Bullcarp a runningback can reach over the goalline and cross it, loss the ball during it and its call a TD. But u can't catch a ball with 2 feet down and 3 second later come down and the ball come out when your hand with the ball comes down and it an incomplete pass.. B.S. They need to change this crap..
Running plays can't be incomplete passes, so that's the difference. I think the rule could stand some revision,
but the rule would be even worse if it ended the play and awarded a touchdown to any receiver who gets two hands on the ball in the end zone. JMHO.
Why? Do you have an aversion to consistency? There's not a single other situation in the NFL where a guy with possession of the football doesn't get the TD if he crosses the plane. It's a stupid rule. Get two feet down with control and you've caught the ball. End of story.
The reason the current rule is imperfect is that it doesn't fit with what everybody "just knows" to be a catch. It conflicts with our intuitions.An alternative rule that made a touchdown out of any play where a receiver had two feet down with the ball in his hands in the end zone would be at least as imperfect in that regard, IMO. There are a lot of plays that everybody "just knows" is an incomplete pass, which that alternative rule would consider at touchdown instead.
A rule that conforms to people's intuitions in all situations would be extremely difficult to draft. The current rule needs to be improved. But improving it will not be nearly as easy a job as many people think, IMO.