Mile High
Footballguy
"Don't worry guys, this slope isn't slippery at all..."Some of the US Senators are calling for it...He is not being treated as an enemy combatant.
"Don't worry guys, this slope isn't slippery at all..."Some of the US Senators are calling for it...He is not being treated as an enemy combatant.
I keep seeing people troll this crappy poster. What is the deal here? Who did he take money from?Mr. Cross said:You care that innocent people had money taken from them? I guess people can change.CurlyNight said:This is true but now they are deciding if shutting down the whole city for the day for one dude was the best way to handle this. Seems Boston is out 300 mil for yesterday's shutdown. :dunno:Leeroy Jenkins said:Boston police handled this so much better than the lapd's fiasco. No random people got shot up or anything.
BingoI think CurlyNight is a she who has some history from FFToday.
### #### it.Good thing nobody here would be that foolish.Czechs: we're not Chechens
PRAGUE (AP) A number of comments by Americans on social media mistaking the Czech Republic for the country of origin of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects ethnic Chechen brothers prompted the Czech ambassador to the United States to act.
In a statement posted on the embassy Web site, Petr Gandalovic said "the Czech Republic and Chechnya are two very different entities the Czech Republic is a Central European country; Chechnya is a part of the Russian Federation."
Gandalovic calls it "a most unfortunate misunderstanding," but some responses on Twitter are less diplomatic.
Mirca Sekerova recommends Americans "open a geography book once in a while...stop blaming our country for this."
And Petr Manda commented: "Well done, U.S. education system."
You don't think declaring this guy an enemy combatant is a slippery slope? Please explain.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
England has had the Official Secrets Act and has been doing this stuff for decades. But it is still a free country.You don't think declaring this guy an enemy combatant is a slippery slope? Please explain.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
He's both?So the brother who is still alive and not dead,
I am somewhat interested.:Snoggerhipple:timschochet said:You know what? I've tried to be nice, but I'm tired of putting up with your ####. I didn't write anything that would warrant a response like that. Earlier I asked, because I was curious, whether he would be tried by the state, or federally, or named a combatant. I thought it was an interesting question, and I was hoping that some people around here more familiar with the legal system than I am could provide some insight. They did. But you've engaged in attacking me ever since. I don't even know you. I don't think people reading this thread are interested in you attacking me. If you have nothing of substance to offer, then get the #### out of here.Tony Jabroni said:Ask Tim.Premier said:When do they begin the waterboarding? Now?
Neil Diamond on hand to sing Sweet Caroline at the Sawx Game. Seems like he might be drunk, and odd performance.
Neil: Ah, ha ha ha ha! This first song.. [ Kenny the Keyboard Player intros "Sweet Caroline", crowd applauds ] Thank you. That, of course, "Sweet Caroline". I wrote that song after a big show at the Forum. Gary and I had been drinking pretty heavily, and we were driving..
Gary: [ worried ] Oh, I can't believe you're gonna tell this story..
Neil: Ha ha ha ha ha! Yeah, well, we were driving down this dark road, and I hit a kid. [ the crowd is stunned ] So, we got out, and sure enough he was dead. So, we just took off. Pretty fast. And, two hours later, I wrote "Sweet Caroline". Sweet Caroline. Good times never seemed so good. Thank you.
He's a jackass.http://www.buzzfeed.com/ktlincoln/red-sox-player-david-ortiz-declares-during-pregame-tribute-tany video yet?That sox pregame ceremony was the best I've ever seen in any sport. Capped off perfectly by David Ortiz "This is our fuching city" (no H). Crowd went nuts. Wow.
He's both?So the brother who is still alive and not dead,
Telling the truth is usually good for your pr.Ilov80s said:It was an incredible interview. Somehow, this middle aged immigrant is a master of spin. He took what should have been a really nasty PR situation and came out of it with a reallity positive image.Raider Nation said:Gotta love the uncle. Reporter: "What do you think provoked this?" Uncle: "Being losers!"
He still got laid right after.Neil Diamond on hand to sing Sweet Caroline at the Sawx Game. Seems like he might be drunk, an odd performance.
Well, that's weird.More info from the police chief on what went down with Black Hat. He was tackled and being handcuffed when White Hat ran him over.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-details/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
ETA: this was reported by CNN. Don't blame me if it was all wrong.
Wait! This next song I wrote after I killed a drifter to get an erection.
Not only police scanners got the suspect's name wrong. Foxnews did too. Oof.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/04/20/article-2312183-196752E2000005DC-230_634x425.jpg
I was interested in this part because of comments about which of the brothers was the leader or the follower.Well, that's weird.More info from the police chief on what went down with Black Hat. He was tackled and being handcuffed when White Hat ran him over.http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-details/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
ETA: this was reported by CNN. Don't blame me if it was all wrong.
I agree. I mean, hopefully a boat company does the right thing here but I'd rather donate to these poor people who had their ####### legs blown off them.Donations for his boat? The FBI and PD shot it up cornering the most wanted suspect at the time. I think insurance and the town can cover this one?Not covering it would be a bigger PR disaster.
When he was taken into custody from the bottom of a boat in the backyard of a Watertown home Friday night, the suspect was bleeding badly and too weak to resist any longer, officials said.
Yes, the victims need help with their huge medical bills. Please donate.http://onefundboston.org/I agree. I mean, hopefully a boat company does the right thing here but I'd rather donate to these poor people who had their ####### legs blown off them.Donations for his boat?
The FBI and PD shot it up cornering the most wanted suspect at the time.
I think insurance and the town can cover this one?
Not covering it would be a bigger PR disaster.
I am big time in favor of whatever tools we have at our disposal that allows us to question this guy without the benefit of an attorney. No doubt.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
David Henneberry's boat is a 22-foot Seahawk cruiser with a fiberglass hull, which retails for around $50,000.I am pretty sure the boat is covered under the act of Allah clause.
This is a patently ridiculous statement, unless you qualify it by saying "liberty being totally lost incrementally.... Liberty is continually being lost as more and more laws are passed. People are not free to drive drunk on the highways, although there was a time when they were; people are not free to drive at whatever speed they choose, although there was a time they were; people are not free to spank their children in public, although there was a time they were; people are not free to drive without car insurance, although there was a time when they were...All these laws have been passed for what we believe are good and cogent reasons, but to say they do not circumscribe liberty is fatuous.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
Tax Code down?????I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
Not sure he had a very effective vest on. His morgue pic showed his face and neck were the only thing visiblt burnt.How did black hats suicide vest not hurt anyone tackling him? I'm not sure I understand how that works.
So we should throw out Miranda rights, rights to an attorney, and the Constitution for all accused US citizens?I am big time in favor of whatever tools we have at our disposal that allows us to question this guy without the benefit of an attorney. No doubt.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
Quite the leap and not worthy of a response.So we should throw out Miranda rights, rights to an attorney, and the Constitution for all accused US citizens?I am big time in favor of whatever tools we have at our disposal that allows us to question this guy without the benefit of an attorney. No doubt.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
Wouldn't he get "credit" for that? Killing an enemy combatant of the US.Waiting to see if he will be charged for running over his own brother.
Seems vindictive. I think they wouldn't want to do anything to push him away from opening up to the interrogator(s).Waiting to see if he will be charged for running over his own brother.
Classic!! The easy way of saying "You are correct, but no way will I admit it"Quite the leap and not worthy of a response.So we should throw out Miranda rights, rights to an attorney, and the Constitution for all accused US citizens?I am big time in favor of whatever tools we have at our disposal that allows us to question this guy without the benefit of an attorney. No doubt.I am not in favor of making this guy an enemy combatant, but this slippery slope stuff is as nonsensical here as it is in the gun control debate. This is NO historical example of liberty being lost incrementally, over time, through well meaning action or laws. It doesn't work that way, ever.
1) because they wanted him dead or trigger happy or nervous or all three.2) they thought they could catch them without the help of the public. Which if they had the info on #1 why didn't they just stake out his home and his brothers home since they weren't hiding or on the run? HmmmmmTwo questions in the aftermath: 1) Why did they start firing on #2 in the boat when they first encountered him? From what I understand he didn't fire any shots at them, but just peeked out. Seems like they would want him alive.2) So, the FBI did some checking on #1 (older brother), and even interviewed him a few years ago. How did they not identify him when they had pictures the next day. Why did they have to go to the public to identify him? Seems like they should have ID'd him and apprehended him instead of this manhunt that had 1 officer killed and one injured. From everything I read, these 2 suspects weren't in hiding/on the run, until their photos were released.
White Hat did fire shots from the boat, according to the Watertown Police chief.Two questions in the aftermath: 1) Why did they start firing on #2 in the boat when they first encountered him? From what I understand he didn't fire any shots at them, but just peeked out. Seems like they would want him alive.2) So, the FBI did some checking on #1 (older brother), and even interviewed him a few years ago. How did they not identify him when they had pictures the next day. Why did they have to go to the public to identify him? Seems like they should have ID'd him and apprehended him instead of this manhunt that had 1 officer killed and one injured. From everything I read, these 2 suspects weren't in hiding/on the run, until their photos were released.
Re 2 - we don't know that they didn't know his identity. We don't know that they didn't release the pictures to try and lure them out in to doing something stupid (worked) or to lure out associates (not yet). The briefings included what the FBI wanted the public to know as a tool of furthering the investigation, not as a tool to quench the public thirst to know what was going on.Two questions in the aftermath: 1) Why did they start firing on #2 in the boat when they first encountered him? From what I understand he didn't fire any shots at them, but just peeked out. Seems like they would want him alive.2) So, the FBI did some checking on #1 (older brother), and even interviewed him a few years ago. How did they not identify him when they had pictures the next day. Why did they have to go to the public to identify him? Seems like they should have ID'd him and apprehended him instead of this manhunt that had 1 officer killed and one injured. From everything I read, these 2 suspects weren't in hiding/on the run, until their photos were released.