This is the hard part. This is a new league with 12 friends who have NEVER auctioned before. I have done it, but the others are all rooks. I do not know any tendancies. I am guessing BIG $$ to BIG NAMES?? Is that how it usually goes for first timers?How many teams in your league? That can make a pretty big difference.I would spend less on QB (a lot, honestly) and spend more on RB1 and RB2. But I suscribe to the theory of getting two QBs in the 9-12 tier, and not getting a top 5. I think a lot of people are leaning towards the top QB position this year, which will mean (IMHO) paying a premium for Manning, Palmer, or one of the three B's.Just a question, based on past experience with your league, do people pay a lot for deep WR/RB's? We usually spend more on the top tier guys, then fill out several roster spots with $1 and $2 guys. Those are usually the sleeper-types. You've allocated a lot more for WR 4-5 and RB 4-5 than I would have. But it depends on how your league-mates tend to allocate their money...
Even though TD passes are 6 points???I would spend less on QB (a lot, honestly) and spend more on RB1 and RB2. But I suscribe to the theory of getting two QBs in the 9-12 tier, and not getting a top 5. I think a lot of people are leaning towards the top QB position this year, which will mean (IMHO) paying a premium for Manning, Palmer, or one of the three B's.
We play with TD passes worth 5 points each, and have for a number of years. It has always paid off for me to avoid overspending (or drafting too early, in elder years) on the big-name QBs, and get kind of the "last starter, first backup" or QB 12 and QB 13...One of them usually does very well, and the money you save can get you Stephen Jackson instead of Clinton Portis.Even though TD passes are 6 points???I would spend less on QB (a lot, honestly) and spend more on RB1 and RB2. But I suscribe to the theory of getting two QBs in the 9-12 tier, and not getting a top 5. I think a lot of people are leaning towards the top QB position this year, which will mean (IMHO) paying a premium for Manning, Palmer, or one of the three B's.
I spend around $160 to $170 on my starters (1 QB, 2 RB's 3 WR's or TE's, 1K and 1 Def). Passing TD's are easier to predict so draft a couple of cheap QB's from teams with weak D's and average running games (Farve, Kitna, Losman, Leinert, and Schaub come to mind). You can play matchups in games that might be shootouts during the season and use your extra QB dollars to spend closer to $100 on your top two RB's.I would also pony up more for a decent starting Kicker or D before I spent $3 on a backup TE.We play with TD passes worth 5 points each, and have for a number of years. It has always paid off for me to avoid overspending (or drafting too early, in elder years) on the big-name QBs, and get kind of the "last starter, first backup" or QB 12 and QB 13...One of them usually does very well, and the money you save can get you Stephen Jackson instead of Clinton Portis.Even though TD passes are 6 points???I would spend less on QB (a lot, honestly) and spend more on RB1 and RB2. But I suscribe to the theory of getting two QBs in the 9-12 tier, and not getting a top 5. I think a lot of people are leaning towards the top QB position this year, which will mean (IMHO) paying a premium for Manning, Palmer, or one of the three B's.
Anyone happen to have this link? I couldn't find it, but I'm very curious to give it a read.I believe that David Dodds wrote a great article on how much to allocate per position. He based it on a review of the budget allocations of winning teams in auction leagues. I think it is a great place to start.
Yes, his article is in the 2006 archives. His recommendation was: * 11% QB * 50% RB * 33% WR * 3% TE * 2% DST * 1% PKOf course, it depends on the number of teams, the scoring system, the draft vs. free agent budgets, the skill of the other coaches, depth and number of players expected to be taken, risk you are willing to bear, etc. In other words, you have to create the allocations that you think best fit your league and your individual goals. Since you are 6 pts per QB TD, your QB % might be higher. Also, in an all rookie league, they likely will be conservative and go for depth, so prices may be nicely depressed to help you build a killer team.I believe that David Dodds wrote a great article on how much to allocate per position. He based it on a review of the budget allocations of winning teams in auction leagues. I think it is a great place to start.
YES - it doesn't change the scoring as much as you think AND more importantly the QB are only relative to the other QB. Peyton Manning is the only one who should go for big dollars - otherwise $20 for both of your QB is fine (and you may have money left over to move elsewhere)Dodds % distribution as shown there is very good.Even though TD passes are 6 points???I would spend less on QB (a lot, honestly) and spend more on RB1 and RB2. But I suscribe to the theory of getting two QBs in the 9-12 tier, and not getting a top 5. I think a lot of people are leaning towards the top QB position this year, which will mean (IMHO) paying a premium for Manning, Palmer, or one of the three B's.