I don't believe it.
I am sure it was the cheaper option.Seems stupid to have those systems connected.
Maybe. It might also just have been something the programmers never expected to happen. How often would someone be trying to attack the software that can only be accessed from inside of the plane? I guess that is where "cheaper" comes in, takes time and money to think of those weird edge cases and code for them.I am sure it was the cheaper option.Seems stupid to have those systems connected.
Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?
I believe it.I don't believe it.
Umm, ancillary revenue?Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?
it's really not butter...I believe it.I don't believe it.
Looks like FBg has a guagmire.I believe it.I don't believe it.
Looks like an attention seeker to me.He did, however, admit to Wired that the part about hacking in-flight entertainment systems is true. He claims he didn't do anything beyond exploring the networks a little bit and "observing traffic" on them—a lot less scary than what the FBI's affidavit claims.
He also could be scared ####less that he's going to be going away for awhile.Now he's changed his story:
Looks like an attention seeker to me.He did, however, admit to Wired that the part about hacking in-flight entertainment systems is true. He claims he didn't do anything beyond exploring the networks a little bit and "observing traffic" on them—a lot less scary than what the FBI's affidavit claims.
Or he's trying to avoid federal pound you in the ### prison.Now he's changed his story:
Looks like an attention seeker to me.He did, however, admit to Wired that the part about hacking in-flight entertainment systems is true. He claims he didn't do anything beyond exploring the networks a little bit and "observing traffic" on them—a lot less scary than what the FBI's affidavit claims.
This is real and it's really network security 101. The smart, more expensive way, is to have two completely separate networks. One for the plane and one for the entertainment. The second, less expensive, way is to have a firewall between the two systems. This is the way Boeing has it setup apparently. The problem is that the firewalls can be hacked and are constantly getting updates which require downtime to do and money and staff to test.Maybe. It might also just have been something the programmers never expected to happen. How often would someone be trying to attack the software that can only be accessed from inside of the plane? I guess that is where "cheaper" comes in, takes time and money to think of those weird edge cases and code for them.I am sure it was the cheaper option.Seems stupid to have those systems connected.
All of that said, I don't think he did what they claim. But I do think they want to justify putting him in jail for a long time and being able to legally restrict him from sharing whatever knowledge he has about the systems.
Why do people still subscribe to the newspaper? I'd think it's along those lines, still some stragglers/older people who don't want to opt into the new tech.Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?
He said it was a modified Cat6 (ethernet cable).IIRC, it's a USB jack next to the screen. The planes offer it to charge/power your mobile devices while in flight.This is very scary if true. How do you screen for this? We might not be great at it, but at least we scan people before boarding a plane for weapons, etc. How do you scan for someone to have the wire to hookup a laptop to the in-flight entertainment systems which interfaces with the flight computers? It seems like if you knew what you were doing that you could definitely take a plane down. That's frightening to me.
I use in flight wifi on pretty much every flight I'm on that offers it. Great way to stream content or kill time from your seat.Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?
Why do people still subscribe to the newspaper? I'd think it's along those lines, still some stragglers/older people who don't want to opt into the new tech.Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?![]()
I always fly home for Christmas on Sunday, week 16 of the NFL season. Nothing makes a cross-country flight easier than 6 hours of NFL football live on JetBlue, with bets placed beforehand so I have some rooting interest (besides my fantasy championship).
That's what scares me. Sounds like this will be up to the airlines to control/resolve from their end.Gotcha. Either way, it's impossible to screen for an off-the-shelf component that's commonplace throughout the world.He said it was a modified Cat6 (ethernet cable).IIRC, it's a USB jack next to the screen. The planes offer it to charge/power your mobile devices while in flight.This is very scary if true. How do you screen for this? We might not be great at it, but at least we scan people before boarding a plane for weapons, etc. How do you scan for someone to have the wire to hookup a laptop to the in-flight entertainment systems which interfaces with the flight computers? It seems like if you knew what you were doing that you could definitely take a plane down. That's frightening to me.
Giggity!Cjw_55106 said:Looks like FBg has a guagmire.johnnycakes said:I believe it.RedmondLonghorn said:I don't believe it.
Thomas Gabriel's the guy who shut down NORAD with a laptop just to prove a point, and you think I'm scared of you?Walking Boot said:So the feds aren't alleging he did this in court or in an actual charge, they're just saying to a judge that he said to them that he did these things at other times (not during the incident under investigation) in order to get the judge to sign a search warrant.
That's just someone swearing an affidavit that he heard the guy make the alleged claim, right?
I haven't even opted into newspapers yet. I still listen for the town crier.mquinnjr said:Why do people still subscribe to the newspaper? I'd think it's along those lines, still some stragglers/older people who don't want to opt into the new tech.Rayderr said:Why do airlines even have in flight entertainment still? Most everyone uses tablets, phones, or ipods to keep themselves entertained now. Who wants to watch an edited version of "Vampire Academy"?
Yeah, I don't get why they're yelling everyone about this, either.Really stupid to have those systems connected in any way. Should be completely discreet.
Really stupid to have those systems connected in any way. Should be completely discreet.