What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W2 - San Francisco V Seattle (1 Viewer)

Refs are screwing Seattle out of a big lead. First a BS taunting penalty by Peterson after a 3rd down sack and another BS PI call on Kelly Jennings.
Didn't we score after a fumble a few plays after that?
The next play, but it's cacksman, he doesn't see things the same as others. He's still convinced SA is a good RB. What he probably should've said was the non call false start on Gore's 21 yard first down that led to a FG. Bad call on taunting but didn't negatively affect the score.There's a non PI call, horrible reffing today.
Get real guy. I was just stating an example of some horrible reffing that has gone SFs way. I know they scored the next play. You give Seahawk fans on this board a bad name. Please leave and dont come back. :rolleyes:
:hot: Overreact much? Oh yeah, that's what you do. That's like the Lions calling your organization "poorly run". There were some good Seahawk posters back before you and Enforcer joined up.
So your idea is to alienate every other Seahawk poster on this forum? Why even bother posting here?
 
Refs are screwing Seattle out of a big lead. First a BS taunting penalty by Peterson after a 3rd down sack and another BS PI call on Kelly Jennings.
Didn't we score after a fumble a few plays after that?
The next play, but it's cacksman, he doesn't see things the same as others. He's still convinced SA is a good RB. What he probably should've said was the non call false start on Gore's 21 yard first down that led to a FG. Bad call on taunting but didn't negatively affect the score.There's a non PI call, horrible reffing today.
Get real guy. I was just stating an example of some horrible reffing that has gone SFs way. I know they scored the next play. You give Seahawk fans on this board a bad name. Please leave and dont come back. :shrug:
:lmao: Overreact much? Oh yeah, that's what you do. That's like the Lions calling your organization "poorly run". There were some good Seahawk posters back before you and Enforcer joined up.
So your idea is to alienate every other Seahawk poster on this forum? Why even bother posting here?
No,just distance myself from you two. Wasn't saying that current Seahawk homers weren't good posters, just that the percentage of good to bad has gone down with recent additions and losses.
 
Refs are screwing Seattle out of a big lead. First a BS taunting penalty by Peterson after a 3rd down sack and another BS PI call on Kelly Jennings.
Didn't we score after a fumble a few plays after that?
The next play, but it's cacksman, he doesn't see things the same as others. He's still convinced SA is a good RB. What he probably should've said was the non call false start on Gore's 21 yard first down that led to a FG. Bad call on taunting but didn't negatively affect the score.There's a non PI call, horrible reffing today.
Get real guy. I was just stating an example of some horrible reffing that has gone SFs way. I know they scored the next play. You give Seahawk fans on this board a bad name. Please leave and dont come back. :X
:shrug: Overreact much? Oh yeah, that's what you do. That's like the Lions calling your organization "poorly run". There were some good Seahawk posters back before you and Enforcer joined up.
So your idea is to alienate every other Seahawk poster on this forum? Why even bother posting here?
No,just distance myself from you two. Wasn't saying that current Seahawk homers weren't good posters, just that the percentage of good to bad has gone down with recent additions and losses.
Are you sure you even like the Seahawks? It seems like everything you post is littered with pessimism towards Seattle. Maybe youre a closet Niner fan? Go to them, they can have you. :X
 
Refs are screwing Seattle out of a big lead. First a BS taunting penalty by Peterson after a 3rd down sack and another BS PI call on Kelly Jennings.
Didn't we score after a fumble a few plays after that?
The next play, but it's cacksman, he doesn't see things the same as others. He's still convinced SA is a good RB. What he probably should've said was the non call false start on Gore's 21 yard first down that led to a FG. Bad call on taunting but didn't negatively affect the score.There's a non PI call, horrible reffing today.
Get real guy. I was just stating an example of some horrible reffing that has gone SFs way. I know they scored the next play. You give Seahawk fans on this board a bad name. Please leave and dont come back. :towelwave:
:shrug: Overreact much? Oh yeah, that's what you do. That's like the Lions calling your organization "poorly run". There were some good Seahawk posters back before you and Enforcer joined up.
So your idea is to alienate every other Seahawk poster on this forum? Why even bother posting here?
No,just distance myself from you two. Wasn't saying that current Seahawk homers weren't good posters, just that the percentage of good to bad has gone down with recent additions and losses.
Are you sure you even like the Seahawks? It seems like everything you post is littered with pessimism towards Seattle. Maybe youre a closet Niner fan? Go to them, they can have you. :banned:
Sorry if I let reason, logic and observation and not naive blind homerism color my posts. I can't just rely on "I like the Seahawks so they're great" like you do to make my decisions. I've been rocking the Hawks long before you even heard about this site.
 
O'Sullivan scramble, then 17 yd pass to Gore.

Wow.

...then Nedney with the 41 yd miss.

 
Is JTO that mobile? 32 yards rushing along with a -7 sack just recently?
Seattle has 8 sacks for pete sake!
hopefully a few of these were through Vernon, so Martz might rethink keeping him in to block, as that is the only thing that makes sense for a donut???
I loved all the hype about Martz utilizing VD. No thanks....
He's had at least 5 targets. Either the passes were off target or VD flubbed the catch on all of them.
 
Is JTO that mobile? 32 yards rushing along with a -7 sack just recently?
Seattle has 8 sacks for pete sake!
hopefully a few of these were through Vernon, so Martz might rethink keeping him in to block, as that is the only thing that makes sense for a donut???
I loved all the hype about Martz utilizing VD. No thanks....
He's had at least 5 targets. Either the passes were off target or VD flubbed the catch on all of them.
For as much love as Martz was giving him in the press 5 targets is not a lot. Particularly in a high scoring game....
 
I was at the Monday nighter last year when Seattle obliterated Alex Smith and the 9ers. This game was LIGHT YEARS more entertaining, and I'm pretty thrilled as a 49er fan.

 
TheFanatic said:
Twilight said:
TheFanatic said:
Hipple said:
the spanker said:
TheFanatic said:
Is JTO that mobile? 32 yards rushing along with a -7 sack just recently?
Seattle has 8 sacks for pete sake!
hopefully a few of these were through Vernon, so Martz might rethink keeping him in to block, as that is the only thing that makes sense for a donut???
I loved all the hype about Martz utilizing VD. No thanks....
He's had at least 5 targets. Either the passes were off target or VD flubbed the catch on all of them.
For as much love as Martz was giving him in the press 5 targets is not a lot. Particularly in a high scoring game....
Sucks from a FF standpoint, but when they are murdering the QB like that, I don't blame Martz for keeping him in.
 
mad sweeney said:
There were some good Seahawk posters back before you and Enforcer joined up.
Wow. That's brutal. I'm sorry you feel this way. I seem to remember that we disagreed about something in the past, but you must hold a pretty serious grudge to say that.I like to think I've got a pretty good feel for the team, and don't have a tough time looking at my favorite team from a fairly objective viewpoint. I've been watching them since the early 80s. :goodposting:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top