FBG! Top 250 Issue? TE values off? (1 Viewer)

[Short Corner]

I had QB1 slotted at 1.04-1.05 and TE1 slotted at 1.12-2.01 this year. TE1 was valued around RB8 and QB1 was above RB4.

I think that was a pretty standard ranking for the top TE/QB this year. It doesn't seem to match up with your baseline though. But, without seeing your projections, I can's say that for sure.

You're right, I'm lying.

My apologies if that is how my statement came off - I didn't intend to question your honestly.I am simply pointing out that your baseline is more RB heavy, TE light, than most - yet your rankings, at least at the top, seem to be pretty standard.Again, my apologies. I enjoyed looking at your baselines - gave me something to ponder, which is always a good thing.

No worries. I get a little salty staying up late to watch Giants-Niners. FWIW, FBG uses the top 100 players (or around there) as their baseline, how that goes across positions I haven't a clue. I use 108 players (first half of our draft) and use the prior 3 year average from our leagueas to how divvy it up position wise.

 

[BroadwayG]

Pierre even further out in front now.

 

[glock]

BumpskiSomeone care to offer their take on this??

When do these players have bye weeks? You may want to look at more than just 1 column in that tool.

Did that. Brady and Vick are still way to close ROS IMHO. Just few points separate them after this week.

I think you're missing something very important here.

I usually have a pretty decent grasp of the obvious, but I'm shuked here. Throw me a line. Or a PM.

 

[glock]

BTW- the Brady-Vick example I cited above has morphed into something that makes much more sense.

That is all.

 

[glock]

BTW- the Brady-Vick example I cited above has morphed into something that makes much more sense. That is all.

Not so fast. All forked up again.