AnonymousBob
Footballguy
This only works in leagues with limited rosters sizes. If your rosters are large enough that you drafted the likes of Ryan Grant to start the year then this is a possible strategy you should completely ignore.
There are some players you have on your roster you will never start, barring a massive rash of injuries. Yet these players are doing just enough, or they have enough of a name that you can't drop them else they'll be snatched by another owner.
Is it really that bad a decision to release some of these players in an attempt to handcuff another owner? Say you've made it past your bye weeks and you have solid starting options at rb-if Jamal Lewis was your fourth of fifth option why wouldn't you dump the guy? He'll never play for you, you can't get much for him in a trade but there he is just sucking up roster space. The next guy you pick up (Ryan Grant?) isn't necessarily destined for greatness but they have that unkown factor-while it's unlikely they'll blow up, Lewis certainly isn't going to explode.
Has anyone else dumped guys such as this in an attempt to limit another owner's roster?
There are some players you have on your roster you will never start, barring a massive rash of injuries. Yet these players are doing just enough, or they have enough of a name that you can't drop them else they'll be snatched by another owner.
Is it really that bad a decision to release some of these players in an attempt to handcuff another owner? Say you've made it past your bye weeks and you have solid starting options at rb-if Jamal Lewis was your fourth of fifth option why wouldn't you dump the guy? He'll never play for you, you can't get much for him in a trade but there he is just sucking up roster space. The next guy you pick up (Ryan Grant?) isn't necessarily destined for greatness but they have that unkown factor-while it's unlikely they'll blow up, Lewis certainly isn't going to explode.
Has anyone else dumped guys such as this in an attempt to limit another owner's roster?
