What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFPC dynasty and redraft leagues thread (4 Viewers)

menobrown said:
barackdhouse said:
As for the question of only going 2 QB in a SuperFlex format... I think the idea is that you fire several different shots at a tourney like this. Bullets as we say. Similar to poker tourneys with re-buys. And you draft to a scenario. You commit to that scenario when you draft. If Fields loses his job or if either QB gets hurt, that doesn't sink my team, per se, though it certainly moves in that direction. The studs at other positions, and the boom weeks of the bench guys, can offset and do more than compete in that actual SF spot. Watch you don't take a 0 when one is benched/hurt and the other is on bye.

But the main thing that outweighs all the rest of that is that you are using a strategy where you understand some bullets will miss. But you committed to that scenario. Most of these Jets stacks that I've been doing crucially include Wilson, but if you're going to draft Fields in the 2nd round of a SF, then you are making the bet and assumption that he keeps the job and helps you win the thing. So there isn't necessarily as much of an incentive to hedge with a 3rd QB as may appear.

In a previous one above I had stacked Geno with Bowers/Bech/Thornton and so yeah would have loved to grab Jakobi but after taking Bowers in the 1st round I basically committed to taking Geno because the scenario I'm assuming it comes to pass that Bowers smashes. And in the scenario where the Raiders smash then I've got a big big piece of it.

Stacking scenarios.
Click to expand...
Appreciate sharing the thought process but since I'm new to SF I was not sure how to build my roster before I drafted I studied the top 10 overall finishes from the previous two seasons and seems like going with 2 Qb's is a difficult path to take.

Zero teams who finished in the top 10 the last two years drafted less then 3 QB's.

Last year every team in the top 10 drafted exactly 3 QB's. The previous year 7 teams in the top 10 took 3 QB's, 3 teams took 4 QBs'.

I know the goal is to win the whole thing of course but you got to survive to advance and I also had noticed that between drafting 2-8 QB's that the lowest advancement rate was surprisingly going with just 2 QB's. (better then the 3 total teams that chose 1 and 9 though)

The one caveat to that is that in a few cases those third(and 4th QB's )were relatively worthless due to injury or not having the starting job. So I do think it's possibe to buck those odds if your two stay healthy all year.
Click to expand...
Yeah my preference is pretty much always to have a 3rd QB but it needs to be one that is starting and not just some late dart. I do think a 2QB build can win as per my argument, but I'm not going to say that I like it. The position drops off a cliff this year and I think any format is a challenge this season in terms of either waiting on QB or grabbing one for depth. It's a particular hard landscape to read this year. Not sure that was quite as true these past few years. I don't think waiting on QB is quite the same game this year. Or as we turn the page into July anyway.

I also wonder how many entries actually went with just 2 QBs. How big of a sample is that compared to the 3, 4 and 5 QB builds? I know I can look it up too and I know it's a significant number but I would be willing to bet that out of those 2QB builds I could find some flaws that aren't related to the QBs and that we'd be left with a fairly small sample of teams "giving it a solid shot". I'm trying to avoid those 2QB builds but to be honest thru 5 completed SF BB Tourney drafts on FFPC, I have 2,2,2,3, and 4 QBs on each. But even on the two squads with 3 and 4, I've waited.

I *do* like the three teams I built that way but now I must try going QB heavy in terms of drafting three early, like in the first 4 rounds, to see what the rest of my team looks like when I do that. That is a route I haven't gone yet. I'm not a big fan of how I suspect those builds will come out. In addition to not liking QB depth this year, I also don't like the WR and RB depth this year, though I sort of love TE actually. And so trying to build a roster of stud WRs and RBs (if I go heavy early QB I'm *probably* waiting on TE) after starting so heavy at QB is really tough to do if those positions also fall off a cliff. Most seasons I have quite a few sleepers or undervalued players I like a lot in later rounds. I have many this year as well but not really very optimistic about them. So I don't wanna go into those late rounds feeling like I'm weak at RB and WR. The advantage (or perceived advantage) in the SuperFlex starting spot that a team that went QB heavy early, is going to have over say one of my 2QB builds... is not necessarily the slam dunk folks think it is. My 3rd highest scoring WR or 2nd highest TE or 3rd RB can *easily* hold a bigger advantage in the SF spot than their "elite" 2nd QB.

But I need to start shooting some "early heavy QB" bullets
 
menobrown said:
barackdhouse said:
d if going stack heavy is as critical in this format? I think you need at least one, just not sure how heavy it needs to be. Just a thought because if we assume most weeks a QB will occupy the flex spot it's not opening up as many starting lineup options. If that makes any sense?
Click to expand...

I did not study this vs the non-SF $125 BB but as near as I could tell the winning team in the SF tourney last year had one stack. Hurts and Devonta. I checked only the teams who finished in the top 5 and they all had one stack but a lot of them were QB/RB and all in all not really heavy. 3 teams had 3 player stacks on the same teams with one team(that finished third) having two 3 player stacks. A Goff/Jameson/Monty , Goff/Jameons/Gibbs, Baker/Godwin/Bucky and a Burrow/Higgins/Mike G.

Again I'm new to SF so just studying past trends but I came to conclusion you needed at least one stack but don't need to be to heavy on any team and at the risk of sounding stupid the biggest key is just drafting good players with your later picks. Tons of Bucky, Brian Thomas, Goff and Baker teams.
Click to expand...
Yeah I mean different schools of thought on stacking. IDK. I think it's fun and there are definitely arguments for it.

Most BB junkies will tell you to take the better player rather than reaching to fill a stack. And I agree. But, there is reaching and then there is reaching. I don't mind reaching across a tier break to make it happen. Depends on all kinds of things of course.

But, fundamentally when you drafted your starting QB X and your second QB Y, you committed to the notion that in week 17 these are the guys that are going to win it for you. (Or the top guy if it wasn't SuperFlex). So how many other finalists are you matched up against in that round? 100? 300? 50? How many of them have the same QB X and/or Y? And what if their main #1 target goes off? Well you need to be able to at least match that (most likely). What if the 3rd bench guy that has a blow up game every once in a while blows up? Well you need to be able to at least match that (most likely). And so of course if you have someone unique from that stack that other don't... I know you know this drill but stacking is at least as much about matching chalk as it is about finding something unique that gives you leverage.

But, counterpoint - same situation, QB X and his main target go off, and most opponents who have QB X also have his main target, so chalk is matched up here. But what if the 3rd option didn't blow up that week and your opponent(s) are the ones that reached for that guy in the draft but you said no no there is another much better player here from some other team... who goes off in week 17 and gives you the ship. Or simply gets more points marginally and it ends up mattering.

So, I mean, you tell me what the secret sauce is? Do you have to stack? No, I really don't think you do. I have a lot of fun with it though and I have a hard time arguing against it other than the obvious that has been stated - don't give up too much value to reach for a stack piece. (But critically it is the later round guys that might make the difference)
 
Last edited:
@menobrown for example what if player X that goes in the first round (let's say non-QB) ends up getting injured for the season but you built a stack with their backup that assumes the role. And was going in like the 17th round? I don't wanna name names because **** injuries but building a lineup that assumes an extreme scenario... is a whole other type of bullet to fire. And likely to hold intense leverage if the scenario is realized. And those extreme scenarios are not necessarily that extreme, they're just super random and you have to be willing to use your wallet as a tool by throwing darts at those scenarios. That's why lots of BB drafters like to max out on entries. I can never do that even if I do have the money because the time commitment is too much.

But what if you built a SF lineup with Penix in the 6th, Wilson in the 14th and Milroe in the 19th and Darnold gets hurt week 3 or something. **** sorry I said a name. Sigh. You grab Nabers (or Bijan) early you grab JSN, you grab London, that's 1-2-3 then Walker, Charb, Skattebo, Tracy, all decent values at their ADP. Again, drafting to a scenario, but Pitts is dirt cheap, the rookie Arroyo can possibly flip leagues if I'm right about him and you can get him around 18th. Theo Johnson might be a decent sleeper too.

Then pick your poison between guys like Slayton, Wan'dale, Seahawks #2 or #3, Mooney who is also probably a good value. I guess that's a lot to type just to say if you hit on a late rando like Milroe then there aren't going to be too many opponents with that lineup.
 
Ramblin Wreck said:
Any of you do FFPC redraft managed leagues? How is the competition in those?
Click to expand...
The Big Gorilla and Main Event are both redraft managed leagues. Competition is a mixed bag IMHO, not unlike most platforms or stakes levels.

The rules make it more competitive than typical leagues. Only the top 4 teams make the league playoffs and only the top 2 make the big dance.
 
I gotta say that I am LOVING what I hope is a new tradition for the SharkPool with these cheap best ball leagues for some comaraderie, competition and spring/summer boredom relief. It’s all brand new for me but it will definitely be an annual thing for me at least.
 
Just watched a video where it had 2 guys top 40 rookie rankings with IDP and 1 guy had Jeanty at 3 and Hampton at 12. I turned it off after that and left a comment that said "ABSURD"
 
Just got an interesting offer:

Give Kaleb Johnson
Get Xavier Worthy

I won this league in 2024 and my roster is loaded at RB and WR. But that is a good deal...... right?!
 
Born to Run said:
Just got an interesting offer:

Give Kaleb Johnson
Get Xavier Worthy

I won this league in 2024 and my roster is loaded at RB and WR. But that is a good deal...... right?!
Click to expand...
Maybe this is my old school RB hoarding addiction shining though, but I’d take the potential of Kaleb over the what-ifs-with-Rice-back of Worthy.
 
Last edited:
Fired two more $35 SF BB Tourney bullets, both 2QB builds again though I do have two slow drafts currently going with 3 QBs each.

These were live drafts. From the 7:

Mahomes, K Murray
Harvey, K Johnson, ETN (Jax), Benson, B Smith, Brooks
Rice, Worthy, Harrison, Flowers, Odunze, Burden, K Coleman
Bowers, Taylor, T Ferguson, Arroyo, N Brown

From the 11:

Mahomes, Herbert
Barkley, Hampton, Pacheco & B Smith, Brian Robinson, Marks
McConkey, Worthy, Flowers, Egbuka, Downs, T Harris, Pierce, Royals
Kelce, Strange, T Ferguson, Gadsden

KC stacks with the mini AZ and big LAC stack.
 
$5 BB SF League from the 5-hole with the first 10 spots being drafted totally by Grok AI (noted by the *)... wild.

QB: Hurts*, Darnold*, Shough, Richardson
RB: Jacobs*, Conner*, Dobbins*, Stevenson, Moss
WR: St. Brown*, Adams*, Godwin*, Coleman, Legette, Bech, Douglas, Hyatt, TeSlaa
TE: Kittle*, Njoku*
 
Here are a couple of my SF BB Tourney drafts with 3 QBs.

2 hour slow from the 6:

Hurts, Nix, Caleb
Taylor, Harvey, Kaleb, B Smith, Brooks, Marks
JSN, DJ Moore, Udunze, Burden, Deebo, Coleman, Mims, Vele
Loveland, Otton, T Ferguson

Live from the 10:

Mahomes, Geno, D Jones
Taylor, Harvey, Kaleb, Skattebo, Giddens
Rice, JSN, Egbuka, Higgins, Pittman, Harris, Bech, Thornton
Bowers, T Ferguson, Gadsden, Sinnott

Live from the 2:

Lamar, Fields, Stroud
Taylor, Skattebo, Tuten, B Smith, K Mitchell, Marks
Wilson, Jamo, Jennings, Odunze, Egbuka, Higgins, TeSlaa
LaPorta, Strange, Taylor, Arroyo
 
barackdhouse said:
But I need to start shooting some "early heavy QB" bullets
Click to expand...


barackdhouse said:
Hurts, Nix, Caleb
Taylor, Harvey, Kaleb, B Smith, Brooks, Marks
JSN, DJ Moore, Udunze, Burden, Deebo, Coleman, Mims, Vele
Loveland, Otton, T Ferguson
Click to expand...

So I was in that draft and kind of chuckled to myself when you started the draft with 3 straight QB's immediately after we had the discussion on 2 vs 3 QB's. You certainly backed up what you said on the comment above your roster I quoted.

And btw I pretty much agreed with almost everything you on those discussions, not really anything I did not agree with might be a better way of saying it.

I'd add since we had that discussion on value of trying to have 3 starter level QB's I drew my first two late first round picks in this format. One was our league where I did take Mahomes in round 2. All my other leagues I drew picks inside the top 7 and went QB in the first round. What I discovered drafting late in round one is if you don't draft Mahomes in round 2, QB can quickly delve into a struggle especially if the rest of the league attacks them in round 3. Can get into a tough situation of filling out the QB spot without feeling like you are reaching.
 
menobrown said:
barackdhouse said:
But I need to start shooting some "early heavy QB" bullets
Click to expand...


barackdhouse said:
Hurts, Nix, Caleb
Taylor, Harvey, Kaleb, B Smith, Brooks, Marks
JSN, DJ Moore, Udunze, Burden, Deebo, Coleman, Mims, Vele
Loveland, Otton, T Ferguson
Click to expand...

So I was in that draft and kind of chuckled to myself when you started the draft with 3 straight QB's immediately after we had the discussion on 2 vs 3 QB's. You certainly backed up what you said on the comment above your roster I quoted.

And btw I pretty much agreed with almost everything you on those discussions, not really anything I did not agree with might be a better way of saying it.

I'd add since we had that discussion on value of trying to have 3 starter level QB's I drew my first two late first round picks in this format. One was our league where I did take Mahomes in round 2. All my other leagues I drew picks inside the top 7 and went QB in the first round. What I discovered drafting late in round one is if you don't draft Mahomes in round 2, QB can quickly delve into a struggle especially if the rest of the league attacks them in round 3. Can get into a tough situation of filling out the QB spot without feeling like you are reaching.
Click to expand...
In the last week in this tourney, I have taken Mahomes in the 2nd round from the 7, 10 and 11. Took Bowers, Bowers and Barkley respectively for my 1st rounders. Yeah the late 1st is where these strategy questions really meet the road. The first half of the 1st is kind of simple - take a QB more than likely. But I've seen that Mahomes is kind of the inflection point for late 1st spots. And it's tough for sure.

In the first one from the 7, I more or less reached for Rice in the 4th (and Worthy in the 6th) rather than take a 3rd QB at that point. But could have had Goff, Stroud, Love or Lawrence instead of Rice. Could have had Ward or Rodgers instead of Worthy. Ended up with just the two QBs (Mahomes and Kyler in the 3rd round).

In the Mahomes build from the 10, I went Bowers/Mahomes/Taylor/Rice/JSN/Geno/Harvey/Kaleb/D Jones - Taylor was a value pick for me. Could have had Purdy or Caleb Williams there but I don't think Taylor should be going as late as he is and is a top tier RB on my board. Reached for Rice for the sake of the stack could have had the usual suspects at QB listed above or Herbert. Took JSN in 5th because he is a top tier WR on my board and didn't think he should be there, plus there were a few QBs left I still liked, including Geno who I figured would fall around the turn and he did. I thought about trying to get two more QBs here but liked the odds of getting Jones later, which I did. Jones is something closer to a late dart throw but I like his odds to win the job for most of the season and really didn't want to go into the "locker room" with another 2QB build.

In the Mahomes build from the 11, I went Barkley/Mahomes/Herbert/McConkey/Hampton and probably reached for McConkey and Hampton for the sake of the stack instead of a 3rd QB like Stroud, Lawrence, Love. (Went Worthy/Kelce 6 & 7 by the way which was nice I thought hehe) and also never ended up with a 3rd QB.
 
barackdhouse said:
But I've seen that Mahomes is kind of the inflection point for late 1st spots.
Click to expand...
Yep and the first time in round 2 I was faced with the decision(our draft) I took him and in hindsight was glad I did.

Second time I was faced with the decision I'm not sure yet, draft is still going and I got a highly unusual start to the team build where after the top 7 picks I had no TE's or WR's. Out of the 12 spot I passed Mahomes for CMC at the 1/2 turn. Left round 4 with just one QB(Maye), reached for Geno at the 5/6 turn who at the time was one of the last 3 QB's I felt secure owned the starting job all year if healthy(Rodgers and Darnold the other two). At that point I thought I was screwed at QB with a fairly weak Maye and Geno duo with no viable third. Feel like I got "saved" having Darnold make it back to me at the 7/8 turn.


barackdhouse said:
In the first one from the 7, I more or less reached for Rice in the 4th (and Worthy in the 6th) rather than take a 3rd QB at that point.
Click to expand...
Same decision I faced of course and I chose to go ahead and reach on Rice but pass on Worthy and Kelce who I had a chance to draft at ADP(6th and 8th). The primary reason for passing is I just had other players I liked a lot more but the other part of it was the notion that if Rice bust for injury or whatever reasons it's probably a boon for Kelce but if Rice continues his target monster hogging ways it's terrible for Kelce and not exactly ideal for Worthy. So reaching for Rice but avoiding the other two is my way of NOT playing it safe, and just going all in on Rice being such a big factor it takes a lot of shine of the other two.


barackdhouse said:
Jones is something closer to a late dart throw but I like his odds to win the job for most of the season and really didn't want to go into the "locker room" with another 2QB build.
Click to expand...
I did something similar in our draft when I was staring at a 2 QB start but went the other way with Richardson. I prefer Richardson out of the two, I'm of the opinion they both start games and prefer the guy I view as having more upside. But had AR been gone with what was left I'd have taken Jones.


barackdhouse said:
2QB - 5
3QB - 4
4QB - 1
Click to expand...
I got one still going but I won't be picking another QB.

So right now 7 drafts into it and I drafted 3 QB's in 6 of them and 4 QB's in one of them but it's not 3 or more guaranteed starting QB's in all of them.

My first one, the one I took 4 QB's, I did a Shough/Rattler combo.

Richardson as QB3 as discussed is what I view as a "sometimes at best" having 3 starting QB's.

And one draft I took Malik Willis in round 20 as QB3 as a safety play since Love was my second QB. I had a heavy GB stack and if Love was out for the end of the season I'd be toast because Willis can't support the stack but I decided to blow a 20th round pick in case Love should miss some time earlier in the season I thought Willis would keep me in the game.

Anyway it's been a fun contest to draft but I just got back in my first non-SF draft in weeks and it's kind of messing with my head adjusting from having so much talent in the later rounds of SF fall to you with the QB's pushing people up.
 
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
 
menobrown said:
barackdhouse said:
But I've seen that Mahomes is kind of the inflection point for late 1st spots.
Click to expand...
Yep and the first time in round 2 I was faced with the decision(our draft) I took him and in hindsight was glad I did.

Second time I was faced with the decision I'm not sure yet, draft is still going and I got a highly unusual start to the team build where after the top 7 picks I had no TE's or WR's. Out of the 12 spot I passed Mahomes for CMC at the 1/2 turn. Left round 4 with just one QB(Maye), reached for Geno at the 5/6 turn who at the time was one of the last 3 QB's I felt secure owned the starting job all year if healthy(Rodgers and Darnold the other two). At that point I thought I was screwed at QB with a fairly weak Maye and Geno duo with no viable third. Feel like I got "saved" having Darnold make it back to me at the 7/8 turn.


barackdhouse said:
In the first one from the 7, I more or less reached for Rice in the 4th (and Worthy in the 6th) rather than take a 3rd QB at that point.
Click to expand...
Same decision I faced of course and I chose to go ahead and reach on Rice but pass on Worthy and Kelce who I had a chance to draft at ADP(6th and 8th). The primary reason for passing is I just had other players I liked a lot more but the other part of it was the notion that if Rice bust for injury or whatever reasons it's probably a boon for Kelce but if Rice continues his target monster hogging ways it's terrible for Kelce and not exactly ideal for Worthy. So reaching for Rice but avoiding the other two is my way of NOT playing it safe, and just going all in on Rice being such a big factor it takes a lot of shine of the other two.

barackdhouse said:
Jones is something closer to a late dart throw but I like his odds to win the job for most of the season and really didn't want to go into the "locker room" with another 2QB build.
Click to expand...
I did something similar in our draft when I was staring at a 2 QB start but went the other way with Richardson. I prefer Richardson out of the two, I'm of the opinion they both start games and prefer the guy I view as having more upside. But had AR been gone with what was left I'd have taken Jones.

Richardson as QB3 as discussed is what I view as a "sometimes at best" having 3 starting QB's.
Click to expand...
Yeah I will fire some with Jones and some with Richardson but up to this point in the offseason I'm probably overweight on Richardson (in other formats overall anyway). I am rooting for Richardson but hedging with Jones at the moment even though I think he has a chance to just win it outright.
 
Saint said:
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
Click to expand...
Hopefully I can stay up late enough to get the invite link
 
menobrown said:
barackdhouse said:
In the first one from the 7, I more or less reached for Rice in the 4th (and Worthy in the 6th) rather than take a 3rd QB at that point.
Click to expand...
Same decision I faced of course and I chose to go ahead and reach on Rice but pass on Worthy and Kelce who I had a chance to draft at ADP(6th and 8th). The primary reason for passing is I just had other players I liked a lot more but the other part of it was the notion that if Rice bust for injury or whatever reasons it's probably a boon for Kelce but if Rice continues his target monster hogging ways it's terrible for Kelce and not exactly ideal for Worthy. So reaching for Rice but avoiding the other two is my way of NOT playing it safe, and just going all in on Rice being such a big factor it takes a lot of shine of the other two.
Click to expand...
Yeah it's actually fairly rare I complete a stack with anything more than like a couple targets in the offense. It's hard to do. Looking at the board you and I were in together and where you took Mahomes in the 2nd from the 9 spot - I think that is the draft you're referencing here... it looks like you took James Cook in the 6th over the possibility of Worthy. Makes sense to me. I've got him higher than Worthy and RB scarcity being what it is and you being in the 6th round with only one on your roster at that point (Barkley)... it kind of feels like reaching for Worthy is a bit too far doesn't it? Rhetorical. There are a couple other WRs and RBs I like in that spot as well.

Going all-in on Rice vs the others is exactly what I'm talking about when I say to commit to a scenario. And especially when it comes to the question of not reaching too far when there are other players that we think are better etc. The counterpoint here is kind of strong though, which is that even if we had a crystal ball and knew with 100% certainty that your breakdown of Rice dominating targets were going to come true... you'd still possibly, likely, maybe, want to have stacks with Worthy/Kelce/Pacheco (and the longer shot KC guys) because it is best ball and even if Worthy and Kelce have meh years they're presumably going to have big weeks, and we will need those weeks to advance in the playoffs. All it takes is Worthy or Kelce to have one, just one week where they outscore Rice during the fantasy playoffs and the teams that only have Rice are sunk. All other things being equal which we know they're not. *this is ALL sort of assuming KC is going to be an important part of the playoff winning formula, if they're not then it's all moot anyway*

When I took my share of Worthy to go with Rice and Mahomes, Cook had gone a round+ earlier. You got really good value on him. There actually weren't other names on the board I liked better than Worthy when he came up OTC mid 6th for me. Metcalf I had a notch higher and was available but that's a small gap to go ahead and reach for the stack. Could have had Kelce instead of Worthy but also already had Bowers in that one and really didn't need another TE. In yours you had taken Kittle which presumably also gave you a bit of a feeling of luxury of not needing to grab Kelce.
Anyway I'm writing novels again here.
 
Saint said:
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
Click to expand...
Draft should be starting soon.
 
Saint said:
Saint said:
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
Click to expand...
Draft should be starting soon.
Click to expand...
Looks like we’re missing 1 team somehow. Any clue on who, @Saint ?
 
joey said:
Saint said:
Saint said:
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
Click to expand...
Draft should be starting soon.
Click to expand...
Looks like we’re missing 1 team somehow. Any clue on who, @Saint ?
Click to expand...
Yup. I’ve been chatting with FFPC and waiting for them to add the owner and withdraw funds.
 
joey said:
Saint said:
Saint said:
Saint said:
I reached out to the FFPC. Waiting to hear the release schedule but we have 100% FBG league now. Here's the final members:
  1. @barackdhouse
  2. @joey
  3. @Raging weasel
  4. @IHEARTFF
  5. @NE_REVIVAL
  6. @Saint
  7. @C & C
  8. @Marauder
  9. @FreeBaGeL
  10. @TripItUp
  11. @menobrown
  12. @OldMilwaukee
I asked for a launch date at 12 PM EST today with the 2-hr timer. I will keep you all informed.
Click to expand...
FFPC confirmed they will have the league up between 10-11 PM EST tonight. I believe the pause is from 2am - 8am… so once you see your draft spot, be aware of the timer.
Click to expand...
Draft should be starting soon.
Click to expand...
Looks like we’re missing 1 team somehow. Any clue on who, @Saint ?
Click to expand...
I have not received an invite or link or anything
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Raging weasel
Anyone have a worse team than this?
Replies
5
Views
277
Raging weasel
Raging weasel
barackdhouse
My final rostership #s in BestBall
Replies
11
Views
401
Deamon
D
C
Super flex 1.02 rookie draft 2025
Replies
17
Views
1K
FreeBaGeL
FreeBaGeL

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top