moleculo
Footballguy
who exactly is playing judge, jury, and executioner? Literally no one, so please stop with this. Actual due process will be carried out by legitimate judges and juries.THis is a big thread so maybe someone did say that. I haven't seen it.Because those people are so much more noble, hoping a potential murderer walks to help out their fantasy football teams.Is there such a crowd? Or are you confusing it with the "He did something, but hopefully he gets off" crowd?slow-clap for the "he didn't do anything and won't be charged" crowd![]()
I see it more as a case of there are still people in our country that are willing to not have to have instantaneous gratification on something and are willing to let due process of the law be unfurled so that the person who is innocent until proven guilty actually gets due legal process before we slam the gavel and play judge, jury, and executioner in what could literally be a man's fate.
Its very easy to be catty and toss something out there and make it sound as if the people are saying "hey, let's not send him to the chair this morning" are just being superficial and only making their statements based on the impact it has to a fantasy football team but it is also just as easy to say that the people wanting to announce his automatic guilt, based purely on speculation and based nothing on due process of the law is based on nothing more than the opposite biases of not liking the Patriots, feeling they have something to gain if someone else's player goes to jail, or just wanting to be the guy that says "look at me. Told you so". Sounds pretty bad the other way too, huh?
I hope neither scenario is the case but if they both are, I would rather be on the side saying "I hope you guys jumped the gun in convicting him and, after being given fair due process, we find out who the true guilty parties are and that he is not one of them" much more than being on the side saying "burn the witches and who cares if he is innocent."
The court of public opinion has absolutely no responsibility to assume innocence before guilt - in fact, it typically works the opposite. Concurrently, the court of public opinion has no teeth - it can impose absolutely no jail time, it can not levy any fines, it cannot impede on constitutional rights one iota. The only thing it can do is harm a public image, which leads to endorsements being dropped and force associates (employers, etc) to distance themselves from the accused.
At the same time, the court of public opinion reserves the absolute right to change it's mind as new evidence breaks. it's fickle like that.
Last edited by a moderator: