What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How does Lienart affect Boldin / Fitz (1 Viewer)

Texican

Footballguy
How do you think Lienart starting will affect the production of Boldin and Fitzgerald? I know Warner threw the ball pretty well (of course sometimes to the other team). I'm wondering if Lienart starting is only going to bump up the value of Edge and bump down the WRs values.

 
I was about to agree to a trade for Boldin when the news starting coming out that Green was thinking about it. I waited to find out for sure and then the news broke later in the day.

Personally I think there value takes a bit of a hit initially. It may prove to be more beneficial at the end, but I don't see how they will improve. Edge might though.

 
I'm in a similar boat. I just got offered his Boldin for my Tatum. I really need a WR, and it would have been an easy decision a couple of days ago, but now I am second guessing myself.

 
I think it hurts Edge as much as the receivers. Defenses will stack the box against the run and make Leinert beat them through the air until he can prove he is a capable NFL QB.

 
Based on Leinart's strengths/weaknesses, I think the affect may be negligible on Boldin, and may be somewhat negative on Fitzgerald.

Fitz is more of an over-the-top, deep receiver, with Boldin typically being the underneath/possession receiver. Leinart does not have a cannon, but is very good with short/accurate/touch throws. I think he'll look to Boldin quite a bit as a safety valve, and Boldin will again be a lock for 100 catches this year.

 
Short term I don't think it will effect Fitz or Boldin much, long term it can only help them. Warner has two big negatives:

1) Turnover machine (fumbles, picks)

2) He is immobile, causing sacks and equally important doesn't allow a play to continue.

Leinart isn't likely to turn the ball over like Warner does and he's very likely to buy himself and his WRs time by moving in the pocket and outside of the pocket. That will only help WRs like Fitz and Boldin get downfield.

 
Based on Leinart's strengths/weaknesses, I think the affect may be negligible on Boldin, and may be somewhat negative on Fitzgerald.Fitz is more of an over-the-top, deep receiver, with Boldin typically being the underneath/possession receiver. Leinart does not have a cannon, but is very good with short/accurate/touch throws. I think he'll look to Boldin quite a bit as a safety valve, and Boldin will again be a lock for 100 catches this year.
That is my biggest worry. I was offered Larry Fitzgerald yesterday afternoon before the announcement for Javon Walker & Joe Horn. ( I still have Driver & A. Johnson on my bench). I was sure to make the trade before, but now I don't know. Will Fitz's production drop off too much for this trade to be worth it? Will Boldin get the majority of throws because he is more of the possesion receiver? Will Dennis Green adjust to Leinhart strengths and both will still produce.I have a tough decision.
 
Seems like he won't do any worse than McNown did. He may have jitters the first game, but, I think he'll pick up the speed of the game quickly.

Does he tend to favor either WR over the other?

 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
I think its skewed by the small sample used. Teams have not needed to pass on Oakland to win. San Diego and Baltimore probably didn't even need an offense to beat oakland, there defense could put up enough points. I think KC's pass defense is a bit better, but the Denver game had little offense.
 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
Is it common for a bad team to rank highly in pass defense? Teams aren't exactly airing out against the Raiders when they find themselves up by a couple of scores in the first half, and the run game working well.
 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
I think its skewed by the small sample used. Teams have not needed to pass on Oakland to win. San Diego and Baltimore probably didn't even need an offense to beat oakland, there defense could put up enough points. I think KC's pass defense is a bit better, but the Denver game had little offense.
:goodposting: San Diego played Oakland Week 1 and barely threw the ball.
 
The ranking is like the Packers from last year... if you cant stop the run, teams dont pass on you as much. The only ranking worth noting is the overall ranking.

 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
I think its skewed by the small sample used. Teams have not needed to pass on Oakland to win. San Diego and Baltimore probably didn't even need an offense to beat oakland, there defense could put up enough points. I think KC's pass defense is a bit better, but the Denver game had little offense.
:goodposting: San Diego played Oakland Week 1 and barely threw the ball.
Cincy walloped KC and barely threw the ball either...too early to be looking at Team D stats.
 
Is the ranking based on yards? If so KC and Oak had a bye this week so both run and pass would be skewed.

 
The ranking is like the Packers from last year... if you cant stop the run, teams dont pass on you as much. The only ranking worth noting is the overall ranking.
That's a little misleading. Green Bay last year ranked 13th overall in FP allowed to QBs, but 21st when you adjust for SOS. That difference of 8 slots is indicative of Green Bay facing the Trent Dilfers, Brian Grieses, Seneca Wallaces and Kyle Orton's of the world. The Packers faced some of the sorriest QBs last year, inflating their pass D ranking.
 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
These kind of rankings are negligible at this point. KC has faced two teams who just about exclusively stuck to the ground game, and Oakland hasn't offered any reasons to pass. It doesn't mean they're good at defending it. I think Zona has no choice but to throw and will do so to an extent not affected by these rankings.However, I think the Zona offense takes a major blow here. Is it possible Leinart fares decently? It's possible, but for a guy who missed virtually all of the preaseason, has virtually no offensive line or run game, and isn't exaclty known for throwing the deep ball, I can't see how Boldin and Fitz don't drop off a bit.
 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
These kind of rankings are negligible at this point. KC has faced two teams who just about exclusively stuck to the ground game, and Oakland hasn't offered any reasons to pass. It doesn't mean they're good at defending it. I think Zona has no choice but to throw and will do so to an extent not affected by these rankings.However, I think the Zona offense takes a major blow here. Is it possible Leinart fares decently? It's possible, but for a guy who missed virtually all of the preaseason, has virtually no offensive line or run game, and isn't exaclty known for throwing the deep ball, I can't see how Boldin and Fitz don't drop off a bit.
So why did Green put him in?
 
Unchanged, both are still stone cold studs.
:goodposting: I didn't read the rest of the thread. It's no secret I'm not a big fan of Matt Leinart, but for Pete's sake Fitz and Boldin are open and capable of making a catch on every single play because of the way they use their bodies. They were studs with Warner or McCown, and both of those QBs struggled regularly. Matt is going to do what he does-- complete short quick passes, slice and dice, give his wrs opportunities to make plays-- and you cannot pick a better situation for him anywhere in the league. As much as I criticized him, as soon as he was drafted I considered him QB1 in rookie drafts by a landslide (would have been the same for VY or Cutler had they gone to AZ). This is fantasy gold. Warner is a trainwreck and has been for a long time. If Leinart struggles will he be worse than Warner? I doubt it. Will Boldin and Fitz vanish? No way. The value is unchanged.
 
Unchanged, both are still stone cold studs.
:goodposting: I didn't read the rest of the thread. It's no secret I'm not a big fan of Matt Leinart, but for Pete's sake Fitz and Boldin are open and capable of making a catch on every single play because of the way they use their bodies. They were studs with Warner or McCown, and both of those QBs struggled regularly. Matt is going to do what he does-- complete short quick passes, slice and dice, give his wrs opportunities to make plays-- and you cannot pick a better situation for him anywhere in the league. As much as I criticized him, as soon as he was drafted I considered him QB1 in rookie drafts by a landslide (would have been the same for VY or Cutler had they gone to AZ). This is fantasy gold. Warner is a trainwreck and has been for a long time. If Leinart struggles will he be worse than Warner? I doubt it. Will Boldin and Fitz vanish? No way. The value is unchanged.
I agree. All you had to do is watch the game on Sunday. It was ugly. I still think he was cuckoo from a couple hits. Anyway I think Leinart will do fine as long as he is upright. I watched him in the preseason and he at the very very least can get out of the pocket and avoid a sack/hurried throw to allow the play to develop. Warner couldn't move, hence the fumbles when he gets squished by a DLmen.
 
Another consideration is Leinart's schedule the next few weeksTeam Pass D rank@ Atl 17KC 3Chi 11 @ Oak 2
Holy crap. Did anyone else really think that the KC or Oakland defenses were any good?? This surprises me.
These kind of rankings are negligible at this point. KC has faced two teams who just about exclusively stuck to the ground game, and Oakland hasn't offered any reasons to pass. It doesn't mean they're good at defending it. I think Zona has no choice but to throw and will do so to an extent not affected by these rankings.However, I think the Zona offense takes a major blow here. Is it possible Leinart fares decently? It's possible, but for a guy who missed virtually all of the preaseason, has virtually no offensive line or run game, and isn't exaclty known for throwing the deep ball, I can't see how Boldin and Fitz don't drop off a bit.
So why did Green put him in?
Frustration? A building cry for Leinart from the fans? Grit his teeth through the growing pains now rather than later because he didn't see the playoffs with Warner anyway? The bottom line is, in MY opinion, the Zona offense drops down here. I don't think I know more than Denny Green, but don't pretend that if he's doing it it MUST mean it will help the Cardinals. He's not all-knowing as far as I know.
 
Give Leinart a couple games & you'll be seeing 250+ yard games from him. Warner was truly awful on Sunday; Leinart couldn't of done any worse. Awesome move by Dennis Green if the QB move is made.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top