Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
"innocent until proven guilty" is second only to "Freedom of Speech" as the most misued legal principal by the general public in discussions,Or... Lloyd had his own car from Aaron and he was out buying drugs for them. Deal goes sour drug dealer or someone kills him for the money, Aaron doesn't want evidence that he was sent out to buy drugs for the group with Aaron's money. But if that is the case he just made it a LOT harder to be proven innocent. There are a few scenario where I could see Hernandez being innocent. not gonna go on a tangent with them, just know there is still a small hope that he won't be guilty of murder, or even possibly obstruction. Don't say 100% chance he goes to jail, because that stat is 100% false! I would say until we know more there is no 100% way to be certain he shot the guy, and since he possibly destroyed the videos before they were searching him, it could possibly not hold up as obstruction... I am holding him on my dynasty holding onto that small grain of hope until I hear more... Would suck to have dropped him then have one of the goon friends confess the next day/week/month and have someone snatch him off of waivers before you can. Depending on roster size i can see how in some leagues it may be necessary to cut him, but in large roster leagues and, especially, in dynasty leagues... What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Is that not the way it works around here now?- A body shot in the back of the head and his car one mile from the crime scene.Since a person is dead and we only know of a warrant served on Hernandez's home, I'm gonna go with murder, accessory to murder, or something along those lines.
- His destroyed surveillance recording and phone as well as the hiring of a cleaning crew the morning after the murder.
- Video of men walking into his home between 3 and 3:30 am.
There's enough evidence for a 1st degree murder charge. I imagine the police have a lot more evidence that we don't know about yet.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal principal that applies only for the purposes of the criminal trial. It is a legal standard/assumption that the defendant is "innocent" in a criminal proceeding until the State proves "beyond a reasonable doubt" that he is guilty. The jury is instructed to assume the defendant is innocent - it is only a protection from a wrongful conviction - until proven otherwise.
It has nothing to do with the court of public opinion or a message board discussion or whether Hernandez is in fact actually innocent or guilty at the present time in reality.
It's fairly obvious based on what has been reported that Hernandez is heavily involved here. Any outlandish defenses being offered are not plausible. This of course doesn't mean he'll ultimately be found guilty of anything here - but it doesn't look good right now.