rockaction
Footballguy
I've been reading lately about the K-12 bills to prevent the teaching of CRT, and I must say that I find the language a disaster. All I had to do was glance at the North Carolina bill to find this as its first clause. It prevents one from teaching:
"One race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex"
My Spidey senses swirled with how much of a problem just a sentence like this, no matter how good in intention, was obtusely conceived for pragmatic enforcement. This is going to be a witch hunt under these laws of teachers tasked with talking about any differences between the sexes or races anywhere. It's anti-science and anti-free speech, these bills. They're a mess coming from the fringes of the myopic left and right. Education is local, and states promulgating these standards are completely missing the boat.
Just awful.
How is one to teach about gender differences in IQ, or athletic accomplishments by sex and race? This is Orwellian stuff here.
"One race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex"
My Spidey senses swirled with how much of a problem just a sentence like this, no matter how good in intention, was obtusely conceived for pragmatic enforcement. This is going to be a witch hunt under these laws of teachers tasked with talking about any differences between the sexes or races anywhere. It's anti-science and anti-free speech, these bills. They're a mess coming from the fringes of the myopic left and right. Education is local, and states promulgating these standards are completely missing the boat.
Just awful.
How is one to teach about gender differences in IQ, or athletic accomplishments by sex and race? This is Orwellian stuff here.
Last edited by a moderator: