Faulk? cmon now. I know over the years Faulk has been a sneaky WW plugin at RB due to his PPR value but he's old now and Caddy is far better than Faulk.You're right Caddy didn't have a good year last year and I too would like to see more from the TB GM about building them a line. However I think complicated Gruden inadvertently made their offense too simple last year. No one was scared of the pass until Galloway burned them, if he did. Their QBs left alot to be desired so the Ds were all over Caddy. I expect him to have learned from that and improve a bit. One year earlier, remember, when they went with a normal O (the rook) Caddy openned the season in a real impressive way. The enormous talent is there. I'm not saying he's a top 5 back, 21 seems too low. If his ADP is 21 and you've got him 21, strongly consider him.I haven't seen significant enough changes in the line nor the offensive scheme in TB.http://www.xpertsports.com/league/player.p...Ca00&full=1I wholeheartedly agree with this one. Caddy's on a bunch of my teams and I've been able to draft him at 3.06 or later in 16 teamers. Means he should be there at the beginning of the 4th in 12s. He's a steal there.caddy's too talented to be 21 IMO
Cadillac's stats were SO bad last year. I would rather take my chance with a WR in round 3 and get the same production from Kevin Faulk.
BTW thus far, Hairston looks explosive every time he touches the ball. I believe that's exactly what was written at patriots.com. He's sure impressing. Morris is getting time playing the feature back role(Maroney out briefly) and the Faulk role in NE. The PPR Faulk value type player from NE might just be Morris this year. I strongly doubt it's Faulk anymore.