Great teams don't miss the Super Bowl, that is what makes them great.Spinoff of Chase's Thread.I submit the 1998 Vikings as #1but I'd like to hear about any others that were big time and suffered a bad beat or fluke upset in the prior rounds.1996 Denver also is in the discussion
worst response EVERGreat teams don't miss the Super Bowl, that is what makes them great.
who did they lose to in the playoffs, what happened? Giants?'86 Bears14-2 regular season. Actually gave us less points over the 16 game season than the '85 team.
Shocking grammar. Shockingthey were bad beated in the earlier rounds
I'm NOT a Patriots fan. I'm a fan of the best team winning.I ABHOR the Patriots 2001 team - that Super Bowl infuriated me more than any one until last season's.and although not born at the time, i'm still pretty hacked about '68 tooAs this is a Dentist thread, the correct answers are (not necessarily in order)...2006 Patriots2005 Patriots2008 Patriots2002 Patriotsalthough you could make a case for the 1997 Patriots
yeah, that's making my head hurt.Shocking grammar. Shockingthey were bad beated in the earlier rounds
Jay Schroeder shredded Chicago's average CBs. Jeff Jacoby had one arm in a cast and used it to club Richard Dent into submission. Flutie threw a couple of picks and Payton fumbled late to quell any possible comeback.Edit: The Giants fans were dying for Chicago to come to the Meadowlands for the NFCCG as Chicago had drilled them 21-0 in the playoffs the year prior. After demolishing SF in the divisional round, the NY fans chanted "We want the Bears". Unfortunately, Chicago laid an egg vs. Washington and denied the nation a 14-2 vs. 14-2 matchup with the defending champion to boot.who did they lose to in the playoffs, what happened? Giants?'86 Bears
14-2 regular season. Actually gave us less points over the 16 game season than the '85 team.
DEFINITELY.. I can't believe I forgot about that Dolphins team.. that was a gross beat and denied us of a great super bowl.a Bears vs. Dolphins re-match wouldn't have been as disgusting.Easily one of the top super bowls we missed out on as a nation.. right up there with '98 vikings vs. BroncosI think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
That Dolphins team was fatally flawed by its horrendous run defense. Cleveland gave them a scare in the divisional round by running all over them and the Pats ran for over 250yds in the AFCCG with no long gainers to skew the total. Chicago would have learned from its MNF matchup and probably dispatched Miami with ease, although not as much ease as they did vs. Tony "The Turtle" Eason's Pats.DEFINITELY.. I can't believe I forgot about that Dolphins team.. that was a gross beat and denied us of a great super bowl.a Bears vs. Dolphins re-match wouldn't have been as disgusting.Easily one of the top super bowls we missed out on as a nation.. right up there with '98 vikings vs. BroncosI think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
I think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
'94 Cowboys: definitely. Even Sports Illustrated had billed their game vs. SF as "The Real Super Bowl" on the cover the week prior. They got down 21-0 five minutes into that NFCCG and still made a game of it. If they didn't have such a lousy start, that outcome could have been very different.I think the '92 49ers were probably the best of their '90s teams that fell short. They were 14-2, had MVP Steve Young and were pissed as hell at missing out of the playoffs the year prior. They just ran into a Cowboys defense that could keep them in check...and couldn't stop Alvin Harper to save their lives. Harper was a 49ers assassin and he, not Michael Irvin, was the main reason the 49ers fetched Deion Sanders in '94.I'm thinking there are some 49ers teams - maybe '93 or '95 that were just damn good but ran into the Cowboys, but still would've won the super bowl easily.
and for that matter the '94 cowboys would also likely have won the super bowl if not for the niners.
I'm sure there have been a lot more conference championship games that were really the super bowl in disguise that had some great teams.
gotta love the gramma police... 96 Broncos.Shocking grammar. Shockingthey were bad beated in the earlier rounds
87 49ers is my pick. Dominated the regular season but got upset by the Vikes'94 Cowboys: definitely. Even Sports Illustrated had billed their game vs. SF as "The Real Super Bowl" on the cover the week prior. They got down 21-0 five minutes into that NFCCG and still made a game of it. If they didn't have such a lousy start, that outcome could have been very different.I think the '92 49ers were probably the best of their '90s teams that fell short. They were 14-2, had MVP Steve Young and were pissed as hell at missing out of the playoffs the year prior. They just ran into a Cowboys defense that could keep them in check...and couldn't stop Alvin Harper to save their lives. Harper was a 49ers assassin and he, not Michael Irvin, was the main reason the 49ers fetched Deion Sanders in '94.I'm thinking there are some 49ers teams - maybe '93 or '95 that were just damn good but ran into the Cowboys, but still would've won the super bowl easily.
and for that matter the '94 cowboys would also likely have won the super bowl if not for the niners.
I'm sure there have been a lot more conference championship games that were really the super bowl in disguise that had some great teams.
Edit: Forgot to give some love to the '90 49ers team going for the 3-peat. If Roger Craig doesn't fumble late in the NFCCG, the 49ers were more than likely playing the Bills, although it's questionable how they would have done if Montana was either woozy or couldn't play.
The 94 Cowboys would have won the Super Bowl if Jerry Jones wasn't such an ###. That decision could have easily been the reason why we may never ever see a team win 3 or in that case 4 straight Super Bowls. Those Cowboys had an amazing collection of talent and coaching.The funny thing is that the transition from Jimmy Johnson to Switzer, who still won a SB because of Johnson's team, is a textbook example of a good college coach making a successful transition to the NFL and a good college coach making a not so good transition. I know, I know Switzer won a SB, but I was a huge fan of the Cowboys back then and Switzer got lucky to inherit a two time SB winner that was in its prime.I'm thinking there are some 49ers teams - maybe '93 or '95 that were just damn good but ran into the Cowboys, but still would've won the super bowl easily.
and for that matter the '94 cowboys would also likely have won the super bowl if not for the niners.
I'm sure there have been a lot more conference championship games that were really the super bowl in disguise that had some great teams.
Thank god the Dolphins lost though. Had they advanced to the Super Bowl and defeated Chicago, you, me, and Boomer Esiason wouldn't have Dan Marino to kick around.I think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
I don't think the Dolphins would've beaten Chicago a 2nd time that season.That being said, if they had I think there would be little argument he was a top 2-3 QB everThank god the Dolphins lost though. Had they advanced to the Super Bowl and defeated Chicago, you, me, and Boomer Esiason wouldn't have Dan Marino to kick around.I think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
The Vikings were the worst team to make the playoffs in the nfc, but they were on fire their first 2 games in huge upsets at NO and SF. IIRC, Anthony Carter had a ridiculous game against SF and somehow the Vikings managed to hold Rice to like 2 catches for 20 yards. This allowed Washington to host Minny in the NFCCG.87 49ers is my pick. Dominated the regular season but got upset by the Vikes'94 Cowboys: definitely. Even Sports Illustrated had billed their game vs. SF as "The Real Super Bowl" on the cover the week prior. They got down 21-0 five minutes into that NFCCG and still made a game of it. If they didn't have such a lousy start, that outcome could have been very different.I think the '92 49ers were probably the best of their '90s teams that fell short. They were 14-2, had MVP Steve Young and were pissed as hell at missing out of the playoffs the year prior. They just ran into a Cowboys defense that could keep them in check...and couldn't stop Alvin Harper to save their lives. Harper was a 49ers assassin and he, not Michael Irvin, was the main reason the 49ers fetched Deion Sanders in '94.I'm thinking there are some 49ers teams - maybe '93 or '95 that were just damn good but ran into the Cowboys, but still would've won the super bowl easily.
and for that matter the '94 cowboys would also likely have won the super bowl if not for the niners.
I'm sure there have been a lot more conference championship games that were really the super bowl in disguise that had some great teams.
Edit: Forgot to give some love to the '90 49ers team going for the 3-peat. If Roger Craig doesn't fumble late in the NFCCG, the 49ers were more than likely playing the Bills, although it's questionable how they would have done if Montana was either woozy or couldn't play.
#1 in offense and defense and point differential. 13-2 regular season. The single most dominant season ever by a WR (imo), Jerry Rice's 23 TDs in 12 games.
One of the all-time great defensive performances.For a serious reply... most in the Steeler organization consider the 1976 team to be their greatest, at least on defense, but they did not win the championship.1976 Steelers were only 10-4, but started 1-4 and lost Bradshaw. They won their final nine games just to make the playoffs, by a cumulative 234-28. Defense held eight of the nine teams without TDs, including five shutouts. Annihilated the Colts in Baltimore 40-14 and gained 524 yards in the game. However, both Franco Harris and Rocky Bleier were lost to injuries.Oakland defeated the Steelers in the AFC championship 24-7. Give the Raiders credit, as they were 16-1 that season and they beat the Steelers again to kick off the 1977 season. At the very least, this was the Super Bowl in the conference championship scenario, arguably for the fifth consecutive season in the AFCC.
15 game win streak (Started 1-1)Beat the Patriots by 14 and the Eagles by 24. The games weren't even close. But Ben tailed off down the stretch and the Patriots were the class of the league that season.2004 Steelers/Rothlisberger's 1st season. They went 15-1 reg. season (w/ 16 game win streak including a playoff win) and beat both the Pats (Superbowl champs) and Eagles (Superbowl loser) during the middle of the regular season. Steelers just peaked at the wrong time (similiar to Giants/Titans this year), and got in a funk late in the season....barely squeaked by the Jets in divisional round then got handled fairly easily by the Pats in the championship game.
That was the 1st team I though of. They also missed John Stallworth for most of that season and Swann missed some time too.I might be slightly biased as I believe those 70's Steelers teams were by far the best in NFL history.For a serious reply... most in the Steeler organization consider the 1976 team to be their greatest, at least on defense, but they did not win the championship.1976 Steelers were only 10-4, but started 1-4 and lost Bradshaw. They won their final nine games just to make the playoffs, by a cumulative 234-28. Defense held eight of the nine teams without TDs, including five shutouts. Annihilated the Colts in Baltimore 40-14 and gained 524 yards in the game. However, both Franco Harris and Rocky Bleier were lost to injuries.Oakland defeated the Steelers in the AFC championship 24-7. Give the Raiders credit, as they were 16-1 that season and they beat the Steelers again to kick off the 1977 season. At the very least, this was the Super Bowl in the conference championship scenario, arguably for the fifth consecutive season in the AFCC.The Raiders will argue that their 1974 team is worthy of this discussion. 12-2 regular season with the two losses by a combined four points. Defeat two-time defending champion Dolphins in the "Sea of Hands" game. Lead the Steelers 10-3 entering the fourth quarter of the AFCC at home.
To be honest i'm surprised you didn't kill yourself during the 2006 March Madness.I'm NOT a Patriots fan. I'm a fan of the best team winning.I ABHOR the Patriots 2001 team - that Super Bowl infuriated me more than any one until last season's.and although not born at the time, i'm still pretty hacked about '68 tooAs this is a Dentist thread, the correct answers are (not necessarily in order)...2006 Patriots2005 Patriots2008 Patriots2002 Patriotsalthough you could make a case for the 1997 Patriots
The 1994 Chiefs hosted the 49ers in the home opener, but the team that defeated the streaking Oilers and lost at Buffalo in the AFCC was the 1993 Chiefs.1994 KC Chiefs. Add Joe Montana and Marcus Allen to an already prolific D! The Chiefs replaced Arrowhead's astroturf with natural grass for big Joe "he needs no knickname" Montana. How is that for clout?!? In the home opener, Montana's KC Chiefs defeats Steve Young's SF 49rs. Oh the drama! They get all the way to the AFC divisional championship, defeating the heavily favored Oilers, who were on an 11 game win streak...Only to be bested by the Bills who claim their 4th in a row AFC Title. The Bills of course go on to lose the SB for the 4th time in a row. Daaaaaaaaaaang!
That Colts team didn't lose a meaningful game all year until this crazy ending that featured 1) One of the slowest QB's in the league making an open field game-saving tackle and 2) the most accurate kicker in NFL history shanking a potential game-tying FG 20 yards to the right.2005 Indianapolis ColtsIf Nick Harper's wife doesn't stab him the night before their divisional playoff game the Colts would have won the Super Bowl.
I disagree. Miami's team was built to beat the bears. Stephenson at center and Marino's release negated the Bear pass rush, so the 46 was not as effective.I don't think the Dolphins would've beaten Chicago a 2nd time that season.That being said, if they had I think there would be little argument he was a top 2-3 QB everThank god the Dolphins lost though. Had they advanced to the Super Bowl and defeated Chicago, you, me, and Boomer Esiason wouldn't have Dan Marino to kick around.I think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
http://www.kcchiefs.com/history/90s/The 1994 Chiefs hosted the 49ers in the home opener, but the team that defeated the streaking Oilers and lost at Buffalo in the AFCC was the 1993 Chiefs.1994 KC Chiefs. Add Joe Montana and Marcus Allen to an already prolific D! The Chiefs replaced Arrowhead's astroturf with natural grass for big Joe "he needs no knickname" Montana. How is that for clout?!?
In the home opener, Montana's KC Chiefs defeats Steve Young's SF 49rs. Oh the drama! They get all the way to the AFC divisional championship, defeating the heavily favored Oilers, who were on an 11 game win streak...Only to be bested by the Bills who claim their 4th in a row AFC Title. The Bills of course go on to lose the SB for the 4th time in a row.
Daaaaaaaaaaang!
Dude, the playoffs occurred in 1994, but it is almost universally accepted to refer to the regular season when identifying the team. In other words, when referring to the past three Super Bowl champions, it is the 2005 Steelers, 2006 Colts and 2007 Giants. This year's champion will be the 2008 Steelers or the 2008 Cardinals (not 2009). You can also refer to a team as the 1993-94 Chiefs, which shows both the regular season (93) and playoffs (94) chronologically.Here's two links:http://www.kcchiefs.com/history/90s/The 1994 Chiefs hosted the 49ers in the home opener, but the team that defeated the streaking Oilers and lost at Buffalo in the AFCC was the 1993 Chiefs.1994 KC Chiefs. Add Joe Montana and Marcus Allen to an already prolific D! The Chiefs replaced Arrowhead's astroturf with natural grass for big Joe "he needs no knickname" Montana. How is that for clout?!?
In the home opener, Montana's KC Chiefs defeats Steve Young's SF 49rs. Oh the drama! They get all the way to the AFC divisional championship, defeating the heavily favored Oilers, who were on an 11 game win streak...Only to be bested by the Bills who claim their 4th in a row AFC Title. The Bills of course go on to lose the SB for the 4th time in a row.
Daaaaaaaaaaang!
And to add insult to injury......this was a home game for the Dolphins.I think that 84-85 Dolphins team that lost to the Pats and therefor did not get to the Super Bowl was ppretty good. IIRC, they were the only team to beat the Bears that year and were expected to roll to the SB for a very anticipated rematch. Unfortunately they lost in the AFC Championship game and the Patriots suited up (and that is about it) for the big game.
That team was JUNK. I live in KC, they were fraud's... that team wasn't in the top 20 of best teams not to win a super bowl.when a friggin' washed up marcus allen and joe montana are your front-runners. it's sick.You misunderstand, Jerk. I'm not arguing with you. I provided a link to the history! Anyway, I still think the 93-94 Chiefs were the best team NOT to make the SB.
I'm with you, Dentist.I remember the first playoff game they played that year, wild card vs. the Steelers. The Steelers controlled most of the game and had a 7-point lead late. KC blocked a punt and scored to force OT. That was a 9-7 Steelers team that outplayed them in KC.Oh, and the 30-13 loss in Buffalo doesn't sound like a real close one.That team was JUNK. I live in KC, they were fraud's... that team wasn't in the top 20 of best teams not to win a super bowl.when a friggin' washed up marcus allen and joe montana are your front-runners. it's sick.You misunderstand, Jerk. I'm not arguing with you. I provided a link to the history! Anyway, I still think the 93-94 Chiefs were the best team NOT to make the SB.
I'm thinking there are some 49ers teams - maybe '93 or '95 that were just damn good but ran into the Cowboys, but still would've won the super bowl easily.and for that matter the '94 cowboys would also likely have won the super bowl if not for the niners.I'm sure there have been a lot more conference championship games that were really the super bowl in disguise that had some great teams.