My guess is that the talk John speaks of is the talk he had with a buddy at a Chicago truck stop. Really grown tired of this guy's unfounded rumors and speculation. Unless he wants to provide sources, I'm of the opinion he simply posts things that run around in his head.FoxSports.com's John Czarnecki writes there is "talk" in Chicago that Rex Grossman has two more games to "get it right" or the team will turn to Brian Griese.If Grossman can't look good against a depleted Dallas secondary, he could be running out of time.
I don't know if Rex is the answer or not. He is however one of the best QB's in recent memory for us. (Not saying a lot but it's true). I really think Olsen is going to benefit Rex. Rex is/was at his best when using the equal inconsistent Desmond Clark .Do I think Griese is the answer either? No.As a Bears fan, Rex is not the answer. We knew that last year. He's a short, inconsistent QB that makes WAY too many mental errors, including a multitude of fumbled snaps. It sucks to know that we're wasting an elite defense with Grossman...
He hasn't even played yet. Believing he'll make that much of a difference for Rex is just wishful thinking, imo.As for Rex, I've been a backer of his since the beginning, but my patience has finally worn thin. I'm sure Lovie's has also. If a miracle doesn't occur over the next couple weeks, you have to get him out of there.I don't know if Rex is the answer or not. He is however one of the best QB's in recent memory for us. (Not saying a lot but it's true). I really think Olsen is going to benefit Rex. Rex is/was at his best when using the equal inconsistent Desmond Clark .Do I think Griese is the answer either? No.As a Bears fan, Rex is not the answer. We knew that last year. He's a short, inconsistent QB that makes WAY too many mental errors, including a multitude of fumbled snaps. It sucks to know that we're wasting an elite defense with Grossman...
True, but Griese is a lot less likely to give a game away with a bad INT.Rex may not be the answer, but Griese isn't much of an upgrade. They need to find a real solution next year.
As a Bears fan, Rex is not the answer. We knew that last year. He's a short, inconsistent QB that makes WAY too many mental errors, including a multitude of fumbled snaps. It sucks to know that we're wasting an elite defense with Grossman...
are you serious?trust me, you don't want anyone with the last name of Claussen running your huddles ... EVER!jimmy claussen in '09 as he come out early..
What makes you think that?True, but Griese is a lot less likely to give a game away with a bad INT.Rex may not be the answer, but Griese isn't much of an upgrade. They need to find a real solution next year.
I want to see what Griese can do though. It's been a while since I've seen Griese's games for Denver. He wasn't a HOF'er for sure. But I don't remember him being anywhere near as erratic as Grossman. I don't think Grossman has done anything that should keep the Bears from giving Griese an opportunity.He hasn't even played yet. Believing he'll make that much of a difference for Rex is just wishful thinking, imo.I don't know if Rex is the answer or not. He is however one of the best QB's in recent memory for us. (Not saying a lot but it's true). I really think Olsen is going to benefit Rex. Rex is/was at his best when using the equal inconsistent Desmond Clark .Do I think Griese is the answer either? No.As a Bears fan, Rex is not the answer. We knew that last year. He's a short, inconsistent QB that makes WAY too many mental errors, including a multitude of fumbled snaps. It sucks to know that we're wasting an elite defense with Grossman...
Can't disagree with you here.I want to see what Griese can do though. It's been a while since I've seen Griese's games for Denver. He wasn't a HOF'er for sure. But I don't remember him being anywhere near as erratic as Grossman. I don't think Grossman has done anything that should keep the Bears from giving Griese an opportunity.He hasn't even played yet. Believing he'll make that much of a difference for Rex is just wishful thinking, imo.I don't know if Rex is the answer or not. He is however one of the best QB's in recent memory for us. (Not saying a lot but it's true). I really think Olsen is going to benefit Rex. Rex is/was at his best when using the equal inconsistent Desmond Clark .Do I think Griese is the answer either? No.As a Bears fan, Rex is not the answer. We knew that last year. He's a short, inconsistent QB that makes WAY too many mental errors, including a multitude of fumbled snaps. It sucks to know that we're wasting an elite defense with Grossman...
WhyTF are they giving him more games? This is BS. Watch, he'll have 1 good game and 1 mediocre game and they'll say he's "got it right" and we'll have to see even more of this idiot!!!!!!!!2 more weeks is 2 weeks too many
ALMOST willing to endure a losing season with either Grossman or Griese if it means that they finally wake up in the offseason and make a move at QB.WhyTF are they giving him more games? This is BS. Watch, he'll have 1 good game and 1 mediocre game and they'll say he's "got it right" and we'll have to see even more of this idiot!!!!!!!!2 more weeks is 2 weeks too many![]()
IMO it ain't never gonna happen. Rex isflapgreen said:Come one Rex. Figure it out. PLEASE!!!!
I'd say Griese was a bit better than just a game manager. He was a pro-bowler in 2000 and put up top-15 fantasy numbers in 2001 and 2004.All the QB has to do in Chicago is manage the game. Grossman has proved that he cannot do it. Griese can. He did it in Denver and can definately do it in Chicago.
Without a doubt.Even a David Carr would be a better option at this point.For all the injury cheering in NJ on opening day, I bet the Bears would love a Chad Pennington on their team.
Unfortunately, one of Rex's most positive attributes is exactly what you are asking them to take away. The biggest difference between last season and this is that he isn't winging the ball. If the WR's can't make adjustments and catches, that was where they needed to upgrade in the off-season (Antonio Bryant?). If they're going to go into that mode, they might as well give the ball to Orton as they did in '05. The bottom line is, that they will probably give him the Detroit game to get it together and keep him on a short leash. Both Rex and Griese are getting equal reps in practice this week.as bad as grossman has looked, chicago can't mix it up. what they should do is to change the play calling substantially and have grossman go into trent dilfer mode and just not make mistakes. they have grossman winging the ball all over the field when they should be much more conservative.griese does not give them a better chance to win. they need to get a QB in next year's draft like a JDB who will likely be there for them later in the first round or 2nd round. although if he doesn't get his low release fixed that has balls batted down at the LOS you may not even want him.
Lovie was just on 670 the Score, here in Chicago, and was very non committal to Rex. This is the first time ever, besides when Rex was injured, where Lovie did not clearly state "Rex is our starter." He stated that it will be clear who the starter is come Wednesday's practice, as that is when they will begin game planning for Detroit.
Take it however you want, but I think Rex is 3rd string this weekend.
The people who didn't agree, as early as late last regular season, were in denial.Can we all agree Griese > Grossman yet ?
I totally missed the boat on this, well almost. At least I picked him off of waivers and have been freaking happy ever since Mannnnnnn!Can we all agree Griese > Grossman yet ?
Packers, Lions or Vikings fan?Personally, I would prefer to see Grossman at the helm ... all day long.
Packers, Lions or Vikings fan?Personally, I would prefer to see Grossman at the helm ... all day long.