SacramentoBob
Footballguy
It shouldn't at all.Which shouldn't play into the voting at all really.......
It shouldn't at all.Which shouldn't play into the voting at all really.......
For the reasons provided by Myers in the article/interview , touched on by Dungy in that article and by Peter King in previous articles I feel it absolutely should matter.Obviously that viewpoint is not shared by everyone, which is why they said they had such a long debate. So I respect the opinion of all of you who don't think it should matter and you had HOF voters who shared your viewpoint. Neither of us are crazy. I'm just glad the majority thought it should matter in his case.It shouldn't at all.Which shouldn't play into the voting at all really.......
Of course it should. It's absurd to think that a part of a player's playing career shouldn't be part of the discussion of a player's playing career.Which shouldn't play into the voting at all really.......
Why not? What is a HoF player? One of the all time greats... one who had that much of a positive influence on the field.It shouldn't at all.
There are people who are alive that wishes they had the fake hair on Kevin Greene's HOF bust. I mean they nailed that one. Great speech as wellEncyclopedia Brown said:Kevin Greene rocking the Paulie Walnuts wingtips.
TO should have been a first ballot HOFer.Why not? What is a HoF player? One of the all time greats... one who had that much of a positive influence on the field.
If a QB throws 400 career TDs, but somehow has 300 INTs, don't we count the latter to address how positive they were all around? Didn't TO's antics - off the field sometimes, but often in practice, doing harm and even doing harm by his in game antics - didn't they contribute negatively to his team?
The fact is, I bet many teams, even at TO's physical best, would NOT want him on their team. Why? Because his bad could OUTWEIGH his good (and his good being supreme talent and production when into the game). If the bad outweighs the good, or at BEST does great harm to it, how can you ignore that?
It's one thing if TOs off the field issues were non-football related. Drugs, violence, things that, honestly, are "worse" morally than what he did. But TO HURT his team football wise by his antics... personally, I think there are many more HoF worthy than TO, because of the destructive, negative influence he was on certain teams.
TO should have been a first ballot HOFer.
He's awesome, I remember that game like it was yesterday. Wing night at the bar, not expecting much out of him and then he goes off. Also having lost a father too soon man the faucets were on haha. Lucky to have gotten to watch the guy, heck of a player.
Plus he gave you probably the most enjoyable year in recent memory for your own team, as well. That's gotta add to your respect for him.Life long Vikings fan here, but I would like to take this opportunity to say, with the exception of 2 sometimes 3 games a year, I always enjoyed watching Brett play ball.
I don't think any QB had more fun playing this game than Favre did.
Got news for ya, there isn't a team in football that wouldn't gladly take Owens at his physical best. Don't be naive.Why not? What is a HoF player? One of the all time greats... one who had that much of a positive influence on the field.
If a QB throws 400 career TDs, but somehow has 300 INTs, don't we count the latter to address how positive they were all around? Didn't TO's antics - off the field sometimes, but often in practice, doing harm and even doing harm by his in game antics - didn't they contribute negatively to his team?
The fact is, I bet many teams, even at TO's physical best, would NOT want him on their team. Why? Because his bad could OUTWEIGH his good (and his good being supreme talent and production when into the game). If the bad outweighs the good, or at BEST does great harm to it, how can you ignore that?
It's one thing if TOs off the field issues were non-football related. Drugs, violence, things that, honestly, are "worse" morally than what he did. But TO HURT his team football wise by his antics... personally, I think there are many more HoF worthy than TO, because of the destructive, negative influence he was on certain teams.
Nowadays, he'd get a 15-yard penalty for removing his helmet during a celebration.I was 14 years old when Brett Favre took over. I was a huge Majik fan. I remember being really sad that Majik got hurt. I became an instant Favre fan though. The guy simply was the greatest we had ever seen.
But just last night I went back and watched the drive that Favre put on vs Cincy in his debut. 92 yards, 1:07 on the clock, no timeouts, Sterling Sharpe was hurt. Seriously, watch this. Rookie QBs just don't do this. The guy was slinging frozen ropes
Brett Favre is why I watch footbal today.