rockaction
Footballguy
Okay, that'll explain it. Thanks. And they were that bad, I guess.http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2014/03/rick_reilly_retires_why_the_espn_columnist_couldn_t_survive_in_the_era_of.htmlI only follow this cursorily, but that couldn't have been a great move. I can't even find Reilly articles on their web site (maybe they wind up in the magazine?), and when I read them, they're absolute rubbish.Sports Illustrated is also Time Warner, but I agree that other Warner properties like TNT, B/R, and HBO are better fits for the Simmons brand. Especially given how Simmons lost his #### when ESPN showed up at SI flagship brand Rick Reilly's house with a dump truck full of money.I'll be surprised if it's Fox. Just doesn't seem like the right fit to me in terms of personalities.Capella said:Fox sports does make sense. I forgot they have that awful cable network now.
The whole Time Warner conglomerate of networks seems more likely to me (they also own bleacherreport.com and run the nba.com site). You could certainly see him doing NBA on TNT/NBA TV, doing 30 for 30 type docs on CNN or HBO, writing on NBA.com, doing podcasts under the CNN umbrella, etc. (or just starting his own website with their backing).