What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

HB Blades story (1 Viewer)

bcr8f

Footballguy
If the season started today he'd start at SAM...I'm surprised they didn't go harder after Angelo Crowell...

Position Battle: Strong-Side LB

If camp opened today, this would be a battle between Alfred Fincher and H.B. Blades, two guys who are the favorites although neither is ideally constructed for the role.

Blades and Fincher come in with limited starting experience in this system, though both have proven their worth on special teams. Both have strong tackling instincts as well as distinct limitations. Blades was a late-round pick in large part because of his size; the Skins hoped he could learn from London Fletcher (another smaller middle linebacker), contribute on teams and play in the league for a long time. Expecting him to start at strong-side LB in the rugged NFC East - as run-heavy a division as there is - was never really the idea.

Having Blades play out in space, with a suspect group of left ends in front of him, is dangerous. His size isn't as much of an issue on the inside, especially with the potential for big tackles Albert Haynesworth and Cornelius Griffin to be eating up space in front of him. But with no certain prospect on the roster to replace Marcus Washington on the strong side, Blades may have to try to fit.

It's hard to imagine Blades being able to do anything to defend against big tight ends, and match-up problems could be plenty. Fincher's role in pass coverage would be sketchy as well. Fincher certainly plays mean, hits hard and has great enthusiasm - all of which serves him well - but he also plays a little out of control at times and taking 65 snaps a game at this position in this system could be a big problem.

Neither of these guys is a proven commodity and with either in the lineup, behind say Renaldo Wynn, I would anticipate opponents going right at this side of the defense.

The wild card could be getting Washington to come back for a veteran-minimum deal, but other players have told me that he was hurt by his release and is not interested in coming back. Some think he'd retire rather than come back here on a one-year try-out deal.

And, with some value at linebacker in this draft, maybe the team will use the 13th pick there. I continue to believe they should get a top tackle if one is available at that spot, but linebackers, like the USC contingent, are sure to be on the board then. I think that's a little high for them, but Pete Carroll's word carries a lot of weight here.

 
If the season started today he'd start at SAM...I'm surprised they didn't go harder after Angelo Crowell...
They didn't have very much money to spend in FA (relatively), and what they did have they used to address far bigger needs.Here's the link for the posted story.

LaCanfora sure makes it seem like Blades and Fincher are complete questionmarks at SLB. But the fact of the matter is, they both had PT there last season, including Blades starting 5 games at SLB. The video evidence, on what they can (or can't) do at SLB in the 'Skins system, is there so I'm not sure why JLC wouldn't bother watching it and coming to a conclusion, as opposed to simply posting that he thinks "Blades may have to try to fit".

IMO, having Blades play SLB isn't the ideal situation, but it's also not the liability that LaCanfora portrays it to be.

For example, JLC says:

It's hard to imagine Blades being able to do anything to defend against big tight ends, and match-up problems could be plenty.
Last year, in the second matchup between the 'Skins and Cowboys, Marcus Washington left the game with an injury in the first half and Blades filled in the rest of the game. Jason Witten was only 2/34 (he went 7/90/1 in the first matchup) that game, so I don't think you can simply conclude that big TEs will give the defense fits just because Blades is playing SLB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a piece on Blades from redskins.com. Nothing too earth-shattering in there, which is probably to be expected from a story by the team about the team. Basically, Blades is the front runner at the SLB position, given the current roster, because he has the most experience.

The article does restate that Chris Wilson is now in the mix at the position, but I think that's mostly a "let's see what else we can get out of this roster" move right now. Matt Terl had a blog post about this last week when Greg Blache mentioned it at a speaking gig.

...Blache mentioned that the team was looking at Wilson to potentially help fill the role of strongside linebacker.

"Yeah," Wilson told me, "I'm pretty excited for that. I've played the position before, and it's all stuff that I can do."

Wilson, at 6-4, 246, is similar in size to 6-3, 248 pound Marcus Washington, who played the strongside position last year, so it makes some kind of sense, and he's also known for his speed as a lineman. It's still an experiment at this point, barely more than an idea, but it at least offers a solid glimpse at the team's plans as the 2009 season gets closer.
 
Zorn said yesterday that the team would try McIntosh at the Sam, which suggests that Blades, Jones, Wilson and Orakpo would battle for time/rotate at the Will. The diminutive Blades (think London Fletcher II) in particular is far better suited for weak side duty.

This is definitely something to watch as the Will generates some pretty decent numbers in this defense, and that was before they added Haynesworth. If Blades, for example became the starter there his value would increase greatly.

Orakpo's versatility and the potential to use him as a hybrid DE/OLB will be a big wild card and may limit opportunities for one of the OLB's (probably NOT McIntosh) to be a three-down LB, however.

 
For a team that couldn't wait to get the card with Orakpo's name on it, they sure don't seem like they know how they want to use him. Orakpo says he's been told he'll be used at SAM on early downs and now Zorn says/suggests otherwise. And the beat writers weren't in agreement yesterday either. Hopefully minicamps will be more straightforward.

 
For a team that couldn't wait to get the card with Orakpo's name on it, they sure don't seem like they know how they want to use him. Orakpo says he's been told he'll be used at SAM on early downs and now Zorn says/suggests otherwise. And the beat writers weren't in agreement yesterday either. Hopefully minicamps will be more straightforward.
I think they're going to experiment with him. Making him a full-fledged hybrid in the Suggs mold (which is what I presume they're toying with) would represent a pretty big departure for Blache who has run a pretty conventional 4-3 up to this point.Edit to add: I think they viewed him as such a good prospect that they simply wanted him and would figure out how to use him later. Plus, with Haynesworth, they have more options as to how to attack the offense up front, which is a luxury that they just didn't have last year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any updates on Blades? I'm trying to figure out if I can dump him at this point, or if he'll have some value.

 
Any updates on Blades? I'm trying to figure out if I can dump him at this point, or if he'll have some value.
Seems locked in at backup MLB right now. With Orakpo and Chris Wilson seeing snaps at SLB, I don't think that's in his future any longer. Not enough information yet to know whether he'll continue to see some rotational nickel snaps again. I think he's still in a holding pattern awaiting an injury to Fletcher or McIntosh.
 
Blades is worthless in '09 without an injury unless he somehow beats out Rocky which I doubt.

But as far as I know he's the main backup at MLB and WLB. With Fletcher basically bulletproof but also quite old you never know. And since Rocky has a pretty big injury history with those knees I don't think Blades is a bad bet to stash on your bench and hope for an injury assuming you're in a pretty deep league. I don't know that he's the future, but I like the thought of keeping him in dynasties and hoping he's the guy who ultimately takes over for Fletcher. It's a long shot, but he looks like the most likely guy on roster right now and it's not like he costs a lot.

 
London Fletcher's longevity and durability are big obstacles for Blades. I'm not sure he's worth holding anymore. I think you can grab him off the waiver wire if you need to later in the year.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top