You need to know you're going to have competitive owners to do all play, NASCAR-style scoring, whatever you want to call it. Teams that get out slow will quit a few weeks in unless the guys just love the sport of it.All play seems cool and something I like. It sucks being second in points for the week and still losing.
Very similar in ours. 12 teams, 3 divisions. Division winners all get a spot, top 2 division winners get byes.We then give 2 wild card spots based on record + tiebreakers, and the final spot goes to the most total points team that doesn't already have a spot.It's also a keeper league, and the remaining 6 teams play for the top pick next year.Ours.....12 team league with 3 divisions.6 teams make the playoffs that occur in weeks 14-16.the 3 division winners with the top 2 division winners getting a bye.The other 3 wild card spots go to the top point getters that were not division winners.
Wheeeee! Finally, a topic about which I feel strongly enough to make my first post.IMO H2H is deeply flawed as it favors teams with the lowest points scored against rather than the best fantasy teams. We often see a top 3 team in scoring miss the playoffs because of a brutal schedule (something we have no control over in H2H) and bottom 6 scoring teams make the playoffs because they happen to have the fewest points scored against.
My preferred system is All-Play. All 12 teams go H2H every week, the highest scoring team for the week goes 11-0, second highest 10-1 etc. It captures high scoring AND scoring consistency which systems like H2H and total points seem to miss.
Thanks! And LOL at "been here for two months" - more like a year-plus. Though I didn't get around to actually signing up until 2 months ago.Lazy? Who ... me?great post! Even though you have been here for two months already - welcome to the Pool!!!!
This is how we do it in one league i am in, probably my favorite way. It is a H2H league, so can't do just points after division winners. Giving that last wild card spot to highest remaining total points helps a team with a horrible schedule.Very similar in ours. 12 teams, 3 divisions. Division winners all get a spot, top 2 division winners get byes.We then give 2 wild card spots based on record + tiebreakers, and the final spot goes to the most total points team that doesn't already have a spot.It's also a keeper league, and the remaining 6 teams play for the top pick next year.Ours.....12 team league with 3 divisions.6 teams make the playoffs that occur in weeks 14-16.the 3 division winners with the top 2 division winners getting a bye.The other 3 wild card spots go to the top point getters that were not division winners.
When's the sack race?'shredhead said:24 teams, 2-12 team conferences, 6-4 team divisions.12 game regular season, top 4 teams get a bye.Teams 5-12 play each other in week 13, with the winners facing teams 1-4 in week 14. Semi's week 15, Championship in week 16Teams 13-24 and the 4 week 13 losers play a 3 week combined point total for the toilet bowl prize.
When's the sack race?'shredhead said:24 teams, 2-12 team conferences, 6-4 team divisions.
12 game regular season, top 4 teams get a bye.
Teams 5-12 play each other in week 13, with the winners facing teams 1-4 in week 14. Semi's week 15, Championship in week 16
Teams 13-24 and the 4 week 13 losers play a 3 week combined point total for the toilet bowl prize.
I sense sarcasm and that you think your league is cooler than mine. That's fine by me, I wouldn't expect all you guppies to be able to handle a 24 team league.When's the sack race?'shredhead said:24 teams, 2-12 team conferences, 6-4 team divisions.12 game regular season, top 4 teams get a bye.Teams 5-12 play each other in week 13, with the winners facing teams 1-4 in week 14. Semi's week 15, Championship in week 16Teams 13-24 and the 4 week 13 losers play a 3 week combined point total for the toilet bowl prize.
Tell me about it. I'm 4-6 and sitting 10th out of 14 with the most fantasy points scored in my league.Tough luck (ie- 2nd most points scored facing the team that gets the most points that week).League is three H2H divisions with four teams/division.
Three division winners and top H2H make the playoffs.
IMO H2H is deeply flawed as it favors teams with the lowest points scored against rather than the best fantasy teams. We often see a top 3 team in scoring miss the playoffs because of a brutal schedule (something we have no control over in H2H) and bottom 6 scoring teams make the playoffs because they happen to have the fewest points scored against.
My preferred system is All-Play. All 12 teams go H2H every week, the highest scoring team for the week goes 11-0, second highest 10-1 etc. It captures high scoring AND scoring consistency which systems like H2H and total points seem to miss.
Team A appears to have scored points more consistently than Team B. Looks like Team B is riding a couple monster weeks and, likely, a bunch of very poor weeks.This is why I like All-Play over Total Points, it captures high scoring AND scoring consistency which is something I value (although YMMV on that).I say Team A goes to the playoffs.Which team is more worthy of a Wild Card trip to the playoffs?Team A has an All-Play record of 71-37-2 but has only scored 646 total points.Team B has an All-Play record of 62-48-0 but has scored 669 total points.[This is based on actual numbers taken from an MFL league I'm running.]
HereI sense sarcasm and that you think your league is cooler than mine. That's fine by me, I wouldn't expect all you guppies to be able to handle a 24 team league.When's the sack race?24 teams, 2-12 team conferences, 6-4 team divisions.
12 game regular season, top 4 teams get a bye.
Teams 5-12 play each other in week 13, with the winners facing teams 1-4 in week 14. Semi's week 15, Championship in week 16
Teams 13-24 and the 4 week 13 losers play a 3 week combined point total for the toilet bowl prize.
I share your values and agree with your points, but this discussion made me pause. I had assumed that total points and all-play would track more closely, but looking at our standings it seems that there's enough divergence that the wild card picture would be very different under the two approaches.In any case, we're set up for all-play and I'm not looking to change, but food for thought.Team A appears to have scored points more consistently than Team B. Looks like Team B is riding a couple monster weeks and, likely, a bunch of very poor weeks.This is why I like All-Play over Total Points, it captures high scoring AND scoring consistency which is something I value (although YMMV on that).I say Team A goes to the playoffs.Which team is more worthy of a Wild Card trip to the playoffs?Team A has an All-Play record of 71-37-2 but has only scored 646 total points.Team B has an All-Play record of 62-48-0 but has scored 669 total points.[This is based on actual numbers taken from an MFL league I'm running.]
HFA is another concept that doesn't get nearly enough love in the FF universe.If the whole point of the playoffs is to reward the most consistent teams, why should we be so willing to accept the random statistical noise that one week of scoring brings once the playoffs actually start?In leagues I used to run I expecimented with various types of HFA. Eventually I settled on giving a 2-TD bump to the 1-seed over the 4-seed and 1-TD for the 2-seed over the 3 - and nothing for the title game - which seemed to work fairly well. But I really like your idea of starting with average points per game from the regular season. I may have to float that one to a couple of commissioners in my leagues next year.Teams start with average points per game (kind of a "Home Field advantage" to the top teams) and add weeks 15 and 16 to that. Champion is the team that has the highest score over the two weeks.
Why not do 6. 2 Divisions (or no divisions doesn't really matter). Top 2 get a bye and next 4 get in.Our playoffs allow too many team in (8 out of 12) - but we give the first three seeds to division winners (determined by overall record then division record then point differential). We then award seeds 4-8 to based on overall record, then division record, then point differential, then head to head, then coin flip if necessary (it has never come to that).I have proposed eliminating divisions and going to a 4 team playoff based on record, then head to head, then point differential but have been repeatedly denied as the commish prefers divisional play.