timschochet
Footballguy
Finally have a minute to look at this.Wilk said:Maybe kc7
Rb5...be7
Ra5...rxb4
Ra4...rb3
Ra7+...kd6
Ra6+...ke5
He has to play ba7 or move his rook, and rb6 or ra8 are answered with rxd5.
After Ra5, you mean Bxb4?
Finally have a minute to look at this.Wilk said:Maybe kc7
Rb5...be7
Ra5...rxb4
Ra4...rb3
Ra7+...kd6
Ra6+...ke5
He has to play ba7 or move his rook, and rb6 or ra8 are answered with rxd5.
I'm trying to see what you meant here. I think you meant:Wilk said:Maybe kc7
Rb5...be7
Ra5...rxb4
Ra4...rb3
Ra7+...kd6
Ra6+...ke5
He has to play ba7 or move his rook, and rb6 or ra8 are answered with rxd5.
Yes. Sorry.Finally have a minute to look at this.
After Ra5, you mean Bxb4?
You're right. f5 doesn't work because Bg1 Rh3 Bc5+ Kd7 d6Yes. Sorry.
If bc7, what do we do after he plays rb7? Nothing looks good to me.
Yeah. Or maybe bd6. Either way, at worst we draw. Regardless, i think kc7 is our play here.Kc7 Rb5 Be7 Ba7 Rb3?
f5 Rf3 Rd5 f4 Re5Kd7 Bc5 Bxc5 Rxc5
this may be what he's playing for.
This is good for us, no? We get his d pawn back eventually.Kd7 Bc5 Bxc5 Rxc5
this may be what he's playing for.
You lost me heref5 Rf3 Rd5 f4 Re5
This doesn't work
I lost me too. Anyhow we're not there yet. Can you think of any alternative to Kd7?This is good for us, no? We get his d pawn back eventually.
You lost me here
If he's going to play Bc5 our king needs to be closer. I think Kd7.Kd7 or kc8 look ok to me.
I think i might slightly prefer kc8 even though it pulls our king away from the center. What is his next likely move should we play kc8?
...kc8If he's going to play Bc5 our king needs to be closer. I think Kd7.
You're right. I missed that. So Kc8 prevents Bc5. But what if he just moves the bishop again? Back to f2 or g1 or a7? Aren't we worse off with our king on c8?...kc8
Bc5...rxd5
All good, right?
Kd7 looks ok to me too. Either kc8 or kd7 followed by bc5 and a bishop swap wins us back a pawn as best i can tell.If he's going to play Bc5 our king needs to be closer. I think Kd7.
Yeah. Maybe so. If he wants bc5, why not just play it now if for no reason than to drive back our king? I assume he doesn't play bc5 next if we play kd7, and probably not even if we play kc8. As best I can tell, he cant hold both white pawns after bc5. (I dont think he can hold them both anyway, but i cant figure out how to actually win).OK I still prefer Kd7, but let's wait until morning.
I like the point about Rb7. So I agree with Kc8. Let's do it.Nice job the last few moves, just really nice.
After a few minutes of study (perhaps not enough), I can't see too much of a difference between Kd7 and Kc8 except that Kc8 does prevent Bc5 as wilk noted (because of Rxd5) *and* it prevents his rook from moving to b7 (after he clears the bishop to another square), which would be undesirable (particularly if our king and bishop are parked on the seventh rank as well).
So I would favor Kc8 despite moving our king farther from the center, and see what happens.
Current board I believe.We have a lot of choices here:
Bxb4 obviously
but I like Bd6. I don't really care about the b pawn. If we're going to win we need to find a way to get our passed pawns rolling. Bd6 starts that because it allows us to play f4.
We can't allow him to take the e pawn or the f pawn and have any chance to win the game, at least not while he retains his bishop. Pretty much the only way we win is by keeping both of our pawns. That's the problem with your plan.Current board I believe.
Bd6, then play f4. Through two moves, f5 and then f4? I guess, but I don't think he's going to sit idle while we do that, so I don't know.
Without too much analysis I like liquidating the b-pawn. We threaten the rook. He can respond with Ra8+ but I see Kb7 in response and his pieces can't protect themselves. I think he would answer with Ra4 and then we can clear the bishop, he gets our e-pawn and we (finally) get the d-pawn, his last. That would set up a fascinating endgame as we battle to protect the f-pawn. I'm sure there's some flaw in there.
Lurker on this thread not anywhere as skilled as you gentlemen but thoroughly enjoying this match. As others have said regardless of the outcome you have all done an admirable job so far vs Kaspy. If there were no flaws with the above suggestion (Bxb4 Ra4 and then each clears a pawn) it would indeed make for a great endgame.Current board I believe.
Bd6, then play f4. Through two moves, f5 and then f4? I guess, but I don't think he's going to sit idle while we do that, so I don't know.
Without too much analysis I like liquidating the b-pawn. We threaten the rook. He can respond with Ra8+ but I see Kb7 in response and his pieces can't protect themselves. I think he would answer with Ra4 and then we can clear the bishop, he gets our e-pawn and we (finally) get the d-pawn, his last. That would set up a fascinating endgame as we battle to protect the f-pawn. I'm sure there's some flaw in there.
I don't agree that we can't win unless we retain both pawns. In any case, Bxb5 Ra4 Rb3 is not a bad sequence.We can't allow him to take the e pawn or the f pawn and have any chance to win the game, at least not while he retains his bishop. Pretty much the only way we win is by keeping both of our pawns. That's the problem with your plan.
If Bxb5 Ra4 Rb3 is forced. That might not be so bad but that's what we have to play. We can't give lip the e pawn.
tim and wilk have indeed certainly authored a nice position.Lurker on this thread not anywhere as skilled as you gentlemen but thoroughly enjoying this match. As others have said regardless of the outcome you have all done an admirable job so far vs Kaspy. If there were no flaws with the above suggestion (Bxb4 Ra4 and then each clears a pawn) it would indeed make for a great endgame.