Completely agree.At least an argument could be made for STL having a lot of tools in place to challenge SEA(though I still think SEA wins that division comfortably). Not buying into the ARZ hype and SF is at least two years away.Chi is of now my favorite to win the NFC. Sea could obviously push, but I'm thinking a SB hangover is in order. The NFC south and East are just going to be dog fights to the end and I can't see Chi not ending up with homefield throughout the playoffs with that schedule.
Maybe, if Kitna survives games 1 & 2 (Hawks & Bears).I figure the Pack to beat the Bears in game 1 (good defenses sometimes start slow, especially against an new offense they haven't seen) which should make them very very angry when they play the Lions in week 2.The Lions will Win the North!!!
they have to...
Pistons best regular season record in Basketball.
Red Wings best regular season record in Hockey.
Tigers so far the best record in Baseball.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Packers had #7 defense last year due to poor tackling. They added Hawk, Hodge, Woodson, & Pickens. All solid tacklers (Kemp & Pick were #1 & #2 last year). Take away 5-10 interceptions and you have a possible top 5 defense.The only thing I would add at this point is that in my leagues' scoring system Gado and Jones had very similar per week fantasy scoring (around 13.5 PPG). They finished like 13th and 14th in terms of PPG.
I am not intending to be disrespectful to the Bears. I can certainly see favoring them to win the division based on a single season doing MUCH better than the Packers. But I also think that the Packers DEF might be improved (slightly closing the gap) and that historically they have done much better than they did in a injury-swamped year.
Finally I have to say that getting rid of Sherman can only be adidtion by subtraction. I fully expect Favre's interceptions to be down this year from last and the play calling in the red zone to be improved as well.
The Bears will not win the Division next year and I will proove it!
2001 Chicago Bears 13-3 overall record with a 6-2 division record
2005 Chicago Bears 11-5 overall record with a 5-1 division record
oddly similar right?
well the 2002 Bears were 4-12 overall and a 2-4 division record
and 2006 will be oddly similar as well.
in 2001 they had 2 divisional losses, then they had 2 divisional wins in 2002.
in 2005 they had 1 divisional loss and so they will have 1 divisional win in 2006.
So after my mathmatical breakdown you must agree that the Bears will have the same number of games dropped off as from 2001 to 2002 and will have an overall record of 2-15 and a 1-5 division record.
Not a Packer fan, and it was just a joke!!!!good lord you chic-a-go's take things to seriouslyThe Bears will not win the Division next year and I will proove it!
2001 Chicago Bears 13-3 overall record with a 6-2 division record
2005 Chicago Bears 11-5 overall record with a 5-1 division record
oddly similar right?
well the 2002 Bears were 4-12 overall and a 2-4 division record
and 2006 will be oddly similar as well.
in 2001 they had 2 divisional losses, then they had 2 divisional wins in 2002.
in 2005 they had 1 divisional loss and so they will have 1 divisional win in 2006.
So after my mathmatical breakdown you must agree that the Bears will have the same number of games dropped off as from 2001 to 2002 and will have an overall record of 2-15 and a 1-5 division record.![]()
![]()
The only thing this "prooves" is that you spend too much time trying to figure "mathmatical" probability and not enough time learning to spell.
Oh, and that you're most likely a Packer fan.![]()
![]()
Wow, you REALLY get a lot of pleasure in seeing the packers fail in the playoffs...Actually it is new. But I guess we better watch some Packer playoff game tapes to learn what REAL humiliation is, eh buddy?Prepare to be humiliated. But that's nothing new to you guys, hey?If the Bears aren't 10-6 all Bears fans should be humiliated...
all those first year coaches they face....
the easiest schedule in the NFL...
And Griese to backup/push Grossman at their weak link position.![]()
As for the "spanking" we got in last years playoffs, I don't consider a 7 point loss a "spanking".
![]()
Again, for a real definition of a playoff "spanking" see the Packers last few playoff games.![]()
Oh wait, I can almost hear the keys being clicked by some furious cheese-lover. "AT LEAST WE MADE IT TO THE PLAYOFFS!!!"![]()
Sure thing there, pal. Nothing like rolling through a soft NFC North every year to be completely dismantled in the first couple of rounds.
...Remember 4th and 26?![]()
...How about Favre's pick-a-thon in St Louis?![]()
..Or maybe the crushing Atlanta loss at Lambeau, where you were supposedly unbeatable in January, to a ROOKIE QB from a DOME team?![]()
I love it when the Packers make the playoffs. It makes the unavoidable collapse in front of the entire nation that much sweeter.![]()
HilariousBajeebuz! Give daBehrs fans a break for crimany out loud!
Dis is da only time a year dey get ta talk da smackola!
![]()
![]()
![]()
I do. I used to have a boss who was a Green Gay fan. We would butt heads constantly. Any time he would bring up the Packers division (and Bears) dominance in the 90s, I would throw back their recent playoff record. That would shut him up real quick.Wow, you REALLY get a lot of pleasure in seeing the packers fail in the playoffs...Actually it is new. But I guess we better watch some Packer playoff game tapes to learn what REAL humiliation is, eh buddy?Prepare to be humiliated. But that's nothing new to you guys, hey?If the Bears aren't 10-6 all Bears fans should be humiliated...
all those first year coaches they face....
the easiest schedule in the NFL...
And Griese to backup/push Grossman at their weak link position.![]()
As for the "spanking" we got in last years playoffs, I don't consider a 7 point loss a "spanking".
![]()
Again, for a real definition of a playoff "spanking" see the Packers last few playoff games.![]()
Oh wait, I can almost hear the keys being clicked by some furious cheese-lover. "AT LEAST WE MADE IT TO THE PLAYOFFS!!!"![]()
Sure thing there, pal. Nothing like rolling through a soft NFC North every year to be completely dismantled in the first couple of rounds.
...Remember 4th and 26?![]()
...How about Favre's pick-a-thon in St Louis?![]()
..Or maybe the crushing Atlanta loss at Lambeau, where you were supposedly unbeatable in January, to a ROOKIE QB from a DOME team?![]()
I love it when the Packers make the playoffs. It makes the unavoidable collapse in front of the entire nation that much sweeter.![]()
Man finishing 2-15 will be very...very hard for the bears...hahahaThe Bears will not win the Division next year and I will proove it!
2001 Chicago Bears 13-3 overall record with a 6-2 division record
2005 Chicago Bears 11-5 overall record with a 5-1 division record
oddly similar right?
well the 2002 Bears were 4-12 overall and a 2-4 division record
and 2006 will be oddly similar as well.
in 2001 they had 2 divisional losses, then they had 2 divisional wins in 2002.
in 2005 they had 1 divisional loss and so they will have 1 divisional win in 2006.
So after my mathmatical breakdown you must agree that the Bears will have the same number of games dropped off as from 2001 to 2002 and will have an overall record of 2-15 and a 1-5 division record.