he's "preparing to be the starter," according to his agent, Albert Irby. "I'm just ready to play," Garrard said. "If [coach] Jack [Del Rio] gives me the word, I'll be ready to go."

Apparently the word has been given.

A day after throwing his shoulder pads to the ground during a team stretch, Leftwich, who has an injured left ankle, wasn't anywhere to be found Friday on the Jaguars' practice field. Del Rio declined to comment about the situation and wouldn't confirm if naming the starter would be a game-time decision.

The Jaguars officially listed Leftwich on the injury report as questionable. But generally, when a player - especially a quarterback - misses two practice sessions this close to the end of the week, he isn't likely to play. Leftwich walked through the Jaguars equipment room to a teammate's locker on Friday, but quickly left without speaking to reporters. "If he's not practicing, he's not going to play," the source said.
Jaguars message board
So, It Looks like Del Rio's Losing It

Goes on Sirius radio and says his QB coach blew it by allowing Leftwich to play. Argues with and then benches the franchise quarterback. Benches a leader on defense for giving a pep speech out of turn.
A quick word of advice: The Jaguars.com message board is the last place you want to go for rational thought. It is plain awful.
 
Hairy Snowman said:
Mr. Brownstone said:
Hairy Snowman said:
Garrard is a much better passer than Leftowich.

Personally, I think the offense has performed much better overall also when Garrard is under center. There is a reason Leftowich doesn't want to come off the field.

Can anyone say "Wally Pip". :yes:

PS I would say this is bad for the Eagles D
Have you seen these two play for an extended period of time? I'm pretty sure that you haven't.
pre-season was only 8 weeks ago, so yes, I have seen him play recently. :yes: My opinion is he reads the field better than Leftowich. And that is acknowledging Leftowich's improvement in the passing game this year.

We shall see in the end, but I feel Garrard tends to lead his recievers to open areas with a catchable ball, as opposed to Leftowich who tends to drill the ball into the receivers chest with fastballs.

This isn't a slam on Leftowich as much as a backing of Garrard.

IMO you will see the YAC go up for Jacksonville as a team, which is going to improve that offense.

I also expect to see the Jaguar D put on the field more, which could be good or bad for the defense.
sadly, i think 2 points prove all of that wrong.#1. You are pointing to preseason. you aren't allowed to put ":yes:" to points backed up by preseason. Or...are you going back to last year? Which game exactly are you pointing to?

vs. TEN, ARI, CLE, IND, SF, HOU, TEN. Yes. Those were the games he played in last year. Those are just as useless indicators of performance as preseason.

#2. You are saying Garrard is considerably better than Leftwich. He has better reads and he makes better throws. You are saying that they will be a better offense. ......if these were all so true, why has he been backup circa 2003? Do you see these guys more and have better judgment than Coach Del Rio?

hmmm
#1 I have seen every regular season snap Garrard has been involved in and most of the preseason snaps. I am basing my opinion on all of the last few years - he also was pretty good in college.#2 Yes, I am saying he is a better passing QB than Leftowich. Do I have better judgment than Jack Del Rio? :shrug: Maybe in some things. I like to think I have a better eye for offensive talent. :)

Seriously, IMO Leftowich is still holding the ball too long and his long delivery motion continues to allow defenders to anticipate his passes (which IMO is why he tends to drill the receivers with fastballs).

But, as I have said so many times before in these forums, hear me now - believe me later. Garrard will be a more productive passer than Leftowich.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A quick word of advice: The Jaguars.com message board is the last place you want to go for rational thought. It is plain awful.
It pretty much seemed that way to me, yeah. I just thought the bit about what del Rio said on Sirius might be important. If in fact he said it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top