What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W9 - San Diego V Houston (1 Viewer)

Bullcarp a runningback can reach over the goalline and cross it, loss the ball during it and its call a TD. But u can't catch a ball with 2 feet down and 3 second later come down and the ball come out when your hand with the ball comes down and it an incomplete pass.. B.S. They need to change this crap..
Running plays can't be incomplete passes, so that's the difference. I think the rule could stand some revision, but the rule would be even worse if it ended the play and awarded a touchdown to any receiver who gets two hands on the ball in the end zone. JMHO.
Why? Do you have an aversion to consistency? There's not a single other situation in the NFL where a guy with possession of the football doesn't get the TD if he crosses the plane. It's a stupid rule. Get two feet down with control and you've caught the ball. End of story.
The reason the current rule is imperfect is that it doesn't fit with what everybody "just knows" to be a catch. It conflicts with our intuitions.An alternative rule that made a touchdown out of any play where a receiver had two feet down with the ball in his hands in the end zone would be at least as imperfect in that regard, IMO. There are a lot of plays that everybody "just knows" is an incomplete pass, which that alternative rule would consider at touchdown instead.

A rule that conforms to people's intuitions in all situations would be extremely difficult to draft. The current rule needs to be improved. But improving it will not be nearly as easy a job as many people think, IMO.
There will always be "close plays", but one of the biggest virtues of a rule is clarity, where it removes discretion. When in doubt about what a rule should say, go with clarity. This rule is overly concerned about the relatively few plays that, as you said, we "just know" don't look like a catch, and is built around those exceptions. It's asinine. Watching an NFL game anymore feels like watching oral argument before the Supreme Court. I can't think of another sport that requires that you know such an intricate and lengthy set of rules just to watch the average game. It's ridiculous.

 
Can you run the ball in and lose possesion and it is a TD?
Yes. A run can't be an incomplete pass. As soon as the ball crosses the plane in the hands of a runner, it's a touchdown. But in order for it to be a touchdown on a passing play, not only does the ball have to cross the plane, but it also has to be a complete pass. Regardless of where the play occurs on the field, if a player is in the act of falling when he catches the ball, it's an incomplete pass unless he maintains control of the ball all the way through his fall.
Thanks, I just have never really seen it before this year. So it is a judgement call as to when the play is actually over? For instance, a player catches the ball in the end zone and goes to celebrate with a teammate in the endzone and when running to his teammate knocks the ball against his leg and drops it...incomplete pass?
 
Ryan Mathews still in the locker room to start the 2nd half, looking at right ankle. Sproles in for a pass, Tolbert in for a run.

 
So it is a judgement call as to when the play is actually over? For instance, a player catches the ball in the end zone and goes to celebrate with a teammate in the endzone and when running to his teammate knocks the ball against his leg and drops it...incomplete pass?
Is he falling in the act of catching it? If so, he has to maintain control all the way through his fall. If his teammate knocked the ball out before he finishes his fall, then it's an incomplete pass.
 
God the Hou secondary is terrible. Crayton with 54 yards after the catch just stiff arming DB's left and right.

 
you gave foster a play off, it's 3rd and 2, bring him freaking back kubiak...if not then throw it cause they'll be playing the run...forget derrick ward

 
The Chargers gave up 135 rushing yards to the Chiefs in week one. That's the most they've given up so far this season.

The Texans have 135 rushing yards right now.

 
Philip Rivers could throw for 300 yards and multiple TDs with high school receivers.

Most underrated player in the NFL hands down.

 
The Chargers are now selling out to stop the run, and it's opening things up in the secondary.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hou goes for it on 4th and 1 on the 17th and Foster is brought down short. Huge play for the Chargers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rivers overthrew Crayton deap by about 4 yards. Had he hit Crayton that would have been a TD.

SD takes a delay of game on 3rd down.

 
So is hitting a quarterback low a freaking penalty or not? Because he clearly hit him low there, there's no question about it, and the ref was looking right at it.

So what's the deal with these weird roughing the passer penalties? Is it just if the ref feels like calling it or not?

 
So is hitting a quarterback low a freaking penalty or not? Because he clearly hit him low there, there's no question about it, and the ref was looking right at it.So what's the deal with these weird roughing the passer penalties? Is it just if the ref feels like calling it or not?
They'll catch it on video and fine him later in the week. That's the same thing, right?
 
Latest entry in the "Norv Turner Is An Idiot" sweepstakes; accepting an offsides penalty after a 9-yard gain, to make it first and 5 instead of second and one--and then running Tolbert into the line on first and 5.

 
I don't understand why that was a penalty. Ajirotutu was on the line. So what? You have to have at least seven on the line. It's okay to have more than seven. And since it was a running play, it shouldn't matter that the TE was made ineligible.

Must be an NFL thing. That wouldn't be a penalty in college.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Norv Turner is an offensive genius. BRILLIANT set up and play call on that TD.

ETA: MT quicker to the punch

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Norv Turner has coached called a brilliant offensive game (other than failing to use his timeouts at the end of the first half).
As we've seen, it's not difficult for your offense to look good against this defense, but I'll give Norv credit here.There's more to being a good head coach than just calling a good offense, and Norv's team still makes stupid penalties and doesn't look sqared away. The fact that they're having these special teams issues for this extended period of time is ridiculous. I can't think of another good coach who would have allowed it.

 
Norv Turner has coached called a brilliant offensive game (other than failing to use his timeouts at the end of the first half).
As we've seen, it's not difficult for your offense to look good against this defense, but I'll give Norv credit here.There's more to being a good head coach than just calling a good offense, and Norv's team still makes stupid penalties and doesn't look sqared away. The fact that they're having these special teams issues for this extended period of time is ridiculous. I can't think of another good coach who would have allowed it.
The special teams mistakes are the result of bad coaching during the week of practice, not bad coaching during the game.But I was just referring to the offensive playcalling.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top