What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Herm states that there will be about a 60/40 (1 Viewer)

The Jets weren't nearly talented enough to win 8 games last year without so many key players.

Lose a receiver here and there, fine. Maybe a back seven defensive player, OK. But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.

 
The Jets weren't nearly talented enough to win 8 games last year without so many key players.

Lose a receiver here and there, fine. Maybe a back seven defensive player, OK. But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.
There was no excuse for how the Jets came out for the Chiefs game last year. Terribly flat, and no injuries to complain about yet. The Jaguars game was another one that New York easily could have won -- they lost in OT.The Ravens game was another example of horrible Herm coaching. The Jets allowed only 13 points to Baltimore, but Edwards' conservative coaching gave the Jets no chance to win that one.

The Chargers game was lost in the final minute of play. The Jets had the ball down by less than a TD inside the San Diego 10, but poor playcalling did them in.

The Saints beat the Jets by two points. The Jets had 1st and 10 on the Saints 36 with just over a minute to go.

The Jets had 2nd and 3 at the Miami 15 with 5:26 to go, down by a touchdown. Another very winnable game.

And even the Falcons game, while it was a blowout, the Jets had a chance to win at the end. They had 1st and 10 at the Atlanta 20 yardline down 13 with over 4:00 to go, and the Falcons had been shut down on offense most of the second half.

The Jets went 4-12, but they certainly had the ability to go 8-8. Part of that IMO was due to bad coaching. I don't imagine you watched every Jets game last year, but if you did, I think you'd change your tune on how good of a coach he was.

 
But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.
Blanket statements like this are never accurate. You should watch some film of the 2004 Steelers or the 2005 Bears.
 
But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.
Blanket statements like this are never accurate. You should watch some film of the 2004 Steelers or the 2005 Bears.
How many games exactly did Ben Roethlisberger start/miss in 2004?And how many quarterbacks did the Bears lose exactly? By my count, they lost one, and eventually got him BACK.

That's not losing multiple quarterbacks.

 
I don't imagine you watched every Jets game last year, but if you did, I think you'd change your tune on how good of a coach he was.
I haven't said he's all that good. I've merely stated that he's better than most people (or, more accurately, fans, because he gets respect among NFL people) give him credit for. I also think he has a good shot at being better than #### Vermeil was for the Chiefs. You know, zero playoff wins in one playoff appearance doesn't cut it with me.

 
But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.
Blanket statements like this are never accurate. You should watch some film of the 2004 Steelers or the 2005 Bears.
How many games exactly did Ben Roethlisberger start/miss in 2004?And how many quarterbacks did the Bears lose exactly? By my count, they lost one, and eventually got him BACK.

That's not losing multiple quarterbacks.
Eagles 2002
 
But you simply don't lose quarterbacks (yes, plural) and expect to be competitive.
Blanket statements like this are never accurate. You should watch some film of the 2004 Steelers or the 2005 Bears.
How many games exactly did Ben Roethlisberger start/miss in 2004?And how many quarterbacks did the Bears lose exactly? By my count, they lost one, and eventually got him BACK.

That's not losing multiple quarterbacks.
You probably don't remember this, but both rookie QBs were expected to be third stringers ala Brooks Bollinger.
 
I don't imagine you watched every Jets game last year, but if you did, I think you'd change your tune on how good of a coach he was.
I haven't said he's all that good. I've merely stated that he's better than most people (or, more accurately, fans, because he gets respect among NFL people) give him credit for. I also think he has a good shot at being better than #### Vermeil was for the Chiefs. You know, zero playoff wins in one playoff appearance doesn't cut it with me.
I don't think Herm has the Football knowledge Vermiel has in his Pinky.To me, KC was the best and possibly only place Herm could succeed given the Offense already established and defense on it's way - at least the systems were established....

Besides On Field, Game day decisions, that were an absolute joke. The next biggest Herm failure was picking and installing systems on both sides of the ball, he had zero experience as a coordinator and I think the little he knew about Defense made him do some irrational things like make a 3-4 coach install some kind of Tampa Hybrid... They made it up as they went.

KC has a lot of talent. If they stay healthy, they should make the playoffs... KC fans better hope the difference isn't HC decisions, this guy won't out coach or gameplan the top HC's in this league.

My opinion, of course........

Now Mangini is the new Jets HC - He's Also inexperienced but, at least has 1 year as a DC... I'm not going to try to defend the OBVIOUS questions about Mangini. Wait and see - that is all.

If I were a KC fan, who hasn't seen much of Herm, I'd Hold my breath for a while and take the same wait and see approach. Let the Obvious questions be and hope for a MUCH improved Herm and hopefully not too many big Game day decisions instead of pretending theres some wave of Herm Proponents in the NFL... The Guy is the nicest guy around and has the biggest heart in the world OF COURSE he has friends in high places - You don't become a HC in the NFL with no experience without friends...... But, let's not pretend there's some wave of peopel who think he's a Great X's and O's guy.

I think Herm would make the perfect College or HS coach where he can really make a difference in people's lives like he say's is so important.

 
I agree, Herm would make a great NCAA coach. He's a less intelligent but more charismatic Pete Carroll.

The biggest dissapointment for me was that Herm never improved. His mistakes in 2001 were chalked up to his inexperience. Unfortunately, they never went away.

And as I've said multiple times now, still no one talks about how he chose to kickoff to start both halves in a game the Jets barely lost and nearly cost them a playoff berth.

 
I don't think Herm has the Football knowledge Vermiel has in his Pinky.
I could care less if he doesn't have any football knowledge, so long as he gets better results than Vermeil did.As stated, that wouldn't be difficult. If and when that day comes, I'm going to care even less about how 'smart' Edwards is.

Vermeil has set the bar low, and until Edwards -- or any other coach in Kansas City -- raises it to what it should be, I'm going to have lower expectations. For now, I'll be content with something "genius" Vermeil couldn't accomplish - a playoff win.

 
I don't imagine you watched every Jets game last year, but if you did, I think you'd change your tune on how good of a coach he was.
I haven't said he's all that good. I've merely stated that he's better than most people (or, more accurately, Jets fans, because he gets respect among NFL people) give him credit for. I also think he has a good shot at being better than #### Vermeil was for the Chiefs. You know, zero playoff wins in one playoff appearance doesn't cut it with me.
Fixed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You probably don't remember this, but both rookie QBs were expected to be third stringers ala Brooks Bollinger.
But they weren't.The fact remains that the Jets lost their #1 and #2 quarterback to injury. Neither the Steelers in 2004 or Bears in 2005 can stake the claim to going through that experience, which is much tougher than anything they did go through.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You probably don't remember this, but both rookie QBs were expected to be third stringers ala Brooks Bollinger.
But they weren't.The fact remains that the Jets lost their #1 and #2 quarterback to injury. Neither the Steelers in 2004 or Bears in 2005 can stake the claim to going through that experience, which is much tougher than anything they did go through.
Huh?
 
Eagles 2002
Was Detmer injured or was he selectively replaced? I don't remember.If he was injured, then that's one example, and even then, it's frail. McNabb lead the team to 7 wins and 11 weeks of the season had already been played.

It's a little different when, as in the Jets' case, the quarterbacks are down within a few weeks of the season starting.

Even if we classed them as the same thing, that's still only one example on what I believe would be a short list.

 
From all that I have read during Herm's head coaching tenure, he has a very bad rap from all fans, not just Jets fans.
The best indicator is usually Fans from other teams in the same division....I don't think there are many, if any, Fans from Buffalo, Miami or NE that were happy to see Herm go.....

 
I agree, Herm would make a great NCAA coach. He's a less intelligent but more charismatic Pete Carroll.
:lmao: not being sarcastic - I just found this funny.
It's simplistic, of course, but it's pretty much how I feel. Carroll was a very good DC for the Jets. He also was a good HC, but I really think the fake spike doomed him in. If that game goes differently, the Jets would have been the favorite to win the division that year. As it was, he was done after that.Carroll won 27 games in three years in NE. The three prior years Parcells won 27 games; the following three years Belichick won 25.

Obviously Carroll's success at USC has been well documented.

Herm doesn't have the strategic ability of Carroll, but he's really a master motivator. He might be the best in the league. And he's a perfect fit for the college game since he's very into getting to know the players and I'd imagine he'd be an excellent recruiter. Put pom-poms in his hands and he'd be a great cheerleader. ;)

 
Eagles 2002
Was Detmer injured or was he selectively replaced? I don't remember.If he was injured, then that's one example, and even then, it's frail. McNabb lead the team to 7 wins and 11 weeks of the season had already been played.

It's a little different when, as in the Jets' case, the quarterbacks are down within a few weeks of the season starting.

Even if we classed them as the same thing, that's still only one example on what I believe would be a short list.
We still have two teams the last two seasons, both who managed to get byes in the playoffs. All I asked for Herm is to not quit on the team and give a run at 8 wins. He had a bad 2005. He had a good 2004. He's an average HC.
 
Eagles 2002
Was Detmer injured or was he selectively replaced? I don't remember.If he was injured, then that's one example, and even then, it's frail. McNabb lead the team to 7 wins and 11 weeks of the season had already been played.

It's a little different when, as in the Jets' case, the quarterbacks are down within a few weeks of the season starting.

Even if we classed them as the same thing, that's still only one example on what I believe would be a short list.
He had a bad 2005. He had a good 2004. He's an average HC.
I swear I am not trying to be combative. Would you say that about Andy Reid? He had a bad 05 and a great 04 and a good record over the last 4 or 5 years.

 
Eagles 2002
Was Detmer injured or was he selectively replaced? I don't remember.If he was injured, then that's one example, and even then, it's frail. McNabb lead the team to 7 wins and 11 weeks of the season had already been played.

It's a little different when, as in the Jets' case, the quarterbacks are down within a few weeks of the season starting.

Even if we classed them as the same thing, that's still only one example on what I believe would be a short list.
He had a bad 2005. He had a good 2004. He's an average HC.
Would you say that about Andy Reid? He had a bad 05 and a great 04 and a good record over the last 4 or 5 years.
I think Reid's a great HC. I didn't watch enough Eagles games to really comment on Reid's 2005 performance. Obviously the team didn't do well. Reid has 54 wins the last five seasons; Edwards has 39. It's not always that cut and dry, but an average of three more wins per season means Reid gets a bit more slack than Herm. Reid also is know as a brilliant offensive mind; Herm doesn't have that reputation or resume.I'll let the Eagles fans chime in on how Reid did in 2005, but he would have had to really bomb to be considered an average HC in my mind.

 
Given the assertion Edwards wants 550 carries and a 60/40 split (did he in fact say that?), that would mean:

Johnson - 330 carries

Other - 220 carries

Some people (in this thread and others places I've read) are getting excited about the potential of those 220 carries, and I don't know why.

1) Given what I've seen from Edwards in the past, there's no way he'll avoid the temptation to use a weapon like Johnson, if healthy, a lot more than a 60/40 split. A 70/30 split of 550 carries would mean:

Johnson - 385 carries

Other - 165 carries

2) It is very difficult to attain 550 carries. On just three occasions in the last five years has any team had 550 carries (only the league leader each time). When looking at the KC carries below, keep in mind that in 2001-2005 Holmes/Johnson put up great stats. Team league leaders in carries generally have very strong team defenses, which KC has not had and can't be assumed to have in 2006.

The leaders the last 5 years were -

2005 - (1) Pit 549 (2) Den 542 (KC had 520)

2004 - (1) Pit 618 (2) Den 534 (KC had 496)

2003 - (1) Bal 553 (2) Den 543 (KC had 446)

2002 - (1) Mia 530 (2) Atl 523 (KC had 462)

2001 - (1) Pit 580 (2) SF 509 (KC had 448)

3) So, if I disregard both the 550 carries hyperbole and the 60/40 hyperbole, and go with something more realistic, here is what I get using a 70/30 split and last year's 520 carries (I think 520 is still high, but will use it for the sake of this discussion)

Johnson - 364 carries

Other - 156 carries

4) "Other - 156 carries" won't all go to one guy. Whether it's Holmes with an iffy neck or nobodies like Dee Brown or Q Griffin, I wouldn't expect the #2 RB to get much more than 100 carries, with the rest going to the #3, the FB, a few on reverses, the QB, etc.

Assuming 100 x 4.5 (probably generous) = 450 yards and maybe 2-3 TDs and a few catches, you're probably looking at <75 fantasy points from the KC #2 RB.

People trusting a 60/40 split of 550 carries, and hoping for 220 carries and 1100 total yards (as one poster above did) from Holmes or Dee Brown or any single #2 RB, should seriously re-evaluate expectations. The reason to roster the KC #2 RB is the chance he will start if Johnson gets hurt, not for fantasy points gained as a complement to Johnson. The #2 will not be startable in a fantasy lineup unless Johnson goes down.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eagles 2002
Was Detmer injured or was he selectively replaced? I don't remember.If he was injured, then that's one example, and even then, it's frail. McNabb lead the team to 7 wins and 11 weeks of the season had already been played.

It's a little different when, as in the Jets' case, the quarterbacks are down within a few weeks of the season starting.

Even if we classed them as the same thing, that's still only one example on what I believe would be a short list.
He had a bad 2005. He had a good 2004. He's an average HC.
Would you say that about Andy Reid? He had a bad 05 and a great 04 and a good record over the last 4 or 5 years.
I think Reid's a great HC. I didn't watch enough Eagles games to really comment on Reid's 2005 performance. Obviously the team didn't do well. Reid has 54 wins the last five seasons; Edwards has 39. It's not always that cut and dry, but an average of three more wins per season means Reid gets a bit more slack than Herm. Reid also is know as a brilliant offensive mind; Herm doesn't have that reputation or resume.I'll let the Eagles fans chime in on how Reid did in 2005, but he would have had to really bomb to be considered an average HC in my mind.
Hank Stram first 5 years:| 1960 dtx | 8 6 0 | 0 0 |

| 1961 dtx | 6 8 0 | 0 0 |

| 1962 dtx | 11 3 0 | 1 0 |

| 1963 kan | 5 7 2 | 0 0 |

| 1964 kan | 7 7 0 | 0 0 |

Total 37 31 1 1

Bill Belicheck first 5 years

1991 cle | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |

| 1992 cle | 7 9 0 | 0 0 |

| 1993 cle | 7 9 0 | 0 0 |

| 1994 cle | 11 5 0 | 1 1 |

| 1995 cle | 5 11 0 | 0 0

total 35 43 1 1

#### Vermiel

1976 phi | 4 10 0 | 0 0 |

| 1977 phi | 5 9 0 | 0 0 |

| 1978 phi | 9 7 0 | 0 1 |

| 1979 phi | 11 5 0 | 1 1 |

| 1980 phi | 12 4 0 | 2 1

Total 41 35 3 3

Bill Walsh

1979 sfo | 2 14 0 | 0 0 |

| 1980 sfo | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |

| 1981 sfo | 13 3 0 | 3 0 |

| 1982 sfo | 3 6 0 | 0 0 |

| 1983 sfo | 10 6 0 | 1 1

Total 34 39 4 1

Herm Edwards

2001 nyj | 10 6 0 | 0 1 |

| 2002 nyj | 9 7 0 | 1 1 |

| 2003 nyj | 6 10 0 | 0 0 |

| 2004 nyj | 10 6 0 | 1 1 |

| 2005 nyj | 4 12 0 | 0 0

Total 39 41 2 3

So is it possible that some head coaches in this lague may get better the longer they are in the league? Is it possible that coaches learn from thier mistakes as they continue in the league? Which of us were the people saying "How could you hire Belichick. He's was horrible in Cleveland"

Edited to add: On this list, only Herm and Vermiel took thier team to the playoffs 3 of the first 5 years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree, Herm would make a great NCAA coach. He's a less intelligent but more charismatic Pete Carroll.
:lmao: not being sarcastic - I just found this funny.
It's simplistic, of course, but it's pretty much how I feel. Carroll was a very good DC for the Jets. He also was a good HC, but I really think the fake spike doomed him in. If that game goes differently, the Jets would have been the favorite to win the division that year. As it was, he was done after that.Carroll won 27 games in three years in NE. The three prior years Parcells won 27 games; the following three years Belichick won 25.

Obviously Carroll's success at USC has been well documented.

Herm doesn't have the strategic ability of Carroll, but he's really a master motivator. He might be the best in the league. And he's a perfect fit for the college game since he's very into getting to know the players and I'd imagine he'd be an excellent recruiter. Put pom-poms in his hands and he'd be a great cheerleader. ;)
Carroll should never have been fired. I thought so then, I think so now. that dammed spike game. The Jets weren't fooled, at least the DB's weren't. They just got beat, period. If you look at that tape, it's obvious. That play would have worked, fake spike or not. that game was lost earlier, on that same drive, but spilt beans. Carroll got shafted. He was a good NFL coach. Herm? :lmao: this guy has no clue. He does get players motivated, but his strengths start and end right there. On the flip side, some vets don't like his preacher approach either. I post on a Chief's message board. I am not allowed to post about Edwards. Chiefs fans understandably want to see the glass hal full, but they know better, and realllllly don't want to hear what an idiot Edwards actually is. I understand that. If I were a Chiefs fan, I'd want to think Edwards won't screw up the offense, and will improve the D too. But.... he will screw up the offense, and get in Gunther's way, as he tries to make that defense playoff worthy.

You want to group people that think Edwards stinks as bitter Jets fans? Go ahead. In two years, there will be more company.... another million that will learn what a tool Hermie is as a HC.....and they will be Chiefs fans. :popcorn:

 
Edwards inheritted a line that had Curtis be the 2nd leading rusher in the NFL and Vinny had some superlow number like 5-10 sacks or somesuch. That was an excellent line and he(and the GM) messed with it. They also had Mawae who IMO is a future HOFer and probably better than any single Chiefs lineman though with Roaf it might be debatable to some.
"Debateable to some"? Mawae is not in Roaf's league, nor Will Shields in terms of career accomplishments.
Career, I think Mawae is better or debatable...not in their league I completely disagree with
 
I agree, Herm would make a great NCAA coach. He's a less intelligent but more charismatic Pete Carroll.
:lmao: not being sarcastic - I just found this funny.
It's simplistic, of course, but it's pretty much how I feel. Carroll was a very good DC for the Jets. He also was a good HC, but I really think the fake spike doomed him in. If that game goes differently, the Jets would have been the favorite to win the division that year. As it was, he was done after that.Carroll won 27 games in three years in NE. The three prior years Parcells won 27 games; the following three years Belichick won 25.

Obviously Carroll's success at USC has been well documented.

Herm doesn't have the strategic ability of Carroll, but he's really a master motivator. He might be the best in the league. And he's a perfect fit for the college game since he's very into getting to know the players and I'd imagine he'd be an excellent recruiter. Put pom-poms in his hands and he'd be a great cheerleader. ;)
Carroll should never have been fired. I thought so then, I think so now. that dammed spike game. The Jets weren't fooled, at least the DB's weren't. They just got beat, period. If you look at that tape, it's obvious. That play would have worked, fake spike or not. that game was lost earlier, on that same drive, but spilt beans. Carroll got shafted. He was a good NFL coach. Herm? :lmao: this guy has no clue. He does get players motivated, but his strengths start and end right there. On the flip side, some vets don't like his preacher approach either. I post on a Chief's message board. I am not allowed to post about Edwards. Chiefs fans understandably want to see the glass hal full, but they know better, and realllllly don't want to hear what an idiot Edwards actually is. I understand that. If I were a Chiefs fan, I'd want to think Edwards won't screw up the offense, and will improve the D too. But.... he will screw up the offense, and get in Gunther's way, as he tries to make that defense playoff worthy.

You want to group people that think Edwards stinks as bitter Jets fans? Go ahead. In two years, there will be more company.... another million that will learn what a tool Hermie is as a HC.....and they will be Chiefs fans. :popcorn:
what he said :thumbup: Herm is a tool.

He is a horrible game day coach,

especially when trying to manage the clock

when the game is on the line.

If you could give an award to a choking coach

in the last 2 minutes of a game, Herm would win hands down,

with Mike Martz as a close 2nd.

:tfp:

 
You probably don't remember this, but both rookie QBs were expected to be third stringers ala Brooks Bollinger.
But they weren't.The fact remains that the Jets lost their #1 and #2 quarterback to injury. Neither the Steelers in 2004 or Bears in 2005 can stake the claim to going through that experience, which is much tougher than anything they did go through.
Huh?
double ????
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top