Black Sunday
Footballguy
They did a darn good job of it, imo. Can't wait til next week!!!
I agree with this. The sets look right. The characters seem right.They did a darn good job of it, imo. Can't wait til next week!!!
I would skip watching the show and just read the books. I think it would be a better experience for you.'Time Kibitzer said:I see this series being talked about all over the interwebs. Is it worth watching if I haven't read any of the books or is reading the books pretty well a requirement to enjoy the HBO series?
That's a pretty big undertaking, but for the here and now, you have:House StarkEddard (Ned)CatelynRob - Heir to House Stark - around 16Sansa - 13Arya - like 9 or 10Bran - 7 or 8Ricken - 3Jon Snow- ******* son of Ned - around 16BaratheonRobert - KingCersei - QueenJoffrey - son & heirthere's some other siblings in here, but these are the primariesLannisterTywinCercei - QueenJaime - Heir to House LannisterTyrion - "the Imp"TargaryenViserys - Current seat of House Targaryen, exiled heir to the Iron ThroneDaenarys - SisterStick with that for now.. there's a lot more, and if you want to dig deeper, check it out on Wikipedia, but beware of spoilers. There are probably some doozies if you aren't careful.I suggest reading the books, at least so you can know the full backstory and so you can join in much of the inevitable spoiler-filled conversation without unpleasant surprises.Can I get a breakdown of who is who kingdom-wise and relationship-wise fron those of you who read the book(s)? I liked this episode but just want to make sure I'm followIng properly.
There's gonna be a lot of incest on this show isn't there?
From the books the Targaryen family practiced it to keep their royal blood pure. In the rest of Westeros it is taboo which is one reason Brann gets tossed. Being it was the queen might have something to do with it too!Ok was starting to like the show but what is with all the incest?
This is a pretty good job. You will want to eventually read the books, but if you don't want the spoilers while the series is running I have another suggestion. The back of the first book had a breakdown of the different houses involved and their primary players. You could get the book and just read that part.That's a pretty big undertaking, but for the here and now, you have:House StarkEddard (Ned)CatelynRob - Heir to House Stark - around 16Sansa - 13Arya - like 9 or 10Bran - 7 or 8Ricken - 3Jon Snow- ******* son of Ned - around 16BaratheonRobert - KingCersei - QueenJoffrey - son & heirthere's some other siblings in here, but these are the primariesLannisterTywinCercei - QueenJaime - Heir to House LannisterTyrion - "the Imp"TargaryenViserys - Current seat of House Targaryen, exiled heir to the Iron ThroneDaenarys - SisterStick with that for now.. there's a lot more, and if you want to dig deeper, check it out on Wikipedia, but beware of spoilers. There are probably some doozies if you aren't careful.I suggest reading the books, at least so you can know the full backstory and so you can join in much of the inevitable spoiler-filled conversation without unpleasant surprises.Can I get a breakdown of who is who kingdom-wise and relationship-wise fron those of you who read the book(s)? I liked this episode but just want to make sure I'm followIng properly.
They aged everyone up a bit (eg:Rickon is older than 3 here) and set Robert's Rebellion/War of the Ursurper 17 years ago instead of 14. In this war Robert (Mark Addy)won the Throne by defeating the last Targaryen King(they ruled for 285 years or so and united the Seven Kingdoms into one realm) This king was Viserys and Daenaryes father (whom Jaime Lannister assassinated). Ned, Jon Arryn and Hoster Tully led armies with Robert.Jaime is not the heir because he took an oath for the King's Guard.That's a pretty big undertaking, but for the here and now, you have:House StarkEddard (Ned)CatelynRob - Heir to House Stark - around 16Sansa - 13Arya - like 9 or 10Bran - 7 or 8Ricken - 3Jon Snow- ******* son of Ned - around 16BaratheonRobert - KingCersei - QueenJoffrey - son & heirthere's some other siblings in here, but these are the primariesLannisterTywinCercei - QueenJaime - Heir to House LannisterTyrion - "the Imp"TargaryenViserys - Current seat of House Targaryen, exiled heir to the Iron ThroneDaenarys - SisterStick with that for now.. there's a lot more, and if you want to dig deeper, check it out on Wikipedia, but beware of spoilers. There are probably some doozies if you aren't careful.I suggest reading the books, at least so you can know the full backstory and so you can join in much of the inevitable spoiler-filled conversation without unpleasant surprises.Can I get a breakdown of who is who kingdom-wise and relationship-wise fron those of you who read the book(s)? I liked this episode but just want to make sure I'm followIng properly.
To be honest, I'd just use the wiki page. The cast is gigantic.Can I get a breakdown of who is who kingdom-wise and relationship-wise fron those of you who read the book(s)? I liked this episode but just want to make sure I'm followIng properly.
Here's another list taken from this site:Below is a list of characters-- great and small-- that have appeared thus far in the first season of HBO's Game of Thrones.This is a pretty good job. You will want to eventually read the books, but if you don't want the spoilers while the series is running I have another suggestion. The back of the first book had a breakdown of the different houses involved and their primary players. You could get the book and just read that part.That's a pretty big undertaking, but for the here and now, you have:House StarkCan I get a breakdown of who is who kingdom-wise and relationship-wise fron those of you who read the book(s)? I liked this episode but just want to make sure I'm followIng properly.
Eddard (Ned)
Catelyn
Rob - Heir to House Stark - around 16
Sansa - 13
Arya - like 9 or 10
Bran - 7 or 8
Ricken - 3
Jon Snow- ******* son of Ned - around 16
Baratheon
Robert - King
Cersei - Queen
Joffrey - son & heir
there's some other siblings in here, but these are the primaries
Lannister
Tywin
Cercei - Queen
Jaime - Heir to House Lannister
Tyrion - "the Imp"
Targaryen
Viserys - Current seat of House Targaryen, exiled heir to the Iron Throne
Daenarys - Sister
Stick with that for now.. there's a lot more, and if you want to dig deeper, check it out on Wikipedia, but beware of spoilers. There are probably some doozies if you aren't careful.
I suggest reading the books, at least so you can know the full backstory and so you can join in much of the inevitable spoiler-filled conversation without unpleasant surprises.
Pretty common throughout history, actually. I wouldn't worry too much about it, it is more a theme moving forward than something that will be thrown in your face all the time. Obviously the final scene was driven by an incestuous affair that was discovered and that scene is a big part of what sets the plot for the series.Ok was starting to like the show but what is with all the incest?
1. Yep2. Do you really mean Tyrion (the dwarf?) or someone else? Almost sounds like you mean Jaime (the knight who was banging his sister at the end, then pushed the kid). If so, the answer is "sorta". They weren't rivals, but they didn't like each other (I think this'll be explained more in future episodes). They ended up allied against the Targaryens (also probably to be explained in more depth later on).1. So the mentor of Neds and the (former) Hand of the King (Aryn maybe?)....who died but we find out later was murdered....was married to Ned's sister-in-law...who sent the note at the end?2. Is Tyrion an old rival of Neds...but fought with him to overthrow the Targaryens?
Yep...meant Jaime. I'm guessing reading the Wiki background that leads up to the novels is a good idea...doubt they backtrack to that history?1. Yep2. Do you really mean Tyrion (the dwarf?) or someone else? Almost sounds like you mean Jaime (the knight who was banging his sister at the end, then pushed the kid). If so, the answer is "sorta". They weren't rivals, but they didn't like each other (I think this'll be explained more in future episodes). They ended up allied against the Targaryens (also probably to be explained in more depth later on).1. So the mentor of Neds and the (former) Hand of the King (Aryn maybe?)....who died but we find out later was murdered....was married to Ned's sister-in-law...who sent the note at the end?2. Is Tyrion an old rival of Neds...but fought with him to overthrow the Targaryens?
Oh, there's plenty of history out there but the problem is that you also run across a lot of apoliers. Plus, one of the cool things about the books is how Martin gives you bits and pieces of info (including his characters' pasts) a little at a time. Perceptions change as he does that. There's an obvious example that they sort of skimmed over last night; I'm wondering how they're going to introduce this since it's so central to a lot of plot threads.Yep...meant Jaime. I'm guessing reading the Wiki background that leads up to the novels is a good idea...doubt they backtrack to that history?1. Yep2. Do you really mean Tyrion (the dwarf?) or someone else? Almost sounds like you mean Jaime (the knight who was banging his sister at the end, then pushed the kid). If so, the answer is "sorta". They weren't rivals, but they didn't like each other (I think this'll be explained more in future episodes). They ended up allied against the Targaryens (also probably to be explained in more depth later on).1. So the mentor of Neds and the (former) Hand of the King (Aryn maybe?)....who died but we find out later was murdered....was married to Ned's sister-in-law...who sent the note at the end?2. Is Tyrion an old rival of Neds...but fought with him to overthrow the Targaryens?
I know with Comcast you can get three free months of HBO and I don't think there is a commitment past that. I suggest calling them to see what offers they have.Any place to watch this online without getting HBO? Or am I going to have to splurge?
Very helpful actually.'Uruk-Hai said:Here is a tongue-in-cheek but still-informative recap of last night's episode that may clear up some confusion for those who haven't read the books. Obviously, there are spoilers for last night's show itself, but none for upcoming episodes.
Here's HBO's viewer guide. Link goes to an interactive map. Upper right corner has a link for its guide to houses. Once in the guide to houses arewa, there's also an appendix that has some basic background info (how Robert became king, why he rebelled, etc..).Very helpful actually.'Uruk-Hai said:Here is a tongue-in-cheek but still-informative recap of last night's episode that may clear up some confusion for those who haven't read the books. Obviously, there are spoilers for last night's show itself, but none for upcoming episodes.
I found myself doing the same thing.I find myself watching and listening to the characters, all the while thinking, he's gonna die, she's gonna get taken like a dog.
It's pretty awesome actually, especially the picture at the end of Luke and Leia about to kiss with the caption "It's never ok!".Very helpful actually.'Uruk-Hai said:Here is a tongue-in-cheek but still-informative recap of last night's episode that may clear up some confusion for those who haven't read the books. Obviously, there are spoilers for last night's show itself, but none for upcoming episodes.
I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television. FWIW, I'm on the fence on the first show. I think some of the material comes off a bit clunky and the exposition is a bit leaden, but I thought that about the book too. I enjoyed the first two books (am currently reading the third), but I do think there are some narrative problems that will spill over into the show (I think it's a mistake to begin the entire series with the White Walkers, for instance, in the book and in the show). I also found the "problematic" sexual themes protrayed in the most prurient and adolescent manner possible in the show. I actually give Martin credit for making those themes more complex in the books.Right now, the series is looking like a more narratively complex The Tudors/Rome (2nd Season). Which puts it squarely in the guilty pleasure category for me.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.
It's not that you have to read the book in order to enjoy the show. That's not it at all. I'm sure the show will be enjoyable without ever having read the books, but the entertainment value of the show is much much greater having read the books, imo. You may disagree, but I find knowing the characters in my head, and seeing them accurately portrayed (so far, so good) on screen is immensely entertaining. But to each his own.. if someone doesn't read, or if they don't want to invest the energy, so be it. I'm sure the HBO series will kick ### just the same.I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television. FWIW, I'm on the fence on the first show. I think some of the material comes off a bit clunky and the exposition is a bit leaden, but I thought that about the book too. I enjoyed the first two books (am currently reading the third), but I do think there are some narrative problems that will spill over into the show (I think it's a mistake to begin the entire series with the White Walkers, for instance, in the book and in the show). I also found the "problematic" sexual themes protrayed in the most prurient and adolescent manner possible in the show. I actually give Martin credit for making those themes more complex in the books.Right now, the series is looking like a more narratively complex The Tudors/Rome (2nd Season). Which puts it squarely in the guilty pleasure category for me.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.
It may depend on the particular offers available at your location. I tried to get free HBO for a couple of months and the best they would offer was $10 per month for 6 months.'Mjolnirs said:I know with Comcast you can get three free months of HBO and I don't think there is a commitment past that. I suggest calling them to see what offers they have.'Regular Crust Pizza said:Any place to watch this online without getting HBO? Or am I going to have to splurge?
When I called about the cost of HBO they informed me about 3 free months. At the same I was having some service issues and they made it 6 free months! How could I say no?It may depend on the particular offers available at your location. I tried to get free HBO for a couple of months and the best they would offer was $10 per month for 6 months.'Mjolnirs said:I know with Comcast you can get three free months of HBO and I don't think there is a commitment past that. I suggest calling them to see what offers they have.'Regular Crust Pizza said:Any place to watch this online without getting HBO? Or am I going to have to splurge?
I don't think that's what's being said. I personally think people should read these books first because I think they would enjoy them a lot more. I couldn't imagine reading these books after watching the series.I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.
I don't think that's what's being said. I personally think people should read these books first because I think they would enjoy them a lot more. I couldn't imagine reading these books after watching the series.I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.
I enjoyed the first show, but these books are some of the best Fantasy books on the market. It would be a shame to have to read them after being prejudiced by the series, no matter how good it is.Prejudiced and hit with massive spoilers. Definitely recommend the books first just for the excitement of discovery before the good but nowhere near as awesome as the source TV show ruins the surprises.That said, since I am still re-reading book 3, I'm having mind warp issues as the characters as I've pictured them are warring with the visuals from the show in my head. Like Tyrion and Sansa for instance. I always pictured Sansa looking like the weird princess from Neverending Story but now she's a super cute and most likely soon to be super hot redhead, and Tyrion I always pictured like the dwarf in Don't Look Now. Both of these characters' images keep morphing in my head like the suits from A Scanner Darkly. Kind of weird. I hope one image takes final control before the 5th book comes out (if it actually does now that season 2 is greenlit).I don't think that's what's being said. I personally think people should read these books first because I think they would enjoy them a lot more. I couldn't imagine reading these books after watching the series.I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.I enjoyed the first show, but these books are some of the best Fantasy books on the market. It would be a shame to have to read them after being prejudiced by the series, no matter how good it is.
You have a lot of fancy words in there.I don't get this at all. Listen, if the show requires people to have read the books in order to make sense of it, it will have failed as television. FWIW, I'm on the fence on the first show. I think some of the material comes off a bit clunky and the exposition is a bit leaden, but I thought that about the book too. I enjoyed the first two books (am currently reading the third), but I do think there are some narrative problems that will spill over into the show (I think it's a mistake to begin the entire series with the White Walkers, for instance, in the book and in the show). I also found the "problematic" sexual themes protrayed in the most prurient and adolescent manner possible in the show. I actually give Martin credit for making those themes more complex in the books.Right now, the series is looking like a more narratively complex The Tudors/Rome (2nd Season). Which puts it squarely in the guilty pleasure category for me.'Black Sunday said:For those that have not, you really really need to read the book first. You won't regret it.Just do it. You can have it done in a week, if you stay on it. If not, then TIVO next week's episode.
Plus the dialogue in the books is fantastic. So is the first person POV. You get a lot more into the feelings of the characters. Such as Snow's rocky relationship with Cat. I really can't beleive they sliced Tyrion's line about "all dwarves are bastards, but not all bastards need be dwarves." That line really solidified Tyrion as a friend and comrade of Jon's.