NutterButter
Footballguy
We did it
What else are rich people going to do with their money?Man it's gonna suck when this house of cards comes down.
What should our retirement timeframe be before we start to move significant portions out of stocks, 5 years? I've got around 10 and I'm getting antsy to go to at least a 50 stock/50bond mix soon.Man it's gonna suck when this house of cards comes down.
I'm thinking 10 provided not in the middle of a big drop and then 120-age in stock from then on out.What should our retirement timeframe be before we start to move significant portions out of stocks, 5 years? I've got around 10 and I'm getting antsy to go to at least a 50 stock/50bond mix soon.
That's a little more stock heavy than I was thinking, but in the ballpark. This stupid run has to end sometime (hucks prediction nonewithstanding) and I don't want to be looking at Dow 12,000 with 80% of my portfolio in stock and I'm 55 years old or something. I'd rather risk the upside to have solid protection for the downside.I'm thinking 10 provided not in the middle of a big drop and then 120-age in stock from then on out.
If you're in that 10 year window, then it would be 65%.That's a little more stock heavy than I was thinking, but in the ballpark. This stupid run has to end sometime (hucks prediction nonewithstanding) and I don't want to be looking at Dow 12,000 with 80% of my portfolio in stock and I'm 55 years old or something. I'd rather risk the upside to have solid protection for the downside.
was?Let's please not get bogged down in details. The important thing to remember here is that LHUCKS was an idiot.
I'm not Evil Knievel man!If you're in that 10 year window, then it would be 65%.
Oh. If you plan on living long need to start off a little riskier. It will work itself out in the long term. Up, down, rebalance, repeat. My philosophy is be a little riskier, but give yourself some cushion with the retirement budgeting to be able to dial back a bit if necessary.65% in stocks seems kinda risky. Duh.![]()
Lhucks' real name is Levi.Isn't CSTU an Lhucks alias?
Let's just pretend they are.
I have the fortune of working with Fortune 100 strategists.This isn't a shooting from the hip kind of post.Thanks, Roubini.
65% in stocks sounds like you're being a huge () to me, but ymmv.65% in stocks seems kinda risky. Duh.![]()
I do 60% Broad Market, 20% Company Stock, 10% Treasuries, 10% Insurance Contracts in my 401k. Rebalance, repeat. Anti-LHUCKS'ian.Oh. If you plan on living long need to start off a little riskier. It will work itself out in the long term. Up, down, rebalance, repeat. My philosophy is be a little riskier, but give yourself some cushion with the retirement budgeting to be able to dial back a bit if necessary.
At first I was like65% in sounds like you're being a huge () to me, but ymmv.
i'm like 80% equities and the other 20% is bitcoin and sportsbets
then as I looked at it more I was thinking
followed by
What a bunch of bull ####.https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/5qhzcy/well_this_is_it_going_allin_my_last_stand_my/
Thought some of you might like this.
This guy done messed up.I hope for his sake it was just comedy
Edit: he livestreamed his reaction to the earnings call, must be fake.
looked real to me... pretty elaborate hoax and great acting if not legitimate.I hope for his sake it was just comedy
Edit: he livestreamed his reaction to the earnings call, must be fake.
It might actually be time to re-balance portfolios in light of the Big Cheeto sitting in the Oval Office. Maybe the OP, the premier ### hole of this board in his time and the equal of any of our Trumpites today, was just five years early.Dow 21,000
Up 61% since this thread was started
only up 65% - this is the LHUCKiest of LHUCKS threads ever. And that's saying something.Over the next four months several factors (including but not limited to Europe and the political mudslinging) are going to result in significant stock market losses IMHO. It may not happen, but I think the likelihood is much stronger than an increase.
The Dow is at 12,997 right now.![]()
You really ought to take a long look in the mirrorIt might actually be time to re-balance portfolios in light of the Big Cheeto sitting in the Oval Office. Maybe the OP, the premier ### hole of this board in his time and the equal of any of our Trumpites today, was just five years early.
Oh, wait. That still makes him an idiot.
It's definitely interesting. If people truly don't respect Trump and are concerned about him being president, the market shouldn't be performing so well.The Trump rally. Mother of all rallies. I'm talking bigly.
The market sees tax cuts coming and big spending. Great for the short term. Donnie is going to create the biggest bubble ever. Deficits don't matter x 1000.It's definitely interesting. If people truly don't respect Trump and are concerned about him being president, the market shouldn't be performing so well.
Exactly. My guess is the complainers are too poor to have $ in the markets.It's definitely interesting. If people truly don't respect Trump and are concerned about him being president, the market shouldn't be performing so well.
Nothing wrong with that as long as you pay attention and have a exit plan.The market sees tax cuts coming and big spending. Great for the short term. Donnie is going to create the biggest bubble ever. Deficits don't matter x 1000.
I wish we could have Barabbas for just 24 hours so LHUCKS could have an opportunity to post in here.Always happy to see this thread bumped -- it lets me know that we're approaching another record close.
you might want to read the first post in the thread again. This is the key lineNREC34 said:Well, he was right.
I'm guessing this was poor advice.Inverse Index ETFs are the sharkmove here. 3X leverage if you believe as strongly as I do.
![]()
this thread.
Well, you got this part right.Nice to have a few bears on board...welcome to the best thread in this forum.![]()