Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub
Footballguy
He's a Hall of Famer. Could have been better perhaps, but other names, that did nothing in the NFL, like Charles Rogers (among others) come to mind first.
You don't have to have been a bust to have wasted your talent.
Anything short of achieving maximum potential involves waste. I think a handful of folks are misunderstanding that concept.and how can you possibly quantify what the maximum would be?Hint: It's impossibleYou don't have to have been a bust to have wasted your talent.Anything short of achieving maximum potential involves waste. I think a handful of folks are misunderstanding that concept.
We can ballpark it.With Randy I think it's fair to say that his maximum potential would lead him to exceed Jerry Rice by every measure.There is some waste but hardly enough for people to talk about him as if he were a slacker.and how can you possibly quantify what the maximum would be?Hint: It's impossibleYou don't have to have been a bust to have wasted your talent.Anything short of achieving maximum potential involves waste. I think a handful of folks are misunderstanding that concept.
I agree here a bit. He's obviously a HOFer. He pissed me off during his stint with the Raiders since they're my team. But, there is a difference between a guy being a "wasted talent" and a guy who "wasted his potential talent". He could have been much better but rare talents like Usain Bolt still break world records coasting in sometimes.There have been tons of players who wasted their talent a lot more than Moss did, but to an extent, Moss, despite being undoubtedly one of the top three players at his position since entering the league, did waste his. Look at his Oakland years and this year; he clearly wasn't over the hill when in Oakland, and I don't think he is now either. He simply doesn't care enough to try, so in that respect, there have been multiple times in his NFL career where he wasted his talent.
Wow, who would have thought that six other players caught their 100th TD pass with their legs.* Caught his 100th touchdown pass in 2006 against San Francisco (on a pass he caught with his legs), the seventh player to do so.

awful comparison. Iverson was one of the most competitive players in the NBA, I don't think I ever saw him take a game off - let alone a play.I don't know that Moss gets first ballot at this point though. If he had half of Rice's work ethic, he'd probably have passed Rice's numbers by now. He's an athletic freak but its all talent. Randy Moss is the Allen Iverson of the NFL.Yep, that HOF'er could have been somebody.
How did these two waste their talent? Kurt by marrying a wildebeast and Chad by carelessly getting his arm ripped off three times?For more wasted talent ... Kurt Warner .... Chad Pennington...? And that's just at QB.

I don't know that Moss gets first ballot at this point though. If he had half of Rice's work ethic, he'd probably have passed Rice's numbers by now. He's an athletic freak but its all talent. Randy Moss is the Allen Iverson of the NFL.Yep, that HOF'er could have been somebody.
perfect comparison. Wonder if Moss will be playing in Germany next year.This literally might be the single worst sports comparison I've ever heard in my 30+ years on this earth. Iverson was a wildly undersized 2 guard who made up for what he lacked in size for the position with quickness and toughness. He never took a game off or even a play off. His teammates by and large loved him, and so did most of the fans of the teams for which he played.I don't know that Moss gets first ballot at this point though. If he had half of Rice's work ethic, he'd probably have passed Rice's numbers by now. He's an athletic freak but its all talent. Randy Moss is the Allen Iverson of the NFL.Yep, that HOF'er could have been somebody.perfect comparison. Wonder if Moss will be playing in Germany next year.
Please tell me this is a joke.He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.Very few players who ever come to the NFL have the potential to become the greatest player who ever played the game, at any position. Randy Moss had that potential. He demonstrated it.
Then, in a combination of laziness and self-centeredness, he threw it away. Did he achieve great things? Of course; but he could have been the greatest.
What? Isn't it pretty much a given that Moss has been a slacker on many, many occasions?There is some waste but hardly enough for people to talk about him as if he were a slacker.
He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.
Heck, he might* not even be the 2nd best of his era, as arguments could easily be made that Owens and Harrison were better.
Huge difference between slacking off on the field by giving less than full effort on certain plays in season in which you're not targeted, and slacking off on your conditioning and preparation in such a way as to make you a less effective wide receiver. The latter is what most of us consider a "waste of talent." To my knowledge Moss has never been accused of the latter to any significant extent. Since there's plenty of people who HAVE wasted their talent by not working hard on conditioning and preparation, it seems kind of stupid to say that Moss is the biggest waste of talent ever, yes?What? Isn't it pretty much a given that Moss has been a slacker on many, many occasions?There is some waste but hardly enough for people to talk about him as if he were a slacker.
Even if I grant you that Moss is the third-best receiver of his era- which even you seem to agree is a real stretch considering that he will easily pass those guys in every relevant category by the time he's 35- how does that make him a bigger "waste of talent" than the dozens of guys who were drafted in the first half of the first round to skill positions but never became All-Pros like Moss because they had discipline/work ethic problems?He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.Heck, he might* not even be the 2nd best of his era, as arguments could easily be made that Owens and Harrison were better.
*Note that I say might, so don't flip out.![]()
Moss has that rare ability (like Curtis Martin) to look like he's not running fast when he really is. It's really pretty hard to explain if you weren't a Martin fan. I do believe he's been a slacker but also that he's been called one when he wasn't.This post here, this concept, is why Moss is so awesome. If for arguments sakes we call all three "just as good" then those two worked their tail off to be that good while Moss cruised to it. Then again, the greatest athletes always make it seem easy. We knew Rice worked super hard off the field, but he didn't always seem it (esp when younger) on the field. It's very hard to gauge effort on the field from these types that make it look easy.He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.Heck, he might* not even be the 2nd best of his era, as arguments could easily be made that Owens and Harrison were better.
*Note that I say might, so don't flip out.![]()
I never said that it did. Reread my first post in this thread (somewhere on Page 1). To reiterate, Moss is not the biggest waste of talent ever...not even close. But there have been seasons where he has completely wasted his talent - '05, '06' and '10 - so at times, yes, he has completely wasted his talent. Besides, not all talent is created equal. Like others have said, Moss could have been the best football player, not just WR, EVER. That is why some think he wasted a bit of his talent. Yes, many, many others have wasted talent on a much greater scale, in the sense that they never become quality NFL players when they had the ability to do so, but that doesn't mean that Moss hasn't wasted some of his talent at times. It is just different.Even if I grant you that Moss is the third-best receiver of his era- which even you seem to agree is a real stretch considering that he will easily pass those guys in every relevant category by the time he's 35- how does that make him a bigger "waste of talent" than the dozens of guys who were drafted in the first half of the first round to skill positions but never became All-Pros like Moss because they had discipline/work ethic problems?He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.Heck, he might* not even be the 2nd best of his era, as arguments could easily be made that Owens and Harrison were better.
*Note that I say might, so don't flip out.![]()
Why do people think this? He was slightly ahead of his time, but he was basically a slightly skinner prototype for the Andre Johnson/Calvin Johnson type that can combine a deep threat with an ideal red zone target (to borrow from my earlier post, it's also the David Terrell/Charles Rogers type). I think we mostly agree. I just don't understand where we got this fiction about his vast potential that's unlike anything we've ever seen, like he's 6'9", runs a 3.9 40 yard dash, and can shoot webs from his wrists to secure passes. He's a physical freak, yes, but there's been a lot of those, many of which don't have nearly the career that Moss has had. Sure he could have been a little better, especially in certain seasons. There I'm with you. I just don't understand the idea that his career is even in the Top 1000 as far as wasting talent.I never said that it did. Reread my first post in this thread (somewhere on Page 1). To reiterate, Moss is not the biggest waste of talent ever...not even close. But there have been seasons where he has completely wasted his talent - '05, '06' and '10 - so at times, yes, he has completely wasted his talent. Besides, not all talent is created equal. Like others have said, Moss could have been the best football player, not just WR, EVER. That is why some think he wasted a bit of his talent. Yes, many, many others have wasted talent on a much greater scale, in the sense that they never become quality NFL players when they had the ability to do so, but that doesn't mean that Moss hasn't wasted some of his talent at times. It is just different.Even if I grant you that Moss is the third-best receiver of his era- which even you seem to agree is a real stretch considering that he will easily pass those guys in every relevant category by the time he's 35- how does that make him a bigger "waste of talent" than the dozens of guys who were drafted in the first half of the first round to skill positions but never became All-Pros like Moss because they had discipline/work ethic problems?He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.Heck, he might* not even be the 2nd best of his era, as arguments could easily be made that Owens and Harrison were better.
*Note that I say might, so don't flip out.![]()
And, no, I don't think it is a stretch that he is the 3rd best WR of his era. I think it is that close between Moss, Harrison and Owens, that you can put them in any order, and it would be hard to argue against it, regardless of overall numbers, which don't always tell the whole tale.
Good post.Lol at the couch potatoes on this board. They need to realize that its impossible to do what Moss has done at the NFL level, for as long as he has, without already having a strong work ethic. He's been a top-tier WR in the NFL for 12 years. That's impossible to achieve as a lazy bum. Absolutely impossible.Please tell me this is a joke.He's the second-greatest ever at his position, and the greatest was just named the greatest at any position in the history of the NFL.Very few players who ever come to the NFL have the potential to become the greatest player who ever played the game, at any position. Randy Moss had that potential. He demonstrated it.
Then, in a combination of laziness and self-centeredness, he threw it away. Did he achieve great things? Of course; but he could have been the greatest.
I think maybe you don't understand what "threw it away" means. David Terrell threw his talent away. Charles Rogers threw his talent away. Randy Moss is the second-best wide receiver ever to play the game.
You're also totally wrong about what was expected of him when he came into the league. Even the most optimistic projections pre-draft had him in the early first round, but never in the top couple picks, which is where he obviously would have gone despite character questions if he really did come into the NFL having already demonstrated the "potential to become the greatest player who ever played the game."
Here's a pre-draft analysis of him. There's a big difference between "one of the most physically gifted players to come along in several years" and showing "the potential to become the greatest player who ever played the game."
You need to come back to reality.
That's true- in fact I've actually defended him elsewhere. I think it's because he didn't show any desire to recover from the injury, and then developed substance abuse problems which demonstrated his lack of discipline. The waste is that we never found out what he could have been.I don't understand the Charles Rogers stuff. Maybe many would be shocked to be reminded that Germaine Crowell was the most productive WR per game for a little while there. He wrecked his knee and was done. Why not him then? Rogers kept hurting his shoulder and/or collarbone and coming back only to do it again. Pre2010, I understand Mike Williams but Rogers? Collarbone is a tough NFL injury to overcome. I know it doesn't seem it but...
He's a Hall of Famer, but he had the talent to be the best of all times. Too bad he is too much of a headcase to allow this to be possible.
Anyone actually gonna bother linking to anything reputable suggesting that he is miles ahead of anyone else in terms of raw talent? Or is the plan to say just it over and over without backing it up?I linked to a pre-draft evaluation calling him one of the most talented players of the last several years. I think it's fair to say that he developed into one of the best WRs of his generation, at a minimum. So he met or exceeded those expectations. It's true that we hadn't really seen a WR with his combination of size and speed when he first arrived, but since then we've seen several.He's a Hall of Famer, but he had the talent to be the best of all times. Too bad he is too much of a headcase to allow this to be possible.![]()
Curious how you'll reply to this link as my reply http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BardRa00.htmAnyone actually gonna bother linking to anything reputable suggesting that he is miles ahead of anyone else in terms of raw talent?
You don't slack yourself to the numbers he has put up.What? Isn't it pretty much a given that Moss has been a slacker on many, many occasions?There is some waste but hardly enough for people to talk about him as if he were a slacker.
I'm confused?I see that the guy is ridiculously gifted and not a particularly productive receiver to date. Not sure how it's relevant to the perception of Moss.Curious how you'll reply to this link as my reply http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BardRa00.htmAnyone actually gonna bother linking to anything reputable suggesting that he is miles ahead of anyone else in terms of raw talent?
"Number eighty-four don't stretch... I came out of the womb ready to play!"-MossI would argue that Randy Moss got the most out of his talent.. and purely on talent alone. His greatest gifts - speed and body control - both drop off with age. He never was a guy that could sell a route, get in-and-out of breaks (wrong body type), or get on the ground quickly to scoop up a low ball (also wrong body type)... all of which are required attributes to reliably move the chains. I'm not sure an attitude adjustment or better work ethic would gain him much more than he has accomplished already (and we all agree that his body of work is already quite awesome).Not this season. "I don't really care what people think or say about me, because I'm my own man.""I can't really have any friends. It's sad, really. It's lonely. But that's how I am.""I play when I want to play." "It's not that I'm mad or trying to be disgruntled. I'm hurt. You give me a word," "Sometimes you want your boss to tell you you're doing a good job. That's every man or woman who works for somebody. ... And that's just the way with football. If you do a good job and think that you're doing a good job, you want to be appreciated. I really don't think that — me, personally — that I'm appreciated."-Moss
QFT. This thread is ridiculousAnyone actually gonna bother linking to anything reputable suggesting that he is miles ahead of anyone else in terms of raw talent? Or is the plan to say just it over and over without backing it up?He's a Hall of Famer, but he had the talent to be the best of all times. Too bad he is too much of a headcase to allow this to be possible.![]()
Took this from another post because there were a lot of stats and i thought that these were the most important:* 10 1,000+ yard receiving seasons - 2nd all-time* 64 career 100 yard games - 2nd all-time; most recent November 15, 2009* 153 touchdown receptions - 2nd all-time* 75.9 receiving yards per game - 2nd all-time* 154 total touchdowns scored - 4th all-time* 14,804 receiving yards - 6th all-timeYour original statement which insinuated that there never was more wasted talent is not even an opinion, this can be categorized as a fact. Moss' production is in all time category. It is simply not possible to be the guy who wasted the most talent when you're this high in so many WR statistical categories."You don't understand. I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it." (On The Waterfront)
surely we don't truly know the individuals. I know Barden works his tail off and you would think he was Tom Brady the way so many Giants were upset he got hurt. They genuinely root for him and almost all seem to think he's "their boy." He is a rare teammate.Moss has whatever stigma we've been talking about and they seem quite the opposite.I'm confused?I see that the guy is ridiculously gifted and not a particularly productive receiver to date. Not sure how it's relevant to the perception of Moss.Curious how you'll reply to this link as my reply http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BardRa00.htmAnyone actually gonna bother linking to anything reputable suggesting that he is miles ahead of anyone else in terms of raw talent?
Moss has "Talent" and "Stats" BUT he is a known SLACKER hence the wasted talent comments.Took this from another post because there were a lot of stats and i thought that these were the most important:* 10 1,000+ yard receiving seasons - 2nd all-time* 64 career 100 yard games - 2nd all-time; most recent November 15, 2009* 153 touchdown receptions - 2nd all-time* 75.9 receiving yards per game - 2nd all-time* 154 total touchdowns scored - 4th all-time* 14,804 receiving yards - 6th all-timeYour original statement which insinuated that there never was more wasted talent is not even an opinion, this can be categorized as a fact. Moss' production is in all time category. It is simply not possible to be the guy who wasted the most talent when you're this high in so many WR statistical categories."You don't understand. I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it." (On The Waterfront)
The the NFL is scattered with "could have been" like Dupree because of injuries, but I don't consider those guys wasted talents. When a guy stays healthy but doesn't have the drive to take full advantage of his ability - that's a waste.Moss will probably never say it publicly, but someday after he's retired he'll sit around and think of what his career could have been.IMO Moss is not even in the conversation of biggest waste of talent. Could he have done even more in his career? Sure. But he's accomplished a great deal. To have put up the kind of numbers and he has, to be the top TD producer on the two most prolific offenses in NFL history (teams that went a combined 34-3 in reg. season and playoffs), and to score the go ahead TD in what was 2 minutes away from being the only 19-0 season in NFL history, there is just no way to justify him as being the biggest waste of talent.In fact, to even include him in the conversation is overstating his incredible talent and understating the talents of others. There have been a lot of tremendously talented athletes who haven't even sniffed the level of success that Randy Moss has enjoyed. Too many to even list.Just the other week ESPN ran the 30 for 30 on Marcus Dupree.....that's a much bigger waste of talent than Randy Moss.
I still can't believe he's gone. Cincy was deep at WR and alot of NFL WRs wouldn't make their team. I have no clue though whats happened since Jax. He was finally getting it and producing and then it just shut off like a faucet.I'm surprised no one tried him at QB or CB or safety or any other position. His athleticism seemed phenomenal to me and there just aren't many tall DBs in the NFL.Matt Jones is a bigger waste of talent.
I think this one is spot on.The the NFL is scattered with "could have been" like Dupree because of injuries, but I don't consider those guys wasted talents. When a guy stays healthy but doesn't have the drive to take full advantage of his ability - that's a waste.Moss will probably never say it publicly, but someday after he's retired he'll sit around and think of what his career could have been.IMO Moss is not even in the conversation of biggest waste of talent. Could he have done even more in his career? Sure.
But he's accomplished a great deal. To have put up the kind of numbers and he has, to be the top TD producer on the two most prolific offenses in NFL history (teams that went a combined 34-3 in reg. season and playoffs), and to score the go ahead TD in what was 2 minutes away from being the only 19-0 season in NFL history, there is just no way to justify him as being the biggest waste of talent.
In fact, to even include him in the conversation is overstating his incredible talent and understating the talents of others. There have been a lot of tremendously talented athletes who haven't even sniffed the level of success that Randy Moss has enjoyed. Too many to even list.
Just the other week ESPN ran the 30 for 30 on Marcus Dupree.....that's a much bigger waste of talent than Randy Moss.
Randy Moss was the most physically gifted WR I've seen in my lifetime and on film. If he'd had anywhere close to Jerry Rice work ethic(or even TO, for that matter), he would have been the greatest ever. He is still one of the greats, but he could have been the G.O.A.T.I think this one is spot on.The the NFL is scattered with "could have been" like Dupree because of injuries, but I don't consider those guys wasted talents. When a guy stays healthy but doesn't have the drive to take full advantage of his ability - that's a waste.Moss will probably never say it publicly, but someday after he's retired he'll sit around and think of what his career could have been.IMO Moss is not even in the conversation of biggest waste of talent. Could he have done even more in his career? Sure.
But he's accomplished a great deal. To have put up the kind of numbers and he has, to be the top TD producer on the two most prolific offenses in NFL history (teams that went a combined 34-3 in reg. season and playoffs), and to score the go ahead TD in what was 2 minutes away from being the only 19-0 season in NFL history, there is just no way to justify him as being the biggest waste of talent.
In fact, to even include him in the conversation is overstating his incredible talent and understating the talents of others. There have been a lot of tremendously talented athletes who haven't even sniffed the level of success that Randy Moss has enjoyed. Too many to even list.
Just the other week ESPN ran the 30 for 30 on Marcus Dupree.....that's a much bigger waste of talent than Randy Moss.
Jerry Rice had 1200 yards 7 TDs on the Raiders at age 40. Randy Moss is still only 38. NOBODY had anywhere close to Rice's work ethic and endurance. He wasn't just Randy Moss, he was Randy Moss plus Pete Rose. He had the single season records AND the lifetime records. Nobody else even belongs in the conversation. Tony Gonzalez might be a distant second. This old thread is ridiculous.Randy Moss was the most physically gifted WR I've seen in my lifetime and on film. If he'd had anywhere close to Jerry Rice work ethic(or even TO, for that matter), he would have been the greatest ever. He is still one of the greats, but he could have been the G.O.A.T.
2 all time great QBs, and a 4 time pro bowler and NFL MVP QB in Gannon. That Raiders team went to the Super Bowl.Jerry Rice had 1200 yards 7 TDs on the Raiders at age 40. Randy Moss is still only 38. NOBODY had anywhere close to Rice's work ethic and endurance. He wasn't just Randy Moss, he was Randy Moss plus Pete Rose. He had the single season records AND the lifetime records. Nobody else even belongs in the conversation. Tony Gonzalez might be a distant second. This old thread is ridiculous.Randy Moss was the most physically gifted WR I've seen in my lifetime and on film. If he'd had anywhere close to Jerry Rice work ethic(or even TO, for that matter), he would have been the greatest ever. He is still one of the greats, but he could have been the G.O.A.T.