ignatiusjreilly
Footballguy
You guys crack me up: "I don't know what everyone is complaining about. Only one of the links in his original post was from a bat#### crazy conspiracy site."

That's my feeling, too. If I were a moderator, I wouldn't want people using my forums to spread misinformation. But I'm also sympathetic to Joe not wanting to spend all of his time policing this stuff and deciding what's OK and what's over the line. And in the grand scheme of things, people posting this stuff on a magic football forum where most of the posters lean left probably isn't having all that big of an impact, especially compared to the same misinfo getting algorithmically amplified on Facebook, or in private WhatsApp chats, or on Fox News. Hopefully the more time they spend posting here to people who just roll their eyes and ignore them means less time influencing people whose health might actually be impacted.Not my forum, not my call, but this is not how I would do it.
Well, he mat not be THE top scientist, but he's probably A top scientist. First round talent? Not sure.KarmaPolice said:A "top scientist". Do we have ratings for these things? What if 99% of other top scientists think this one is incorrect?
I didn't check this guy out, but it always cracks me up when the "top scientist" they found for the article isn't even in that specialty field. Hey we found a top scientist (he teaches physics) who thinks x, y, and z about covid!!Well, he mat not be THE top scientist, but he's probably A top scientist. First round talent? Not sure.
Set us up the scientist draftWell, he mat not be THE top scientist, but he's probably A top scientist. First round talent? Not sure.
pinkham13 said:You seem to be able to deny reality daily. If Gates or Zuckerberg didn’t pay for the propaganda you won’t read it. You might be angry too if your friends in the hospital agree with Joe Rogan and Dr Malone. I have had several losses due to this agenda. We all have.
He has top men working on it. Top men.Well, he mat not be THE top scientist, but he's probably A top scientist. First round talent? Not sure.
You want the OG booster or the 1.1 booster?So is the idea of waiting on the booster a few months to have it peak ready for next variant without merit?
Asking for a friend.
It's the entertainment factor. It's funny. Even though it's not intentional.Hopefully the more time they spend posting here to people who just roll their eyes and ignore them means less time influencing people whose health might actually be impacted.
I’m lost, I got both Pfizer doses first half of last year.You want the OG booster or the 1.1 booster?
You should probably wait for 1.2, but that wont be ready for 3 months after we identify the next dominant strain.
All the boosters people are taking now were designed for the original strain.I’m lost, I got both Pfizer doses first half of last year.
It’s theoretical at this point. There are a few vaccines for which repeated short-term exposure increased the risk of infection, and unsubstantiated concerns about ADE.Where is the science that states that vaccines will weaken the immune system if taken to frequently?
Are they just guessing or has similar testing been done with other vaccines?