Ghost Rider
Footballguy
We can put you on mute? Suh-weet!If you don't like the topic, or what I have to say, leave or put me on mute.
We can put you on mute? Suh-weet!If you don't like the topic, or what I have to say, leave or put me on mute.
The overturn on the Holmes catch at the Goal line was an absolute joke.
I dont think there was enough evidence on the replay to overturn the call either way. Thats the rule, whether or not its a good one, it is the rule and by no means should've been overturnedThe overturn on the Holmes catch at the Goal line was an absolute joke.But it is a stupid rule that needs to be re-visited. By the strictest interpretation, it was the correct reversal.
No it wasn't. There was not "indisputable visual evidence" to overturn the call on the field.Officiating has been horrible. Hopefully this Superbowl won't be as tainted as the last time Pitt was there.The overturn on the Holmes catch at the Goal line was an absolute joke.But it is a stupid rule that needs to be re-visited. By the strictest interpretation, it was the correct reversal.
"The ruling on the field is the ball was out of bounds". That's exactly what the official said. He said nothing about the ball touching an Eagles player who was out of bounds. I've reviewed the play 4 times on HD and the ball definitely landed in bounds. It's inconclusive whether or not the ball bounced up and touched the Eagles player's arm while his foot was out of bounds.Far from perfectly called. The perfect call would have been to let the play run to conclusion and then review the play. That's what the refs are instructed to do on borderline calls like that.It was out on the player who touched it. The ball was on the 26. It was perfectly called by the refs.However, I don't like the lack of review.The ball was in play and touched by an Eagle while he was out of bounds. That's what happened. Whatever the rule is in that situation is the proper call. I don't know off the top of my head if that's Eagle ball at the 26 or 40, but I'd bet those are the two options.
I'm going to have to agree with these guys. I do concede that HD replay is making it more difficult. However, calls like the TD in the first pit/bal game are nothing but equal to judicial legislation -- they are just purely making stuff up. There was nothing indisputable at all about that.Hochuli. McCauley missing the delay of game against Bal...Pereira admitting it...then being rewarded with the Super Bowl...I don't think high resolution has #### to do with it. There are a disturbing number of bad calls lately. I'm not talking about 1/4 inch stuff. But, hey, agree to disagree.I disagree. Having dozens of high-definition replay angles makes it a lot easier to nit-pick whether or not the football grazed a blade of grass before it was caught or broke the plane of the goalline by 1/4 inch. The refs are doing the best they can given all the chaos going on around them.I don't disagree with this at all. I have seen some ridiculous #### in college games, including a ref tacking a player this year.I do think the NFL could train their refs a little better maybe. They may have become complacent. Seriously, a lot of us have been watching football for a long time.. the refs are getting worse... that is indisputable.I doubt their replacements would do any better. Being a ref is ####### hard...
Getting every play called 100% correctly in every game is the goal but it will never happen as long as humans are officiating the game. Blown calls, missed calls and bad calls have been part of sports since sports began and will continue forever.The officials did not cost the Eagles the game -- they had plenty of opportunites to win the game but did not execute well enough.I think of these calls from the perspective of a player. Why play the game if it is not going to be called correctly. If it takes 25 minutes to get a call correct, then you take 25 minutes.
If not, then as a player or coach, what am I on this field for? If I have no faith that every play will be called correctly, and that a call like the one yesterday may determine the outcome of an NFC Title Game, then there is no reason to play the game.
If the game takes 5 hours to get a call like that right, fine by me.
Umm....he was CLEARLY hit BEFORE he got both feet down. He was clearly going to the ground as a result of that hit.I hate the rule myself, and think it's ridiculous that a play like this is "incomplete", but by the rules, and teh interpretation explained dozens of times throughout the season (including by Perreria), it WAS INCOMPLETE. CLEARLY.T Love said:No it wasn't. There was not "indisputable visual evidence" to overturn the call on the field.Officiating has been horrible. Hopefully this Superbowl won't be as tainted as the last time Pitt was there.renesauz said:JSH21 said:The overturn on the Holmes catch at the Goal line was an absolute joke.But it is a stupid rule that needs to be re-visited. By the strictest interpretation, it was the correct reversal.
I agree....but as a ref, when you know a call is wrong. common sense should rule, not the NFL rulebook on what is and is not reviewable. EVERY PLAY / SITUATION SHOULD BE REVIEWABLE.As a coach, I might just pull my team off the field -- if the game is not going to be called with common sense and an eye towards getting the call right -- then why are we playing?Godsbrother said:Getting every play called 100% correctly in every game is the goal but it will never happen as long as humans are officiating the game. Blown calls, missed calls and bad calls have been part of sports since sports began and will continue forever.The officials did not cost the Eagles the game -- they had plenty of opportunites to win the game but did not execute well enough.Kevin Ashcraft said:I think of these calls from the perspective of a player. Why play the game if it is not going to be called correctly. If it takes 25 minutes to get a call correct, then you take 25 minutes.
If not, then as a player or coach, what am I on this field for? If I have no faith that every play will be called correctly, and that a call like the one yesterday may determine the outcome of an NFC Title Game, then there is no reason to play the game.
If the game takes 5 hours to get a call like that right, fine by me.
That was terrible. That official should be fired for that one. Just brutal. Especially in the playoffs when they let more go than normal. No possible justification for that call.I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere...But the WORST call of the weekend was the roughing the kicker penalty on Baltimore against Pittsburgh's punter just before the first half ended. That was a phantom penalty like no other. And I'm not a Ravens or Steelers fan. Just an awful call.