They're equal. A tie is half win, half loss, so Team B essentially has a 6-7 record.Who has the better record? I say team B since they haven't lost as many games.Team A 6 wins - 7 lossesTeam B 5 wins - 6 losses - 2 ties
I'm interested in hearing your logic for this conclusion.Team A. that was easy.
Actually, your math is off.Team A won 6 of 13, 45.15%Team B won 5 of 13, 38.46%.But of course, that doesn't matter unless your league stipulates that a tie counts as a double loss.thehornet said:winning percentagesTeam A : 46.15Team B : 45.45Team A Wins.
ya forgot about the ties. corrected percentages would put both teams at 46.15. gotta go head to head to figure out winnerActually, your math is off.Team A won 6 of 13, 45.15%Team B won 5 of 13, 38.46%.But of course, that doesn't matter unless your league stipulates that a tie counts as a double loss.thehornet said:winning percentagesTeam A : 46.15Team B : 45.45Team A Wins.
Agreed. Team B won 5 +0.5 + 0.5 = 6 total.ya forgot about the ties. corrected percentages would put both teams at 46.15. gotta go head to head to figure out winnerActually, your math is off.Team A won 6 of 13, 45.15%Team B won 5 of 13, 38.46%.But of course, that doesn't matter unless your league stipulates that a tie counts as a double loss.thehornet said:winning percentagesTeam A : 46.15Team B : 45.45Team A Wins.
Actually there is chance that these two plus another could go it is so tight. Next game will decide which of the three go.Neither should make the playoffs so it should not matter.
There doesn't have to be anything in the rule book for that. I thought everyone knew how ties are calcuated. The records are identical. Common math sense says so.My opinion is most wins is better record, but its really up to the definition in the rule books. If there's not one, that Commish is in trouble.
But wouldn't more losses be a worse record?Gotta count ties as 1/2 win, 1/2 loss. Records are the same, go to next tie-breaker.My opinion is most wins is better record,
And they are right. Both teams are one game below .500. These two teams are tied. It is that way in the NFL, NBA and MLB. No pro sport in this country would send either team anywhere without a tie breaker being utilized.Most people say they are equal.
100% wrong.Team A, More wins
100% wrong.Team A, More wins
FF is all about scoring more points than your opponent to earn the win ... agreed? If you don't put more weight behind actual wins than "half wins", you're basically punishing Team A for not getting more "half wins" .. whatever that means.in the "real world", a tie is a half a win/loss. but in FF, a tie is a no win/no loss ... that's why they call it a "tie".They're equal. A tie is half win, half loss, so Team B essentially has a 6-7 record.Who has the better record? I say team B since they haven't lost as many games.Team A 6 wins - 7 lossesTeam B 5 wins - 6 losses - 2 ties
Roll your eyes all you want. You are still 100% wrong.Sheriff66 said:Loke said:100% wrong.Sheriff66 said:Team A, More wins![]()
So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
But Team A has scored less than his opponent more times than Team B. Why are you punishing Team B for losing less often?It is a "glass half empty/half full" argument. The two records are equal -- go to the next tie-breaker.burd said:FF is all about scoring more points than your opponent to earn the win ... agreed? If you don't put more weight behind actual wins than "half wins", you're basically punishing Team A for not getting more "half wins" .. whatever that means.in the "real world", a tie is a half a win/loss. but in FF, a tie is a no win/no loss ... that's why they call it a "tie".They're equal. A tie is half win, half loss, so Team B essentially has a 6-7 record.Who has the better record? I say team B since they haven't lost as many games.Team A 6 wins - 7 lossesTeam B 5 wins - 6 losses - 2 ties
I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. 6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%Ties do not factor into winning percentage. You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
No, you don't. If you look at the standings and Team A is 80-60 and Team B is 79-59, Team B is ZERO games behind Team A. i.e. they are tied in the standings.You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.
What do your rules say?If you dont have a rule for this, then you should default to the NFL standard. That means its a tie because a tie is 1/2 win and 1/2 loss. Fix your rules in the offseason so this isnt a question.If you do have a rule for this, why are you posting here?Frankly, all the opinions in this thread are worthless. The NFL is very clear about how they handle ties. Unless you want to change their standards you should generally default to what the NFL does.Who has the better record? I say team B since they haven't lost as many games.Team A 6 wins - 7 lossesTeam B 5 wins - 6 losses - 2 ties
Why would you not use the clearly defined rules of the sport?? I can see over-riding those rules if the league wants too. But in this case, the rule is clear and specific in every sport out there. It's like having to spell out the fact that the team with the most points wins. It just doesn't pass any sort of logic test.The mere fact that there ARE opinions on both sides, presents an opportunity to clear it up in the rules. There can be NO room for interpretation "Mr. 100% wrong guy" in Fantasy Football, if it's not in the rules, it's broke.
The teams are tied. The owners will have to settle this in the octagon.
It depends on how you calculate it. team A won 6 of 13 games = 46%. Team B won 5 of 13 games= 38.5 %.your calculating 5 of 11 for team B, why?I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. 6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%Ties do not factor into winning percentage. You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
Team A lost 7 of 13 (54%). Team B lost 6 of 13 (46%). In other words I dont know why everyone's just focusing on the wins when a loss is the opposite of a win. Why say having more wins is more important? So by saying a team with more wins is better you are also saying the team with more losses is better. Thats nonsense. Getting a win is equally good as getting a loss would be bad. ITS A TIEIt depends on how you calculate it. team A won 6 of 13 games = 46%. Team B won 5 of 13 games= 38.5 %.your calculating 5 of 11 for team B, why?I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. 6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%Ties do not factor into winning percentage. You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
Wow! I am amazed at how todays schools are failing in teaching basic math.Both teams have played 13 games.To get the "winning percentage" for ANY team - you do the following math:1. Divide wins by total games played (Team A (6/13) - 46.15%; Team B (5/13) - 38.5%)2. Divide non-losses by total games played (Team A (6/13) - 46.15%; Team B (7/13) - 53.8%)3. Add the two numbers together and divide by 2 (Team A - 46.15%; Team B 46.15%)This formula is the ONLY way to determine winning percentage. A 6-7 team is better than a 5-6 team, but in this case the team is not 5-6, but rather 5-6-2. You cannot simply ignore the two ties as if they do not exist, or that the team did not play those games.ETA: In keeping with the spirit of the day, have a fabulous and blessed day!!I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. ETA: In keeping within the spirit of the day - have a fabulous and blessed day.6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%Ties do not factor into winning percentage. You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
For you they don't. In all of professional sports they do.I believe that the standings are determined by winning percentage. Therefore, 1-7 is better than 0-0-8. This isnt hockey or soccer. If you havent won a game, you cant be better than a team that has. 6-7 equals winning percentage of 46.15%So by your "logic", a 1-7-0 record is better than 0-0-8, right?BLOX said:Most people say they are equal.
I believe that Wins are the most important in the entire equation, even more than losses.
This is why I believe that team A is the better team. Although I understand the arguement for them being equal, and I also understand that team A has more losses. Wins are bigger than losses though.
In my mind, Wins>Ties>Losses.
5-6 equals winning percentage of 45.45%
Ties do not factor into winning percentage.
You see this in baseball all the time where one team has played more games.
99.666% to be exact.Ned said:go to decimal scoring and this problem goes away 99% of the time.
Why can't we all agree that we must love each other first before we can debate the important issues of the day. Without love, we'd just be blindly yelling at each other! Spread the joy!
I don't think a schtick has ever grown old as quickly as this one...Why can't we all agree that we must love each other first before we can debate the important issues of the day. Without love, we'd just be blindly yelling at each other! Spread the joy!