Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Simple question: How long will LT remain the #1RB in FF? Who has a chance to supplant him? Bush? Alexander? LJ? SJax? Gore? When, and for how many years?
Simple question: How long will LT remain the #1RB in FF? Who has a chance to supplant him? Bush? Alexander? LJ? SJax? Gore? When, and for how many years?
So the question is, when do you move LT to maximize his value. My guess is even when he starts to tail off he still is going to be a good option to start (assumming he is healthy). He just will not be that dominate back.
Even when he does start to tail off you still will probably get good value given it is LT.
As a LT owner, I've thought of this question recently.
Actually last year was his first time being #1, though he has been considered worthy of the #1 pick for the last 4 years or so.
I'd say he has at least two years on top left. Even though I'm a homer, I'd say Bush has the best chance to supplant him based on talent, opportunity, and durability.
So the question is, when do you move LT to maximize his value. My guess is even when he starts to tail off he still is going to be a good option to start (assumming he is healthy). He just will not be that dominate back.Even when he does start to tail off you still will probably get good value given it is LT.As a LT owner, I've thought of this question recently.
As an Alexander owner, I never could have imagined last off-season was the right time to move him. You basically have to guess and pray that you're right.
Actually last year was his first time being #1, though he has been considered worthy of the #1 pick for the last 4 years or so. I'd say he has at least two years on top left. Even though I'm a homer, I'd say Bush has the best chance to supplant him based on talent, opportunity, and durability.
In terms of being chosen #1, there are lots of backs that have the talent and opportunity to supplant LT, but he has such a high floor and they come with enough ??'s that the wise pick is LT. So, he'll remain the #1 RB until someone's floor exceeds his or the combination of talent, opps, situation... come with minimal ??'s making the risk worth the gamble.
I'll give him 3 more years of being A top back. Probably the best comparison I can come up with in recent years is Marshall Faulk. MF was still elite in years 7 and 8, good in year 9, solid in 10-11. I'd expect about the same from LT.
Actually last year was his first time being #1, though he has been considered worthy of the #1 pick for the last 4 years or so. I'd say he has at least two years on top left. Even though I'm a homer, I'd say Bush has the best chance to supplant him based on talent, opportunity, and durability.
Obviously. But if you've been following him, you'd see that he improved a great deal toward the end of last season. He's a smart kid and has a good tutor in Deuce. Anyway, I was just addressing the OP's question.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.