What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Go Get These Guys" (1 Viewer)

Foster is looking stout tonight.Slaton will not break through if Foster plays like this all year.There I am not blind. But...if a door opens for Slaton....look out.
Spiller has looked really good as of late as well. Really glad I grabbed him in my redrafts as a "need" pick. With the opportunity he has week 1, he my never look back and perform as a nice RB1 even. Good things happen for him.
Spiller = world class blue chip talent.
 
I'd add Caddy to the list of undervalued. He will be the centerpiece of TB's offense this year and should significantly outperform has ADP.

Remember when Frank Gore was the newly-designated starter for SF but went low b/c of his prior injuries? That's Caddy this year, although I can't say Caddy's hands are as good as Gore's.

 
I think a lot of people are losing sight of the big picture on Jerome Harrison.

CLE offense had nearly 500 carries 2,100 yds and #8 rushing rank in tough AFC North

O-Line consistently rated "A" by many OL gurus for run blocking

HArrison is clearly lead back and, even if Hillis take 40% of last year's total, that's still 1200 yds

TD expectations should probably modest

Hopefully an upgrade at QB but certainly can't do worse

ADP of RB33

He's not gonna be Chris Johnson but chances are good for a solid RB2 performance at RB3/4 pricing
Well, heck, isn't that what it's all about?

Who needs "domination" from a RB2?

Get an occasional 100 yard game and 1000+ yards from a very, very late round or cheapo ($1-4) auction pick? A great RB1 paired with a RB like the above will take you a long way.

The Browns offense should actually improve with Delhomme in there, but the WR's will never, ever turn them into a passing offense, why not expect more of the same?

 
Harrison's domination comes from his production (pts) vs cost (or, more specifically, opportunity cost). The team that had him probably had major problems at RB2 - and probably was better than average at QB/WR/TE - so they plugged him in and let it fly. If you were not in a deep league and he got plucked off the waiver wire by a playoff team desperate for a 2nd back, they probably steam rolled the playoffs.

Last I checked, most leagues did not penalize for number of carries. Yes, that impacts his consideration going into 2010, but to cast aside what he did last year is foolhardy. The key is identifying the same player going into THIS year's playoffs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Harrison's domination comes from his production (pts) vs cost (or, more specifically, opportunity cost). The team that had him probably had major problems at RB2 - and probably was better than average at QB/WR/TE - so they plugged him in and let it fly. If you were not in a deep league and he got plucked off the waiver wire by a playoff team desperate for a 2nd back, they probably steam rolled the playoffs.

Last I checked, most leagues did not penalize for number of carries. Yes, that impacts his consideration going into 2010, but to cast aside what he did last year is foolhardy. The key is identifying the same player going into THIS year's playoffs.
Look, you don't have to tell me that his FANTASY domination came from a high workload...that's the argument I made last year http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...Jerome+Harrison and have continued to make this year.

The problem with that is, he didn't dominate in NFL terms. Which means he's at a high risk of his NFL team no longer giving him 40 touches a game.

Hell, Adrian Peterson is at a high risk of not getting 40 touches per game...then again, he can do what Harrison did on 25 touches. That's why he remains the lead back in MIN, while CLE drafted a replacement.

 
I would challenge anybody who thinks jerome harrison is in any way remotely dominant, if they are true tothese beliefs and not bull####ting and fishing, to put 'JEROME HARRISON DOMINATES THE NFL!!!' in their sig, and leave it there all season.

if you want to cut a deal, I am willing to put 'JEROME HARRISON SUX!!!' in my sig.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
the thing with jerome harrison you have to consider is not the likelihood that he will end the season as a top 10 back. its the likelihood that you can plug him in during the weeks where he has a good matchup and know theres a very good chance he will put up a nice week. you also know hes going to get touches and thus at least a few points when you desperately need to plug in an rb in due to bye weeks etc. at his adp you certainly aren't expecting to get an every week starter.
why not? I mean, if Hardesty cuts into his carries or gets goalline carries, then I would agree with you.But if not, I'd start Harrison week 1 and feel completely confident. Some good talent on that Oline, and if anything, Delhomme can hopefully be an upgrade over what they had last year in the passing game, though I personally think Seneca Wallace will be starting at some point.
Hillis is going to get plenty of touches as well and probably will be the GL back.
 
I would challenge anybody who thinks jerome harrison is in any way remotely dominant, if they are true tothese beliefs and not bull####ting and fishing, to put 'JEROME HARRISON DOMINATES THE NFL!!!' in their sig, and leave it there all season.if you want to cut a deal, I am willing to put 'JEROME HARRISON SUX!!!' in my sig.
Why would "Jerome Harrison dominates the NFL" be even remotely equivalent to saying he was dominant at the end of last season?
 
He wasn't dominant. He barely performed better than LaDainian Tomlinson. Everybody said LT was washed up and terrible, no? That's the same rate at which JH rushed...only difference is that LT didn't get 35 carries a game.

 
the thing with jerome harrison you have to consider is not the likelihood that he will end the season as a top 10 back. its the likelihood that you can plug him in during the weeks where he has a good matchup and know theres a very good chance he will put up a nice week. you also know hes going to get touches and thus at least a few points when you desperately need to plug in an rb in due to bye weeks etc. at his adp you certainly aren't expecting to get an every week starter.
why not? I mean, if Hardesty cuts into his carries or gets goalline carries, then I would agree with you.But if not, I'd start Harrison week 1 and feel completely confident. Some good talent on that Oline, and if anything, Delhomme can hopefully be an upgrade over what they had last year in the passing game, though I personally think Seneca Wallace will be starting at some point.
Hillis is going to get plenty of touches as well and probably will be the GL back.
I would say occasionally he would and he would get catches as well. I don't see a consistent GL back there. I think by week 8 barring injurt Hardesty will be the man. Reports at OTA's on how well he picked up the offense should result in his starting sooner rather than later.
Todem said:
Foster is looking stout tonight.Slaton will not break through if Foster plays like this all year.There I am not blind. But...if a door opens for Slaton....look out.
Look out or you'll get hit by the fumble? :lmao: So far Foster looks like this years Ray Rice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look, you don't have to tell me that his FANTASY domination came from a high workload...that's the argument I made last year http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...Jerome+Harrison and have continued to make this year.
He wasn't dominant.
:wall: :goodposting:
You either don't read, or you're fishing, in which case, great job, I'm hook line and sinker.

He had a dominant FANTASY line. He was absolutely NOT dominant in his role of an NFL RB. He was mediocre. Below average. Easily replaced. Incredibly lucky.

When a player does that, he gets replaced...as evidenced by the drafting of a rookie RB relatively high. You seem to be blinded by the fact that fantasy production can only come from continued NFL production, and if a guy has poor NFL production, then his fantasy line goes away too.

 
the thing with jerome harrison you have to consider is not the likelihood that he will end the season as a top 10 back. its the likelihood that you can plug him in during the weeks where he has a good matchup and know theres a very good chance he will put up a nice week. you also know hes going to get touches and thus at least a few points when you desperately need to plug in an rb in due to bye weeks etc. at his adp you certainly aren't expecting to get an every week starter.
why not? I mean, if Hardesty cuts into his carries or gets goalline carries, then I would agree with you.But if not, I'd start Harrison week 1 and feel completely confident. Some good talent on that Oline, and if anything, Delhomme can hopefully be an upgrade over what they had last year in the passing game, though I personally think Seneca Wallace will be starting at some point.
Hillis is going to get plenty of touches as well and probably will be the GL back.
I would say occasionally he would and he would get catches as well. I don't see a consistent GL back there. I think by week 8 barring injurt Hardesty will be the man. Reports at OTA's on how well he picked up the offense should result in his starting sooner rather than later.
Todem said:
Foster is looking stout tonight.Slaton will not break through if Foster plays like this all year.There I am not blind. But...if a door opens for Slaton....look out.
Look out or you'll get hit by the fumble? :goodposting: So far Foster looks like this years Ray Rice.
Bada boom. (cymbal crash)Ok somebody....quick book this guy on Leno. :wall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You seem to be blinded by the fact that fantasy production can only come from continued NFL production, and if a guy has poor NFL production, then his fantasy line goes away too.
What in God's name does this have to do with whether or not he was dominant at the end of last season? :goodposting:
 
Back to topic.

I grabbed a few guys we have been talking about about. I went for the fences in my only redraft league. 12 teamer PPR scoring 6 points all td's as well as bonus points for td's over 40 and over 60 yards.

A.Foster 4.6

Jahvid Best 5.5

Kevin Kolb 6.6

Ahmad Bradshaw 7.5

Should be fun.

And oh yes I handcuffed Slaton (turf toe injury was mild from what I heard and I have seen RB's play with that for years).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How did this weekend affect my thoughts?

Arian Foster seems like he was a good choice, and I still like him to be a top ten RB if he stays healthy. His value probably shot through the roof though, and I can't imagine that in drafts that occur from now to week 1, that his ADP will remain where it was last week.

If you were one of the fortunate owners that has alreay snagged him on the cheap, you will be rewarded.

I never try to make too much out of pre-season, but Peyton Hillis does scare me a little for Jerome Harrison owners.

Don't get me wrong, Harrison could still do it, but now you're throwing another guy in the hat for touches, and Hillis is such a hard-hitter that he might snag 5-7 TD's this year on the goalline.

Of course I did say that Harrison is "unlikely" to attain top ten status, and it is a little ridiculous that the thread has derailed because some Hardesty owners decided to hijack it.

Anyway, let's try and stay on topic here. No one in this thread anointed Harrison the next Jim Brown.

 
How did this weekend affect my thoughts?Arian Foster seems like he was a good choice, and I still like him to be a top ten RB if he stays healthy. His value probably shot through the roof though, and I can't imagine that in drafts that occur from now to week 1, that his ADP will remain where it was last week. If you were one of the fortunate owners that has alreay snagged him on the cheap, you will be rewarded.I never try to make too much out of pre-season, but Peyton Hillis does scare me a little for Jerome Harrison owners.Don't get me wrong, Harrison could still do it, but now you're throwing another guy in the hat for touches, and Hillis is such a hard-hitter that he might snag 5-7 TD's this year on the goalline.Of course I did say that Harrison is "unlikely" to attain top ten status, and it is a little ridiculous that the thread has derailed because some Hardesty owners decided to hijack it. Anyway, let's try and stay on topic here. No one in this thread anointed Harrison the next Jim Brown.
Yes...the Browns RB situtation is so murky. Hillis is getting touches, Harrison is in the mix and when Hardesty is healthy they for sure will get him involved. I decided to just stay away from that quigmire (sp?).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
whys this so hard for you to understand. those numbers werent a function of him performing well or even averagely. they were simply a function of how many carries he had. and its quite certainly not something that will ever happen again.
You're right, he wasn't even average in those games. :rolleyes: Guys, peddle this junk somewhere else.
Dude, he wasn't average. Actually, what is the NFL ypc average? Right around 4? 3.7<4.......so I would say not even average.

He sucked. He burned 39 downs against Oakland and only got 130 or so yards for it. That's awful production. If a receiver has 39 catches for 130 yards, is that a dominating performance? No.

The guy that has 5 catches for 130 yards is more dominating in a massive way...he got the same amount of yardage and used up 34 less offensive plays. He was an incredible asset...just like 130 yards of of 15 carries is WAY more impressive (or should I say "actually" impressive) when compared to 39 carries for 130 yards.

39 carries should damn well be an NFL record if we want to call it dominating. And this is coming from the guy who told you all it would happen a week or two before it did...
I'm gonna disagree with you here. That kind of performance is beyond dominating! Everyone seems to be holding the large number of carries against Harrison. I would argue the opposite. Any time a running back gets close to 40 carries in a game, you have to tip your hat to the guy. Not a huge fan of Harrison, but don't get why a large number of carries would be considered a negative. He obviously moved the chains.
 
How did this weekend affect my thoughts?Arian Foster seems like he was a good choice, and I still like him to be a top ten RB if he stays healthy. His value probably shot through the roof though, and I can't imagine that in drafts that occur from now to week 1, that his ADP will remain where it was last week. If you were one of the fortunate owners that has alreay snagged him on the cheap, you will be rewarded.I never try to make too much out of pre-season, but Peyton Hillis does scare me a little for Jerome Harrison owners.Don't get me wrong, Harrison could still do it, but now you're throwing another guy in the hat for touches, and Hillis is such a hard-hitter that he might snag 5-7 TD's this year on the goalline.Of course I did say that Harrison is "unlikely" to attain top ten status, and it is a little ridiculous that the thread has derailed because some Hardesty owners decided to hijack it. Anyway, let's try and stay on topic here. No one in this thread anointed Harrison the next Jim Brown.
Yes...the Browns RB situtation is so murky. Hillis is getting touches, Harrison is in the mix and when Hardesty is healthy they for sure will get him involved. I decided to just stay away from that quigmire (sp?).
Harrison is still my pick, as he has produced every time he has been given the opportunity. But I'm just not as confident as I was last week due to worries about Hillis.
 
How did this weekend affect my thoughts?

Arian Foster seems like he was a good choice, and I still like him to be a top ten RB if he stays healthy. His value probably shot through the roof though, and I can't imagine that in drafts that occur from now to week 1, that his ADP will remain where it was last week.

I never try to make too much out of pre-season, but Peyton Hillis does scare me a little for Jerome Harrison owners.

Don't get me wrong, Harrison could still do it, but now you're throwing another guy in the hat for touches, and Hillis is such a hard-hitter that he might snag 5-7 TD's this year on the goalline.

Of course I did say that Harrison is "unlikely" to attain top ten status, and it is a little ridiculous that the thread has derailed because some Hardesty owners decided to hijack it.

Anyway, let's try and stay on topic here. No one in this thread anointed Harrison the next Jim Brown.
:lmao: I can't speak for Larry, but I don't own Hardesty, and I think it hurts you to make that assumption. Nobody is derailing the thread, a point was made that Harrison's NFL performance was poor, which is not a good sign for him to get more touches this year, which would make him a poor selection. I think the argument was simply that he didn't have a place on the list, and it actually seemed to generate quite a bit of discussion...which I thought was what the forum existed for...

Foster does look good, but I'm also picking up Jeremiah Johnson. If Foster has any fumbling issues, Johnson is a powerful back in the MJD body type who could definitely have an impact this year.

 
I think those that love Foster and are totally dismissing Slaton in the HOU offense are mistaken.
Very :goodposting: Slaton is my biggest value special at RB this year.1) Slaton2) Ahmad Bradshaw3) LT4) McGahee (TD's lot's of TD's)5) Ronnie Brown (plays 16 top 10 back)
I only have 15 spots and I don't want to take the 20% chance on some of these guys. I agree with Bradshaw and maybe LT, but he is getting expensive with his involvement in the preseason. I think you would have to take all 3 Slaton, McGahee and LT to land the one guy. Meanwhile you're not picking up the Miles Austins, and Hakeem Nicks' and you're stuck with hoping Lee Evans finally reaches his potential. Don't hold you breath on that last one.I like I guy like Foster, Barber, Bradshaw. A mid rounder who could drop into the flex based on his floor or could sit top ten easily.
 
I realize this has been extensively discussed, but I am still not sure I get this point:

--- why does a RB who closed out 2009 extremely, extremely strong on the league's #8 rushing offense getting better QB'ing get little or no enthusiasm (Harrison)?

--- while a RB who closed out 2009 very, very strong (but not as strong as Harrison) on the league's #30 rushing offense which has the same QB and which is devoted to the pass to the extreme gets tons and tons of enthusiasm (Foster)?

Also: Harrison's coach stuck with his starter til the end of his rope; Foster's coach yanked his RB's when they fumbled. Foster was behind Ryan Moats; while Harrison was behind longtime stalwart Jamal Lewis.

Foster could have been the all time runner at Tennessee, but then again he could never take the job away from Hardesty who is unable to wrest the job from..... Harrison.

Caveat: I watched Harrison end of last year on tv; I saw Foster live in the Dome vs the Saints this preseason, but that's it. Clearly there have been lots of live reports and I see all the excitement, but then there is the above.

 
the dominator: 16 carries for 33 yds, 3 catches for 35
Yes, the Harrison pick didn't turn out, Kool-aid Larry.But the Foster and McFadden picks aren't looking too bad, nor is the Addai pick. I wasn't trying to pick the top ten. Just to pick guys with low adp's that could potentially make the top ten.
 
the dominator: 16 carries for 33 yds, 3 catches for 35
Yes, the Harrison pick didn't turn out, Kool-aid Larry.But the Foster and McFadden picks aren't looking too bad, nor is the Addai pick. I wasn't trying to pick the top ten. Just to pick guys with low adp's that could potentially make the top ten.
I do say good job on Foster, but a tinge of "everyone on the board basically said the same thing" has to be mixed in. :bag:McFadden is one I disagreed with, so nice one there.Addai is always undervalued since the one season he was injured and a 1st rounder. The fantasy world holds a grudge.
 
the dominator: 16 carries for 33 yds, 3 catches for 35
Yes, the Harrison pick didn't turn out, Kool-aid Larry.But the Foster and McFadden picks aren't looking too bad, nor is the Addai pick. I wasn't trying to pick the top ten. Just to pick guys with low adp's that could potentially make the top ten.
I do say good job on Foster, but a tinge of "everyone on the board basically said the same thing" has to be mixed in. :popcorn:McFadden is one I disagreed with, so nice one there.Addai is always undervalued since the one season he was injured and a 1st rounder. The fantasy world holds a grudge.
I don't think Arian Foster got much love at all until he exploded during that pre-season game. Sure, he had his supporters, but at the time of this post, his ADP was still in the 20's.
 
I don't think Arian Foster got much love at all until he exploded during that pre-season game. Sure, he had his supporters, but at the time of this post, his ADP was still in the 20's.
While there were some people who were high on Foster early, the Tate injury and the relegation of Slaton to return duties in the preseason drew a lot more attention to Foster. His ADP shot up over 10 rounds from end of July to end of August.(Cite: http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/adp.php )

By late August, he was number 1 with a bullet on nearly every sleeper list.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really good read and lots of good points.Re: Addai, I think people overlook his blocking ability and that continues to give him a major advantage over Brown. He catches also and, so, I really like his chances this year to be a great FF player.I'm with you on Portis. for one year; this year...Yeah, run his legs off and he probably ends up top 12 or so. Welcome addition on any team I have where he doesn't have to shoulder the load. Nothing but upside on this one compared to where you get him or pay for him. I LIKED ALOT what I saw of Leon in the game last week. Never been a Leon fan and its pre-season but he clearly looked better than the other guys.Foster..Man. People are going to be so surprised. Someone said not to overlook Slaton but its opposite: Its time to let go of Slaton (hate to say it cause i have him on one league) but he's headed towards obscurity. He was a nice play in a year where he overachieved on a team that craved a big back but they all got hurt: so, they made the best of it but even when he was drafted they said they saw him as too little to do the things they wanted to do. Well now they're not beggars, they are choosers and Slaton is the fill in guy.
Addai has kinda become that guy you don't want to have but when you get to about week 8 you realize he is a consistent performer. He is also the type of player that teams try to find newer/better replacements and continue to just go back to him (IE: Packers with Ryan Grant, Thomas Jones wherever he has been, etc...)Addai has yet to shake the stigma of being a first round fantasy football bust 2 years ago (at least I think it was 2.) Matt Forte will most likely follow this path as well.
 
I realize this has been extensively discussed, but I am still not sure I get this point:--- why does a RB who closed out 2009 extremely, extremely strong on the league's #8 rushing offense getting better QB'ing get little or no enthusiasm (Harrison)?--- while a RB who closed out 2009 very, very strong (but not as strong as Harrison) on the league's #30 rushing offense which has the same QB and which is devoted to the pass to the extreme gets tons and tons of enthusiasm (Foster)?Also: Harrison's coach stuck with his starter til the end of his rope; Foster's coach yanked his RB's when they fumbled. Foster was behind Ryan Moats; while Harrison was behind longtime stalwart Jamal Lewis.Foster could have been the all time runner at Tennessee, but then again he could never take the job away from Hardesty who is unable to wrest the job from..... Harrison.Caveat: I watched Harrison end of last year on tv; I saw Foster live in the Dome vs the Saints this preseason, but that's it. Clearly there have been lots of live reports and I see all the excitement, but then there is the above.
are you getting it now?
 
i dunno, browns have a great oline and if harrison was indeed getting the bellcow carries he would be putting up fine numbers. i would hold your opinion in much higher esteem if you had predicted hillis to succeed. most ppl didnt, thats why he was a huge waiver pickup until week 3 in a lot of leagues.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i dunno, browns have a great oline and if harrison was indeed getting the bellcow carries he would be putting up fine numbers. i would hold your opinion in much higher esteem if you had predicted hillis to succeed. most ppl didnt, thats why he was a huge waiver pickup until week 3 in a lot of leagues.
I think we mentioned a couple times that Hillis was the guy to own in CLE...And the exact point we made again and again was that Harrison is only good with an exorbitant amount of carries. That would seem to hold true thus far.
 
i dunno, browns have a great oline and if harrison was indeed getting the bellcow carries he would be putting up fine numbers. i would hold your opinion in much higher esteem if you had predicted hillis to succeed. most ppl didnt, thats why he was a huge waiver pickup until week 3 in a lot of leagues.
I think we mentioned a couple times that Hillis was the guy to own in CLE...And the exact point we made again and again was that Harrison is only good with an exorbitant amount of carries. That would seem to hold true thus far.
I made sure I picked him up in as many leagues as I could and even drafted him in the 3rd round (rookie/freeagent draft) of my big $$$ local dynasty league.He has really helped as a RB 3 performing at RB2 level.Great call on that one!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i dunno, browns have a great oline and if harrison was indeed getting the bellcow carries he would be putting up fine numbers. i would hold your opinion in much higher esteem if you had predicted hillis to succeed. most ppl didnt, thats why he was a huge waiver pickup until week 3 in a lot of leagues.
funny how every guy who wanders in off the street for directions, or whatever, ends up taking harrison's job.
 
Ok, out of 6 players that had ADP's over 20 (among rb's only), I nailed 2 top 5 guys. Not bad.

I also had some HUGE misses, but that's going to happen when you are picking guys that others don't like.

What can we learn from this?

Every season, there are studs that come in the middle rounds. ESPECIALLY in deep roster-drafts, I think I am going to really focus on trading out of the top picks and acquiring as many mid-level draft picks as I possibly can.

Imagine I had taken the above list and tried to get all 6 of these guys. Probably could have done it relatively easy. PLUS I could have gotten Rodgers/Manning/Rivers and a stud WR as well.

Rodgers

Andre Johnson

Foster

Mcfadden

Championship in all formats most likely.

And that's not counting potential waiver wire gems like Hillis, Torain and many others that astute owners might have racked up.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top