roadkill1292
Footballguy
From what I see of his quoted posts, this stealthycat fellow might have a small penis.
Sorry, I missed one..I noticed you don't want to save the 40,000 + people who die from second hand smoke every year. Why is that?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/10/31/las-vegas-police-say-officer-accidentally-fired-weapon-inside-gunmans-hotel-suite/?utm_term=.45e10ab0d392I'll counter with show me one place that they put armed guards, it didn't help and they removed them because of all the issues.
Any ?
Is this the same polling firm that predicted Hillary would beat Trump?https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2521
67% of the nation wants an assault rifle ban.
I'll take things people who don't understand polling or margin of error say for $500, Alex.Is this the same polling firm that predicted Hillary would beat Trump?
Thank you. You seem to have firm beliefs but admitting that banning semi-auto weapons can help, even if it is just one life, is common ground. We should be looking towards common ground.of course it would, if it were that simple
would banning smoking same lives every year ? a yes or no will do, and if its a yes (which is has to be) .... why are those thousands of lives not a top priority ?
every human life matters, especially the innocents ......... school shooters are awful but the numbers pale in comparison to the dead kids from drunk drivers, auto accidents, overdoses, texting and driving, other violent acts, smoking, prescription meds ......... I know, CNN headline news is what the left sees and so they must do something
while all the other deaths are merely a cost we have to live in a free society huh ?
You can just say "I don't know how polls work or what they mean so I'm going to ignore this." It'll get your point across.Is this the same polling firm that predicted Hillary would beat Trump?
Polls are very subjective based on audience, I bet they didn’t survey many people from SD,MN,ND, WI, WY, MO, I sure many were from CA, NY, IL. For the record I am not a fan of these type of guns, but I believe issue is shared with School’s lack of security, nobody’s bringing these type of guns to airports with the security they have. FBI/law enforcement needed to follow up on everyone in regards to the leads they receive. And all people need to report people with crazy behavior to the police, rather then kicking them out of their homes or putting their heads in the sand.
when I was in high school I would see at least 10 pickups in the parking lot with shotguns or semiautomatic Rifles some up to 300 mag power hanging from the back window, but no one took them out at school. Society needs some help when it comes to moral behavior.
Again....has nothing to do with what you replied to. But when it comes to Trump I will always take the "I'll believe it when I see it" position. I don't think he'll do anything meaningful in this area. He's certainly not going to write legislation. I don't think he's capable of writing legislation actually. Regardless, I'm pretty confident he'll follow his beloved NRA and not follow through on hisnews flash
Trump is spearheading 21 of age to buy guns, bump stocks illegal and arming schools
do you want to side bet he gets those done ?
All you asked for was a place where we once had armed guards that we don't any longer. Banks are the perfect example of that. Because you want to shift the goal posts doesn't change the fact HF provided you exactly what you asked forpoor example
people don't go to banks to kill people and commit mass murders and violence, they go there to steal
I guess if people were going to schools to steal things you'd have a point. Also i assume all bank robberies have stopped ? No ?
Meanwhile the population of just Cali crushes the population of those states combined. Are we a democracy or not?Is this the same polling firm that predicted Hillary would beat Trump?
Polls are very subjective based on audience, I bet they didn’t survey many people from SD,MN,ND, WI, WY, MO, I sure many were from CA, NY, IL. For the record I am not a fan of these type of guns, but I believe issue is shared with School’s lack of security, nobody’s bringing these type of guns to airports with the security they have. FBI/law enforcement needed to follow up on everyone in regards to the leads they receive. And all people need to report people with crazy behavior to the police, rather then kicking them out of their homes or putting their heads in the sand.
when I was in high school I would see at least 10 pickups in the parking lot with shotguns or semiautomatic Rifles some up to 300 mag power hanging from the back window, but no one took them out at school. Society needs some help when it comes to moral behavior.
We already have armed schools. Would you like to step out on a limb and put a quantifiable measure on this prediction? What standard will we use to prove "drop bigly"? What kind of quantifiable drop are we talking about here? This requires stepping out from behind your dumb talking points and engaging in real discussion. Game?how about federal building ? airports/planes? how do you think concert security is handled now? theater and mall security ? did society demand banning any of those things ? no ..... society said lets put better safety in place to stop those rare wackos, a defense that can stop them when they break every laws we have
we can argue this for days- ya'll don't want armed guards, but your'e going to see them in schools more and more. Tough it up, you didn't want Trump President either, and you have him. You CAN email your reps and ask them to work with Trump on how to get it all done, how to best do it. You can do that.
or you can protest and ask for safe places and puppies to cuddle ......... if that works for you, ok, do that
and in 2-3 years you're going to see armed schools, well defended and safe schools and school shootings drop bigly
The real question is how are your likes so low? The "right leaning" FBGs among us usually like each other's posts into bigly like numbers.how about federal building ? airports/planes? how do you think concert security is handled now? theater and mall security ? did society demand banning any of those things ? no ..... society said lets put better safety in place to stop those rare wackos, a defense that can stop them when they break every laws we have
we can argue this for days- ya'll don't want armed guards, but your'e going to see them in schools more and more. Tough it up, you didn't want Trump President either, and you have him. You CAN email your reps and ask them to work with Trump on how to get it all done, how to best do it. You can do that.
or you can protest and ask for safe places and puppies to cuddle ......... if that works for you, ok, do that
and in 2-3 years you're going to see armed schools, well defended and safe schools and school shootings drop bigly
I was thinking about this today, and while I am much more on the side of doing something about the guns, IF it came down to it and the only solution that we had was to secure the schools more I would rather have teachers volunteer for it. Sure he took the job, but I think part of why you see the cops reaction vs. the kids in the school and the coach is because he didn't have the emotional connection to the kids. I think it would be much better if there were teacher willing to do it or had some training in the past. I guess I am saying I would probably rather have my son's teacher/coach voluntarily training for that and doing it than Joe Blow security guy. Again, I there are several things I would prefer before turning to armed guards and teachers at the schools.Thank you. You seem to have firm beliefs but admitting that banning semi-auto weapons can help, even if it is just one life, is common ground. We should be looking towards common ground.
Going back to my point earlier, I think both sides can also agree that adding security of some sort, armed or not, can help as well. I haven't seen anyone here say to arm Linda the lunch lady as others have joked but even if you recommend that maybe if a teacher was former military and his expertise might be beneficial, right away someone throws out PTSD. Just because the security guard in Parkland failed, it shouldn't be used as an example of why having armed guards won't help in certain situations. The security guard in California overheard that kids plan and it was stopped. It doesn't always have to be at the moment of attack.
It seems that even when a pro-gun person comes in and gives good ideas and shows themselves to be agreeable to change, they get attacked for things they don't agree with since they don't go far enough. And no, I'm not new to the FFA obviously and having like 8 different gun related threads doesn't help but it seems like we've reached saturation on opinions and people are already starting to hold their ground and bringing up the same things over and over. Maybe less snark and less attacking and maybe look towards some common ground to have a better discussion.
I hear you.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/23/health/texas-guns-school-district-trnd/index.html.Scott proposed a $450 million initiative for student safety, calling for the presence of a resource officer in every public school and giving sheriffs' departments the power "to train additional school personnel or reserve law enforcement officers" if local school boards ask
Okay. We can use one of your categories.how about federal building ? airports/planes? how do you think concert security is handled now? theater and mall security ? did society demand banning any of those things ? no ..... society said lets put better safety in place to stop those rare wackos, a defense that can stop them when they break every laws we have
we can argue this for days- ya'll don't want armed guards, but your'e going to see them in schools more and more. Tough it up, you didn't want Trump President either, and you have him. You CAN email your reps and ask them to work with Trump on how to get it all done, how to best do it. You can do that.
or you can protest and ask for safe places and puppies to cuddle ......... if that works for you, ok, do that
and in 2-3 years you're going to see armed schools, well defended and safe schools and school shootings drop bigly
I think he was just a coward. I wouldn’t need an emotional connection to a specific group of kids if I was armed and could possibly prevent their slaughter.I was thinking about this today, and while I am much more on the side of doing something about the guns, IF it came down to it and the only solution that we had was to secure the schools more I would rather have teachers volunteer for it. Sure he took the job, but I think part of why you see the cops reaction vs. the kids in the school and the coach is because he didn't have the emotional connection to the kids. I think it would be much better if there were teacher willing to do it or had some training in the past. I guess I am saying I would probably rather have my son's teacher/coach voluntarily training for that and doing it than Joe Blow security guy. Again, I there are several things I would prefer before turning to armed guards and teachers at the schools.
I don't track likes ... that's not important to me and this board is filled with liberals views and I love to talk and discuss with people who don't see things how I doThe real question is how are your likes so low? The "right leaning" FBGs among us usually like each other's posts into bigly like numbers.
I didn't say it would fix everything either. If it had to come down to the two choices I would probably go with the volunteer teacher is all I am saying.I think he was just a coward. I wouldn’t need an emotional connection to a specific group of kids if I was armed and could possibly prevent their slaughter.
I don't have kids and don't really know the school environment anymore, so I don't feel qualified enough to give an opinion on it. But I have read, and posted, articles where parents and teachers feel much safer knowing that there is armed security, whether it is a teacher or guard, in the school. I'm guessing there are plenty of schools where there isn't a single person qualified to hold that responsibility but there clearly are some that could.I was thinking about this today, and while I am much more on the side of doing something about the guns, IF it came down to it and the only solution that we had was to secure the schools more I would rather have teachers volunteer for it. Sure he took the job, but I think part of why you see the cops reaction vs. the kids in the school and the coach is because he didn't have the emotional connection to the kids. I think it would be much better if there were teacher willing to do it or had some training in the past. I guess I am saying I would probably rather have my son's teacher/coach voluntarily training for that and doing it than Joe Blow security guy. Again, I there are several things I would prefer before turning to armed guards and teachers at the schools.
I agree. There would have to be extensive training and mental health checks, but I don’t think arming volunteer teachers is a bad idea.I didn't say it would fix everything either. If it had to come down to the two choices I would probably go with the volunteer teacher is all I am saying.
Thank you. You seem to have firm beliefs but admitting that banning semi-auto weapons can help, even if it is just one life, is common ground. We should be looking towards common ground.
we need laws that keeps mentally ill from getting all guns, from under 18 and 21 having guns that laws says they can't ... we need laws that say don't kill people
with all that, we should be good right ? you are confusing semi-auto with AR15 guns ... they're not the same. AR15 style guns are not the #1 guns used in school shootings and if they disappear tomorrow, these young people will just swap out to a shotgun or handgun right? That's ignoring the core problem.
Going back to my point earlier, I think both sides can also agree that adding security of some sort, armed or not, can help as well. I haven't seen anyone here say to arm Linda the lunch lady as others have joked but even if you recommend that maybe if a teacher was former military and his expertise might be beneficial, right away someone throws out PTSD. Just because the security guard in Parkland failed, it shouldn't be used as an example of why having armed guards won't help in certain situations. The security guard in California overheard that kids plan and it was stopped. It doesn't always have to be at the moment of attack.
oh, yeah, several people are totally against armed guards at schools read back through. I 100% disagree with them
It seems that even when a pro-gun person comes in and gives good ideas and shows themselves to be agreeable to change, they get attacked for things they don't agree with since they don't go far enough. And no, I'm not new to the FFA obviously and having like 8 different gun related threads doesn't help but it seems like we've reached saturation on opinions and people are already starting to hold their ground and bringing up the same things over and over. Maybe less snark and less attacking and maybe look towards some common ground to have a better discussion.
I hear you.![]()
and this you are absolutely right on, its what I completely dropped one thread I was in, nothing was being accomplished at that point
6 pack of beer says 2 of the 3 things he asked for will get doneI don't think he'll do anything meaningful in this area.
I strongly object to this idea. In fact if it was ever instituted in my kids school I would pull them out. Dead serious. I think it’s a horrible idea that would cause a lot more deaths than it would save, and I would feel far less safe as a parent.I agree. There would have to be extensive training and mental health checks, but I don’t think arming volunteer teachers is a bad idea.
It is among the worst ideas ever. The fact it has been given any serious consideration by anybody is an abomination.I strongly object to this idea. In fact if it was ever instituted in my kids school I would pull them out. Dead serious. I think it’s a horrible idea that would cause a lot more deaths than it would save, and I would feel far less safe as a parent.
I 100% support that too.the Republicans are not going to give an inch on gun control.
get ready to pull them outI strongly object to this idea. In fact if it was ever instituted in my kids school I would pull them out. Dead serious. I think it’s a horrible idea that would cause a lot more deaths than it would save, and I would feel far less safe as a parent.
Maybe bump stocks.news flash
Trump is spearheading 21 of age to buy guns, bump stocks illegal and arming schools
do you want to side bet he gets those done ?
I strongly object to this idea. In fact if it was ever instituted in my kids school I would pull them out. Dead serious. I think it’s a horrible idea that would cause a lot more deaths than it would save, and I would feel far less safe as a parent.
How about armed security guards?It is among the worst ideas ever. The fact it has been given any serious consideration by anybody is an abomination.
I’m OK with that, but not as an alternative to reasonable gun control and spending on mental health.How about armed security guards?
Would the person who had the gun stolen from them be under any possible legal action if it was shown that they were negligent in securing it? Will the gun have been registered under that person?I'm for raising the age to 21 on gun purchases - not that it will impact 16 year old kids stealing guns and killing people, but today's youth are proving too irresponsible and adolescent to own guns at 18
I think moving the voting age, driving age, marriage ages etc has to be looked at too. If society is losing trust in these youths, it all needs addressed
I think maybe I am just being too dismissive of the level of security guard that would end up patrolling our schools.I’m OK with that, but not as an alternative to reasonable gun control and spending on mental health.
Of course not.I’m OK with that, but not as an alternative to reasonable gun control and spending on mental health.
You don't think very highly of your children, do you?I'm for raising the age to 21 on gun purchases - not that it will impact 16 year old kids stealing guns and killing people, but today's youth are proving too irresponsible and adolescent to own guns at 18
I think moving the voting age, driving age, marriage ages etc has to be looked at too. If society is losing trust in these youths, it all needs addressed
Well, I am not against that idea, in theory, but Parkland had a sheriff's deputy on site as a resource officer and it did no good. The cost would be incredible, however, to have a meaningful number of armed and well-trained security people on public high school campuses all over the country. But those are practical objections.How about armed security guards?
A lot of young people are losing their trust in society right now.I'm for raising the age to 21 on gun purchases - not that it will impact 16 year old kids stealing guns and killing people, but today's youth are proving too irresponsible and adolescent to own guns at 18
I think moving the voting age, driving age, marriage ages etc has to be looked at too. If society is losing trust in these youths, it all needs addressed
Agreed. Although, what would be your opinion of allowing a teacher that already had a conceal carry permit and taken tactical response classes to carry of his/her own free accord?Well, I am not against that idea, in theory, but Parkland had a sheriff's deputy on site as a resource officer and it did no good. The cost would be incredible, however, to have a meaningful number of armed and well-trained security people on public high school campuses all over the country. But those are practical objections.
Suggesting that teachers should arm themselves or be required to be armed is the idea that sucks.
Several reasons. First because a teacher’s job is to teach. A professional armed guard’s job is to protect.I think maybe I am just being too dismissive of the level of security guard that would end up patrolling our schools.
I am against forcing teachers to take this on, but I am curious if it came down to it why you would be more against a teacher or two volunteering for this duty vs. having an armed guard at the school?
Against.Agreed. Although, what would be your opinion of allowing a teacher that already had a conceal carry permit and taken tactical response classes to carry of his/her own free accord?
In Orange County all LEO receive training at the Police Academy. It lasts about 6 months and it’s very intensive.Where do most cops do their weapons training? Are they private facilities that the state pays for or are they part of each precinct? Or whatever they are called in different areas. Do retired cops still get to train there?
Very small quibble, and not sure the results would have been different if worded differently, but they wanted a ban on the sale of the assault rifle in that question - not a complete ban. What I mean is that banning the sale of them will do nothing to the ~5m (or 15m, I've seen lots of numbers) in the market today.https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2521
67% of the nation wants an assault rifle ban.
I get you and agree.Several reasons. First because a teacher’s job is to teach. A professional armed guard’s job is to protect.
Second because an armed guard in most instances has had years of firearm training. Usually they are former law enforcement officers which means they have also had training in the proper use of force, dealing with bad people, discerning between threats and non-threats, etc. in nearly every instance I would trust them more.
But honestly I’m not in love with armed guards either. I’m willing to accept them as a possible necessity because there are just too many damn guns in our society and fanatics prevent us from properly restricting them. But I am skeptical that they will be much good against crazies with assault rifles.
I meant more in their continuing training. Do they go monthly, quarterly? So probably still at an Academy.In Orange County all LEO receive training at the Police Academy. It lasts about 6 months and it’s very intensive.
For sure.I keep saying it but nobody is considering the overall societal impacts of turning schools, places of learning, into armed compounds. The suggestion is absolutely ridiculous.
I’m sure that would work but how much money would it save?I meant more in their continuing training. Do they go monthly, quarterly? So probably still at an Academy.
Just wondering if a retired police officer who became a security guard could be allowed to train on a regular basis there as a way to save money.