What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

EU warns repeat boosters weaken immune system (1 Viewer)

Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 

 
RavenFan said:
So you think those of us who don't want misinformation disseminated are comparable to the group that killed millions of jews and others and started WW2?

WOW
Click to expand...
You are the one who wants to shut down the first amendment. 

Yea WOW wow

 
RavenFan said:
Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 
Click to expand...
Bloomberg is a horrible site?

 
IvanKaramazov said:
One neurotic poster got bent out of shape over an emoticon and it's DEFCON 1.  But people post obvious lies and nonsense in complete bad faith and we're supposed to be fine with it.  Not my forum, not my call, but this is not how I would do it.
Click to expand...
What was wrong with the Bloomberg link?

 
IvanKaramazov said:
One neurotic poster got bent out of shape over an emoticon and it's DEFCON 1.  But people post obvious lies and nonsense in complete bad faith and we're supposed to be fine with it.  Not my forum, not my call, but this is not how I would do it.
Click to expand...
Why is the Bloomberg article an obvious lie?

 
RavenFan said:
Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 
Click to expand...
Be better when things don’t fit the narrative you want please. 

 
RavenFan said:
Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 
Click to expand...
One of the links is from Bloomberg....No good?  I didn't read it but they are OK aren't they?   You're calling them lies and that's fine, it's your opinion, but I kinda might want to know more.  I haven't received my booster yet.  I got a breakthrough after 2 jabs and I might hold off on the third, fourth, or whatever number we are going to be required to get.  So when you say misinformation, that's just your opinion correct?

 
quick-hands said:
What was wrong with the Bloomberg link?
Click to expand...


Nothing.  It stated that annual boosters timed for the cold season was probably better policy than boosters every 4 months, and that taking too many shots might have negative consequences for the immune system.  Sounds reasonable.  I'd like to see the research regarding the negative consequences, natch. 

The other linked article was more of an issue.  "Scamdemic" in the title?  I guess if you want to find confirmation for your preferred viewpoint on the web, you will find it.  Moving on.

 
Sleestak said:
Nothing.  It stated that annual boosters timed for the cold season was probably better policy than boosters every 4 months, and that taking too many shots might have negative consequences for the immune system.  Sounds reasonable.  I'd like to see the research regarding the negative consequences, natch. 

The other linked article was more of an issue.  "Scamdemic" in the title?  I guess if you want to find confirmation for your preferred viewpoint on the web, you will find it.  Moving on.
Click to expand...
You know, bill laimbeer was a sleestak.

 
This was one of Dr. Malone's claims.  The MRNA delivery system is not designed for endless shots.  It is good for a few and then they started experiencing similar problems.  

MRNA vaccines were signed off on for COVID-19 because the initial plan was only for a couple doses.  

 
RavenFan said:
Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 
Click to expand...


why are you afraid to question ? 

 
RavenFan said:
Astounding what's allowed to be posted here.  Do we really have to go to some of these horrible sites and debunk misinformation and lies continually?  It felt dirty even clicking the link for thuletide.  Heck, they recommend you use a VPN on their site to avoid the global cabal.

Unbelievable. 
Click to expand...


A little over dramatic don`t you think?

Now Bloomberg is unbelievable too?  

 
Summer Wheat said:
A little over dramatic don`t you think?

Now Bloomberg is unbelievable too?  
Click to expand...
Unfortunately,  it was a classic posting mistake. Quit when you made a valid point and don't provide additional info that allows people to cherry pick it so as to avoid the valid point completely.

Some people will pull out a single line of a multi paragraph post to try and invalidate the whole thing.

 
Your post makes it sound like boosters will be the end of our immune systems.

The first article say "too frequent" of boosters may cause problems, and boosters should be spread out.  

We've been doing annual flu shots for I don't even know how long.  Most people's immune systems haven't been "shot" from that.  

And the second link:  LOL.  

 
"While use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy," the European Medicines Agency's Head of Vaccines Strategy, Marco Cavaleri, told a media briefing.

The EMA official raised concerns that a strategy of giving boosters every four months hypothetically poses the risk of overloading people's immune systems and leading to fatigue in the population
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-drug-regulator-says-more-data-needed-impact-omicron-vaccines-2022-01-11/

 
IvanKaramazov said:
One neurotic poster got bent out of shape over an emoticon and it's DEFCON 1.  But people post obvious lies and nonsense in complete bad faith and we're supposed to be fine with it.  Not my forum, not my call, but this is not how I would do it.
Click to expand...
What are the obvious lies?

 
HellToupee said:
"While use of additional boosters can be part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy," the European Medicines Agency's Head of Vaccines Strategy, Marco Cavaleri, told a media briefing.

The EMA official raised concerns that a strategy of giving boosters every four months hypothetically poses the risk of overloading people's immune systems and leading to fatigue in the population
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-drug-regulator-says-more-data-needed-impact-omicron-vaccines-2022-01-11/
Click to expand...
EMA seems all over the place.  Wasn't just last month they were telling people to reduce the length of time between booster doses.  I wonder what changed...

 
Max Power said:
EMA seems all over the place.  Wasn't just last month they were telling people to reduce the length of time between booster doses.  I wonder what changed...
Click to expand...
Vaccine availability? It seems that "public health" officials have let the "health" part of that phrase take a backseat to political concerns throughout the pandemic. Why stop now? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sleestak said:
Nothing.  It stated that annual boosters timed for the cold season was probably better policy than boosters every 4 months, and that taking too many shots might have negative consequences for the immune system.  Sounds reasonable.  I'd like to see the research regarding the negative consequences, natch. 

The other linked article was more of an issue.  "Scamdemic" in the title?  I guess if you want to find confirmation for your preferred viewpoint on the web, you will find it.  Moving on.
Click to expand...


Exactly. From the first article:

European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.  

Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune response and tire out people, according to the European Medicines Agency. Instead, countries should leave more time between booster programs and tie them to the onset of the cold season in each hemisphere, following the blueprint set out by influenza vaccination strategies, the agency said. 
Click to expand...


Yeah, well, I agree that this could weaken the immune response. Lot of things could happen in this world, but nothing to get excited about at this point that I can see.

The second article however got into tin foil hat territory, talking about United Nations’ Agenda 21 Plan, and ranting about the Rockefellers, at which point I stopped reading. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HellToupee said:
What are the obvious lies?
Click to expand...


The problem as I see it is the idea of "repeat" versus excessive or too frequent.  I don't think anybody is arguing that getting vaccines every day/week/month is a good idea but as jm points out, we get yearly flu shots.  We need better definitions on what they mean by excessive.

 
Where is the science that states that vaccines will weaken the immune system if taken to frequently?

Are they just guessing or has similar testing been done with other vaccines?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uwe Blab said:
“How dare you claim my link is conspiracy theory garbage. I’ll show you “

:posts another conspiracy garbage site:   :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Go back to the Rachael Maddox show. You don’t even have to read it. All links have factual data backing up the posts. Nothing from the Steele dossier was used.

 
pinkham13 said:
Go back to the Rachael Maddox show. You don’t even have to read it. All links have factual data backing up the posts. Nothing from the Steele dossier was used.
Click to expand...
Who is Rachael Maddox?

“All links have fACTuaL dAtA”

ha ha ha ha ha…..no

 
pinkham13 said:
You didn’t read anything. That’s obvious. Go troll elsewhere with your zero thought rebuttals.
Click to expand...
As soon as I saw it was from a conspiracy site it’s a complete waste of time. About as useful as reading the guy on the street corner’s homemade pamphlet he hands you. You are that guy on the street corner right now. 🤷🏻I’ll just nod my head at you….and not make eye  contact.

 
Uwe Blab said:
As soon as I saw it was from a conspiracy site it’s a complete waste of time. About as useful as reading the guy on the street corner’s homemade pamphlet he hands you. You are that guy on the street corner right now. 🤷🏻I’ll just nod my head at you….and not make eye  contact.
Click to expand...
That’s how you go through life ignoring the top scientist in Israel because it wasn’t on my Facebook approved list?

https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/

 
General Malaise said:
You really seem angry.  
Click to expand...
You seem to be able to deny reality daily. If Gates or Zuckerberg didn’t pay for the propaganda you won’t read it. You might be angry too if your friends in the hospital agree with Joe Rogan and Dr Malone. I have had several losses due to this agenda. We all have.

 
pinkham13 said:
You seem to be able to deny reality daily. If Gates or Zuckerberg didn’t pay for the propaganda you won’t read it. You might be angry too if your friends in the hospital agree with Joe Rogan and Dr Malone. I have had several losses due to this agenda. We all have.
Click to expand...


Maybe we could schedule a phone call to talk in person?  I really want to hear more of your thoughts.  They seem so coherent.

 
A "top scientist".   Do we have ratings for these things?   What if 99% of other top scientists think this one is incorrect? 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LawFitz
COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?
5 6 7
Replies
305
Views
18K
LawFitz
LawFitz

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top