How many snaps did Josh Wilson get last Sunday? (1 Viewer)

[drew726]

I know trufant is back and wilson only had 1 tackle. He got returns back which is nice but I'm just whatever whats the % he's on the field. Don't know if I should start Goldson or him next week.

 

[Kal]

Im doing the player participation for this game and looking at my schedule this week I should have answer by Saturday on this, hopefully Friday. Dallas are more 2 tight end than 3 wide receiver which may have affected Wilson but I'll have to check this when I do the game.

I'm no fantasy expert (I'm pretty rubbish at it tbh) but Detroit aren't a heavy 3 wide receiver team so Wilson may not see a lot of the field (even if he should see more action than Lucas). The other thing to consider is the Seahawks are a team who will rest players if they get up early and they have blown out inferior opposition so Wilson could work his way into the starting lineup against a Detroit team that goes pass happy.

But thats me being overly speculative. Anyways, in case you don't see it I'll post the link to the player participation we do at profootballfocus.com when its up

 

[ADP]

I know trufant is back and wilson only had 1 tackle. He got returns back which is nice but I'm just whatever whats the % he's on the field. Don't know if I should start Goldson or him next week.

I think Goldson is a must start every week right now.

 

[Kool-Aid Larry]

Im doing the player participation for this game and looking at my schedule this week I should have answer by Saturday on this, hopefully Friday. Dallas are more 2 tight end than 3 wide receiver which may have affected Wilson but I'll have to check this when I do the game.I'm no fantasy expert (I'm pretty rubbish at it tbh) but Detroit aren't a heavy 3 wide receiver team so Wilson may not see a lot of the field (even if he should see more action than Lucas). The other thing to consider is the Seahawks are a team who will rest players if they get up early and they have blown out inferior opposition so Wilson could work his way into the starting lineup against a Detroit team that goes pass happy.But thats me being overly speculative. Anyways, in case you don't see it I'll post the link to the player participation we do at profootballfocus.com when its up

just wanted to say thx for all the work on that site --- it's one of the coolest sites I've ever seen, and I pimp it every chance I get.in fact, it's the only site I've ever told my leaguemates about 'cuz it's too good to keep to myself.as for the 3 wide question --- you're right on the money about dallas.I went through the first week when you guys put the games up earlier this year and counted up 3+ wide sets -- here's what I got:(dallas came in 3rd from the bottom)first 3 quarters 3wr/total snaps -- whole gameWEEK 1*IND (v jax 14-12) 43/54 (80%) -- (55/71 - 77%)*AZ (v sf 16-20) 37/55 (67%) -- 53/72 (74%)*PIT(v ten 13-10) 30/48 (63%) -- 53/74 (72%)WAS (@nyg 17-23) 23/39 (59%) -- 33/49 (67%)DEN (@cin 12-7 ) 22/41 (54%) -- 31/56 (55%)HOU (v nyj 7-24) 21/39 (54%) -- 32/50 (64%)*NE (v buf 25-24) 31/60 (52%) -- 50/82 (61%)PHI (@car 38-10) 26/51 (50%) -- 34/69 (50%) GB (v chi 21-15) 23/46 (50%) -- 30/58 (52%)MIA (@atl 7-19 ) 21/42 (50%) -- 35/59 (60%)OAK (v sd 20-24) 26/56 (46%) -- 36/73 (50%)CLE (v min 20-34) 16/36 (44%) -- 47/67 (70%)BUF (@ne 24-25) 15/36 (42%) -- 29/56 (52%)KC (@bal 24-38) 11/27 (40%) -- 22/47 (47%)NYJ (@hou 24-7 ) 22/58 (38%) -- 22/80 (28%)STL (@sea 0-28) 18/48 (38%) -- 35/65 (54%)NO ( v det 45-27) 19/54 (35%) -- 22/75 (30%)SD (@oak 24-20) 17/49 (35%) -- 28/69 (40%)SEA (v stl 28-0 ) 17/52 (33%) -- 24/70 (34%)CIN (v den 7-12) 16/48 (33%) -- 28/63 (45%)CHI (@gb 15-21) 16/53 (30%) -- 21/72 (30%)JAX (@ind 12-14) 13/43 (30%) -- 19/58 (33%)DET (@no 27-45) 14/50 (28%) -- 18/60 (30%)BAL (v kc 38-24) 18/67 (27%) -- 21/90 (23%)MIN (@cle 34-20) 14/51 (27%) -- 16/65 (25%)TEN (@pit 10-13) 14/51 (27%) -- 16/65 (25%) CAR (v phi 10-38) 11/52 (21%) -- 32/74 (43%) SF (@az 20-16) 9/42 (21%) -- 15/64 (23%)NYG (v was 23-17) 9/43 (20%) -- 17/66 (26%)DAL (@tb 34-21) 8/43 (19%) -- 8/53 (15%)ATL (v mia 19-7) 7/48 (15%) -- 12/68 (18%)TB (v dal 21-34) 7/52 (13%) -- 22/76 (29%)ranking them by % was pretty arbitrary, as absolute snaps are really all that matters if you're concerned about player participation and game stats, but these things will change from game to game.note -- the following teams played a bit different number of nickel snaps compared to what you might expect given their opponent's formations:TB (v DAL) played 18 nickel snaps, while their opponent played only 8 corresponding offensive snapsMIA (@ATL) 21 nickel snaps vs 12 expectedGB (v CHI) 47 vs 21 expectedSEA (v STL) only 27 vs 35 expectededit ps: when you're crushing some team like dallas was crushing seattle, chances are you aren't running 3 wide later in the game, so that would further distort things, if we're making the case that he's on nickel duty.