I appreciate the input, but I hope you can agree talent level can differ at all levels (Mite through Midget). My son has been playing with the same kids since he was 4, in a Devo system as well as cross-ice model and eventually onto full ice. They have been working on skating skills for some time now and continue to work on skating skills every practice and during games. Coaches push this by sending videos showing the importance of edge work, they send videos of professionals practicing edge work as well how they use the edge work in games. I'll be honest I haven't done much research on the subject, but from the games I watch the talent level, in some cases, out there has surpassed the cross-ice model. There are AAA teams that are playing the full ice model that travel the country and into Canada, in fact we have a scrimmage against a team today from Chicago whose league is made up teams from Canada, Detroit, Chicago, Minnesota and New York. This past Spring our team played in a Mite AAA tournament about an hour from our rink, there was a team from Denver, another team that had kids from Phoenix, Chicago, St.Louis, Detroit, and another team out of Chicago. The talent in this tournament is at a level much higher than the cross-ice model. Our team plays at a AA level for league play this season and only play within two hours of our home rink. The full ice model does promote stick handling skills as well as skating skills (my son as a defenseman has improved his ability to skate backwards because he has to do this on a full sheet of ice). Also this model promotes positioning on the ice, offensive zone and defensive zone, as well as passing skills for breakouts as well as offensive zone passing.
The other reason for full ice, is our hand was dealt this way. Because of where our rink is located we have one other rink in the area and after that we are looking at a 30 minute drive to the next closest rink, well most of the teams north of us informed us they were no longer traveling to our rink for a cross-ice game, too far to drive for what was in essence stick and puck, then south of us all the Mite teams were adapting to the full ice model. So instead of our organization being squeezed out we adapted to the full ice model.
I am happy we have adapted to the full-ice model, is it correct or incorrect I guess we will see in the future development of the sport nationally and ultimately see which model developed the better talent. I am not saying cross-ice is not needed again my son skated cross-ice for a couple years then both talent and organizational needs dictated the move to full-ice. If the talent surpasses the cross-ice model there needs to be an outlet play the full ice model.