This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
But the thing about Dilfer........do you think someone was going to take him before your next pick.......if not why draft him where you did.I don't even think Dilfer's going to be that horrible, I kind of like him.....more than Boller. Anyway, I think you could have had him a little later.
You guys are to much. It's like every excuse involves porn. Hey, I'm late..........just looking at some porn. Like that makes up for everything.No big deal, the draft will move on. Hope you enjoyed the porn, pr0n, porno, or nude pictures.Sorry for the dlays - There's some good pr0n being PM'ed tonight, not to mention some quality Forrest mailApparently the FFA owners are so scared that they refuse to make any more draft picks.
.
eens:
That's not it EBF, they need to go do some research because the magazines they're drafting from only gives out the top 20 at each position.Apparently the FFA owners are so scared that they refuse to make any more draft picks.
Good pick
.
Get used to it, and it'll be nothing like the final result.I know I've only been part of this league for a few rounds now, but this is getting a little embarrassing for the FFA team. Kutta was our man that was quick with his picks... he's probably tied up in some DCAA audit of one of his contracts
My pick window was from 2 AM to 8 AM. C'mon. Give a brother a break! I gotta sleep sometime. And our DCAA audits were a couple months ago, we we are in the clear for awhile.My picks are:I know I've only been part of this league for a few rounds now, but this is getting a little embarrassing for the FFA team. Kutta was our man that was quick with his picks... he's probably tied up in some DCAA audit of one of his contracts
I really like where Glenn (and Galloway) is going in drafts. Big value there. I almost took Glenn with my last pick but thought he stood a bigger chance of dropping to my next pick than Galloway did. I was targeting Stevens late in the draft. Just my luck he happens to be on TV and looks good...and reminds somebody to draft him. <_<
I thought the timer would be turned off at night. I have it set that way. But then I noticed this statement from MFL the other day."Hint: The draft timer will not be suspended in the live draft chat room. The timer only suspends for long-running, email-type drafts."My pick window was from 2 AM to 8 AM. C'mon. Give a brother a break! I gotta sleep sometime. And our DCAA audits were a couple months ago, we we are in the clear for awhile.My picks are:I know I've only been part of this league for a few rounds now, but this is getting a little embarrassing for the FFA team. Kutta was our man that was quick with his picks... he's probably tied up in some DCAA audit of one of his contracts
Kevin Curtis, WR Rams
Frank Gore, RB 49ers
I am not sure how to make my missed pick, so I am posting them here before I pick.
Maybe we should consider turning off the timer at night?
Not sure. It sounds like maybe we are doing a live draft with a long time between picks, instead of a "long-running, email-type draft." Is there an option as to what kind of draft you can do when you set things up?I thought the timer would be turned off at night. I have it set that way. But then I noticed this statement from MFL the other day."Hint: The draft timer will not be suspended in the live draft chat room. The timer only suspends for long-running, email-type drafts."My pick window was from 2 AM to 8 AM. C'mon. Give a brother a break! I gotta sleep sometime. And our DCAA audits were a couple months ago, we we are in the clear for awhile.My picks are:I know I've only been part of this league for a few rounds now, but this is getting a little embarrassing for the FFA team. Kutta was our man that was quick with his picks... he's probably tied up in some DCAA audit of one of his contracts
Kevin Curtis, WR Rams
Frank Gore, RB 49ers
I am not sure how to make my missed pick, so I am posting them here before I pick.
Maybe we should consider turning off the timer at night?
WTF does that mean?
I don't think so.Not sure. It sounds like maybe we are doing a live draft with a long time between picks, instead of a "long-running, email-type draft." Is there an option as to what kind of draft you can do when you set things up?I thought the timer would be turned off at night. I have it set that way. But then I noticed this statement from MFL the other day."Hint: The draft timer will not be suspended in the live draft chat room. The timer only suspends for long-running, email-type drafts."My pick window was from 2 AM to 8 AM. C'mon. Give a brother a break! I gotta sleep sometime. And our DCAA audits were a couple months ago, we we are in the clear for awhile.My picks are:I know I've only been part of this league for a few rounds now, but this is getting a little embarrassing for the FFA team. Kutta was our man that was quick with his picks... he's probably tied up in some DCAA audit of one of his contracts
Kevin Curtis, WR Rams
Frank Gore, RB 49ers
I am not sure how to make my missed pick, so I am posting them here before I pick.
Maybe we should consider turning off the timer at night?
WTF does that mean?
IMO this is late in the draft.
? They're so money when it comes to drafting.
Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
went into the settings and told it to suspend the timer overnight. it had been set to run non-stop.I thought you had it set up to suspend overnight originally so I have no idea why it wasn't set that way anymore.
Imp works a wierd shift, so we expected problems...
............and we're drafting against the FFA and we expected problems. I wasn't asked last year to be on the Shark Pool team because I was any good. I was asked because they thought I had patience. They just wanted some warm bodies that could put up with this style of drafting...........freaken timing out all the time.........apologies always flying, the common reason pr0n. Whatever, like I said earlier, we're watching. I'm still not convinced this entire debacle isn't somehow premeditated. But then again I don't know how you could plan such a mess.Imp works a wierd shift, so we expected problems...
What do you mean, "you just missed it?" How do you just miss it.......I don't get it?
So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
I don't think either are bad picks, but I don't feel like they were stolen from me. Do we even know that Jacobs would get the job if Tiki went down? Not dropping names, but I think Cloud would factor strongly into the Giants backfield sans Barber. That's why Jacobs wasn't/isn't on my radar.I'll confess to knowing little to nothing about Moats. I know Buck is hurting, and I remember Mehe was hyped last year or the year before on these boards. Too much is up in the air for me to roll the dice on Moats. If someone knows something I don't about Moats having the inside track on the #2 job, that's a helluva pick.So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
You sure have a funny definition of "handcuff" for a "shark." 
Whatever, like I said earlier, we're watching.
In case you missed it, neither were selected as handcuffs. Moats is EBF's 4th RB, and in my humble guppy opinion, Ladell Betts might have been a better pick for him (as a handcuff to Portis). Jacobs is Rad's 5th RB, which I think is a good value flyer for this part of the draft.
forget about the backup job, jacobs is pushing for time as part of a thunder/lightning attack. barber has said he think jacobs is going to help him extend his career. moats has been described as everything from a "piece of gristle" to a "stick of dynamite". im not saying he looks even close to as good as barry sanders, but he has almost the exact same build and running style - low, tough, great cuts and vision, and good acceleration once he gets to the edge. i see big things in his future, and think he can put up westbrook's numbers if westbrook gets hurt. i dont know if he will get the carries in cbuck's absence - childress has said moats does provide a differnt look than westy, but theres also scuttlebutt that theyre looking at guys like gordon, morris, levens, and hambrick to fill buck's role. either way, moats should at least get a few touches a game to show what he's got and if he continues to flash what he has shown so far, that number will quickly increase.I don't think either are bad picks, but I don't feel like they were stolen from me. Do we even know that Jacobs would get the job if Tiki went down? Not dropping names, but I think Cloud would factor strongly into the Giants backfield sans Barber. That's why Jacobs wasn't/isn't on my radar.I'll confess to knowing little to nothing about Moats. I know Buck is hurting, and I remember Mehe was hyped last year or the year before on these boards. Too much is up in the air for me to roll the dice on Moats. If someone knows something I don't about Moats having the inside track on the #2 job, that's a helluva pick.So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
PRESEASON HYPEforget about the backup job, jacobs is pushing for time as part of a thunder/lightning attack. barber has said he think jacobs is going to help him extend his career. moats has been described as everything from a "piece of gristle" to a "stick of dynamite". im not saying he looks even close to as good as barry sanders, but he has almost the exact same build and running style - low, tough, great cuts and vision, and good acceleration once he gets to the edge. i see big things in his future, and think he can put up westbrook's numbers if westbrook gets hurt. i dont know if he will get the carries in cbuck's absence - childress has said moats does provide a differnt look than westy, but theres also scuttlebutt that theyre looking at guys like gordon, morris, levens, and hambrick to fill buck's role. either way, moats should at least get a few touches a game to show what he's got and if he continues to flash what he has shown so far, that number will quickly increase.I don't think either are bad picks, but I don't feel like they were stolen from me. Do we even know that Jacobs would get the job if Tiki went down? Not dropping names, but I think Cloud would factor strongly into the Giants backfield sans Barber. That's why Jacobs wasn't/isn't on my radar.I'll confess to knowing little to nothing about Moats. I know Buck is hurting, and I remember Mehe was hyped last year or the year before on these boards. Too much is up in the air for me to roll the dice on Moats. If someone knows something I don't about Moats having the inside track on the #2 job, that's a helluva pick.So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
Don't even bother explaining to this FFA group Bloom, they'll figure it out.......slowly.forget about the backup job, jacobs is pushing for time as part of a thunder/lightning attack. barber has said he think jacobs is going to help him extend his career. moats has been described as everything from a "piece of gristle" to a "stick of dynamite". im not saying he looks even close to as good as barry sanders, but he has almost the exact same build and running style - low, tough, great cuts and vision, and good acceleration once he gets to the edge. i see big things in his future, and think he can put up westbrook's numbers if westbrook gets hurt. i dont know if he will get the carries in cbuck's absence - childress has said moats does provide a differnt look than westy, but theres also scuttlebutt that theyre looking at guys like gordon, morris, levens, and hambrick to fill buck's role. either way, moats should at least get a few touches a game to show what he's got and if he continues to flash what he has shown so far, that number will quickly increase.I don't think either are bad picks, but I don't feel like they were stolen from me. Do we even know that Jacobs would get the job if Tiki went down? Not dropping names, but I think Cloud would factor strongly into the Giants backfield sans Barber. That's why Jacobs wasn't/isn't on my radar.I'll confess to knowing little to nothing about Moats. I know Buck is hurting, and I remember Mehe was hyped last year or the year before on these boards. Too much is up in the air for me to roll the dice on Moats. If someone knows something I don't about Moats having the inside track on the #2 job, that's a helluva pick.So basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
I know they weren't selected as handcuffs, that's the entire point of my post. It stems from what Kutta and Tgunz said earlier regarding the two.
I'm a little slow at times, you'll have to explain this to me, I don't followSo basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
OK. I'll talk really slowly.Priest + LJ = HandcuffI'm a little slow at times, you'll have to explain this to me, I don't followSo basically handcuffing veteran running backs to rookie Rb's is a bad idea late in the draft?Yeah, those guys are gonna see tons of PT - playing beind two of the leading RB's last year. Just the kind of guys I want on my team. Nice job SPBrandon Jacobs was a nice selection Rad..........so was Moats EBF.
Tommy could have had them both, I was surprised he chose to simply ignore them.
The Shark Pool just swooped in for the kill on that one.
Is everyone in this draft well aware that there's this thing called a predraft function on MFL? Get your #### together guys. 
I was gonna take Engram but didn't think to post it, I just PM'd Sfax with it... 
