What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I really hate Daylight Savings Time (1 Viewer)

id like to go back in time with avril lavigne and have her ask the daylight savings crew why they gotta go and make things so complicated but mostly because id like to see them answer up to a fightin canadian independent woman who sometimes uses the number 8 in the word skater but that is just me talkin take that to the bank bromigos
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


 
Last edited:
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
We tried it in the 70's and no one liked it. https://www.washingtonian.com/2022/...light-saving-time-in-the-70s-people-hated-it/
 
Last edited:
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
We tried it in the 70's and no one liked it. https://www.washingtonian.com/2022/...light-saving-time-in-the-70s-people-hated-it/
Yea but people in the 70's were jerks
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


See I'm daylight savings time. I love the option of getting a round of golf in after working in the summer so I like it being light until 9:00. 7:30-8:00 summer sunsets seems too early to me. It's still light out at 5:00 am, at least in the northern part of the US. Winter would be brutal though so I get where you're coming from
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


See I'm daylight savings time. I love the option of getting a round of golf in after working in the summer so I like it being light until 9:00. 7:30-8:00 summer sunsets seems too early to me. It's still light out at 5:00 am, at least in the northern part of the US. Winter would be brutal though so I get where you're coming from
I'm up north and love morning light. I get up pretty early to get in a workout before my day really starts. Coffee on the front porch and then a run or ride with a sunrise is heaven to me.
 
They should do whatever is best for school aged kids, who don't have any choice but to go to school at the time that they are told.

And yet the early-morning darkness quickly proved dangerous for children: A 6-year-old Alexandria girl was struck by a car on her way to Polk Elementary School on January 7; the accident broke her leg. Two Prince George’s County students were hurt in February. In the weeks after the change, eight Florida kids were killed in traffic accidents. Florida’s governor, Reubin Askew, asked for Congress to repeal the measure. “It’s time to recognize that we may well have made a mistake,” US Senator **** Clark of Iowa said during a speech in Congress on January 28, 1974. In the Washington area, some schools delayed their start times until the sun caught up with the clock.
 
They should do whatever is best for school aged kids, who don't have any choice but to go to school at the time that they are told.

And yet the early-morning darkness quickly proved dangerous for children: A 6-year-old Alexandria girl was struck by a car on her way to Polk Elementary School on January 7; the accident broke her leg. Two Prince George’s County students were hurt in February. In the weeks after the change, eight Florida kids were killed in traffic accidents. Florida’s governor, Reubin Askew, asked for Congress to repeal the measure. “It’s time to recognize that we may well have made a mistake,” US Senator **** Clark of Iowa said during a speech in Congress on January 28, 1974. In the Washington area, some schools delayed their start times until the sun caught up with the clock.
I agree. In Ohio the sun would rise at 9am in December if we went to permanent DST. At least for Ohio I like the time change.
 
They should do whatever is best for school aged kids, who don't have any choice but to go to school at the time that they are told.

And yet the early-morning darkness quickly proved dangerous for children: A 6-year-old Alexandria girl was struck by a car on her way to Polk Elementary School on January 7; the accident broke her leg. Two Prince George’s County students were hurt in February. In the weeks after the change, eight Florida kids were killed in traffic accidents. Florida’s governor, Reubin Askew, asked for Congress to repeal the measure. “It’s time to recognize that we may well have made a mistake,” US Senator **** Clark of Iowa said during a speech in Congress on January 28, 1974. In the Washington area, some schools delayed their start times until the sun caught up with the clock.
I agree. In Ohio the sun would rise at 9am in December if we went to permanent DST. At least for Ohio I like the time change.
Ohio is dumb though. They should just move to Central and get it over with.
 
They should do whatever is best for school aged kids, who don't have any choice but to go to school at the time that they are told.

And yet the early-morning darkness quickly proved dangerous for children: A 6-year-old Alexandria girl was struck by a car on her way to Polk Elementary School on January 7; the accident broke her leg. Two Prince George’s County students were hurt in February. In the weeks after the change, eight Florida kids were killed in traffic accidents. Florida’s governor, Reubin Askew, asked for Congress to repeal the measure. “It’s time to recognize that we may well have made a mistake,” US Senator **** Clark of Iowa said during a speech in Congress on January 28, 1974. In the Washington area, some schools delayed their start times until the sun caught up with the clock.
I agree. In Ohio the sun would rise at 9am in December if we went to permanent DST. At least for Ohio I like the time change.
Just move the starting times for schools to later. Kids need more sleep, anyway.

At least for me I can't see a much bigger loss in quality of life than losing that hour that DST gives. I do a ton of things after work and before sunset. Losing that would be a terrible outcome. I'm fine with states choosing - but at least allow the option of DST all the time.
 
At least for me I can't see a much bigger loss in quality of life than losing that hour that DST gives. I do a ton of things after work and before sunset.
Unlike a lot of people while I don't love the time changes they don't drive me crazy, but losing DST in the summer would be horrible. If it was only based on my preference I'd go forward another hour from DST - I've been in places where the sunset is after 9:30PM and it is glorious.

I guess for those of us nearing retirement age it won't matter too much once we take the plunge, a retiree's schedule is much less dictated by the official time.
 
At least for me I can't see a much bigger loss in quality of life than losing that hour that DST gives. I do a ton of things after work and before sunset.
Unlike a lot of people while I don't love the time changes they don't drive me crazy, but losing DST in the summer would be horrible. If it was only based on my preference I'd go forward another hour from DST - I've been in places where the sunset is after 9:30PM and it is glorious.

I guess for those of us nearing retirement age it won't matter too much once we take the plunge, a retiree's schedule is much less dictated by the official time.
Ooooh. Double DST team unite! :hifive:
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
Can't argue with that. I know I'm in the minority. My wife goes to work really early and that means I'm up pretty early too. Over time i got used to it and now I'm solidly a morning person. In the summer the earlier the sun is up the better for a run or bike ride before the day even gets started. In the winter up north where I am it won't get light until 9-9:30 and these long cold dark winters are bad enough. That said, I'm ok either way as long as we stop changing the damn clocks and just leave it alone. That's more important to me than which one. Somebody just make a decision and I'll be good with either, but prefer standard time.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
I mean keep the system we have today with moving the clock back in November and forward in March, no solution is perfect but this allows the kids not to wait in the dark and people to enjoy extra time for most of the year for outdoor activities, while only having to deal w/ a minor inconvenience twice a year.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
I mean keep the system we have today with moving the clock back in November and forward in March, no solution is perfect but this allows the kids not to wait in the dark and people to enjoy extra time for most of the year for outdoor activities, while only having to deal w/ a minor inconvenience twice a year.
I hear you, and this isn’t a hill I’d die on. But the increased risk with the time change is real.
 
I guess for those of us nearing retirement age it won't matter too much once we take the plunge, a retiree's schedule is much less dictated by the official time.
I plan on throwing all clocks away once I retire
Half the time I don't even know what day it is
Same. I retired at the end of last year and it takes me a few seconds/minutes/hours when I wake up to figure out what day it is.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
I mean keep the system we have today with moving the clock back in November and forward in March, no solution is perfect but this allows the kids not to wait in the dark and people to enjoy extra time for most of the year for outdoor activities, while only having to deal w/ a minor inconvenience twice a year.
I hear you, and this isn’t a hill I’d die on. But the increased risk with the time change is real.
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?
 
They should do whatever is best for school aged kids, who don't have any choice but to go to school at the time that they are told.

And yet the early-morning darkness quickly proved dangerous for children: A 6-year-old Alexandria girl was struck by a car on her way to Polk Elementary School on January 7; the accident broke her leg. Two Prince George’s County students were hurt in February. In the weeks after the change, eight Florida kids were killed in traffic accidents. Florida’s governor, Reubin Askew, asked for Congress to repeal the measure. “It’s time to recognize that we may well have made a mistake,” US Senator **** Clark of Iowa said during a speech in Congress on January 28, 1974. In the Washington area, some schools delayed their start times until the sun caught up with the clock.
I agree. In Ohio the sun would rise at 9am in December if we went to permanent DST. At least for Ohio I like the time change.
Ohio is dumb though. They should just move to Central and get it over with.
And give up our 9:15 summer sunsets? Get outta here
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
I mean keep the system we have today with moving the clock back in November and forward in March, no solution is perfect but this allows the kids not to wait in the dark and people to enjoy extra time for most of the year for outdoor activities, while only having to deal w/ a minor inconvenience twice a year.
I hear you, and this isn’t a hill I’d die on. But the increased risk with the time change is real.
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
 
"I personally struggle with the two choices here, because it's a question of what do you care about more: sunshine and joy and fun and money, or health, mental health, physical health,"

Are these really the choices?
No, he's confused. It's the change itself that causes health issues. Switching to DST all the time keeps the joy and drops the health issues (so does keeping standard time, but standard time sucks - i want daylight later in the day and so do most Americans). It's a no brainer, so of course there is obfuscation at the highest levels. You just shake your head sometimes.
There is some evidence that increased morning sunlight can improve sleep via setting and maintaining circadian rhythm. So while the change is the biggest factor, keeping standard time does have an added health advantage. I believe the comments quoted in the link were made after a professor had testified to those benefits.

I'm also a morning person and if put to a vote I'm going with standard time everytime.

ETA snippet from the professor at the hearing and the comments the above quote were in response to:
"Dr. Johnson is a professor of neurology at UMass Chan School of Medicine-Baystate and medical director of the Baystate Health Regional Sleep Program in Springfield, Massachusetts. She is vice president of Save Standard Time, a volunteer nonprofit advocating for permanent standard time. She is also a member of the AASM Advocacy Committee and sleep section chair of the American Academy of Neurology."


But less time in the evening for physical activity. And how many people go outside and walk or sit in the sun in the morning, most people are getting ready for work 5 out of the 7 days.
:hey:
Not to mention kids waiting for the school bus.
So seems like should keep things as they are then...
If you mean DST, sure (And stop calling it that). The change is what irritates people and increased risk.
I mean keep the system we have today with moving the clock back in November and forward in March, no solution is perfect but this allows the kids not to wait in the dark and people to enjoy extra time for most of the year for outdoor activities, while only having to deal w/ a minor inconvenience twice a year.
I hear you, and this isn’t a hill I’d die on. But the increased risk with the time change is real.
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.
 
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.

It's an hour. People lose more sleep than that over 15 various sports events throughout the year. Should those be canceled? New Year's Eve celebrations too?
 
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.

It's an hour. People lose more sleep than that over 15 various sports events throughout the year. Should those be canceled? New Year's Eve celebrations too?
Is DST optional?
 
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.

It's an hour. People lose more sleep than that over 15 various sports events throughout the year. Should those be canceled? New Year's Eve celebrations too?
Is DST optional?

What time you go to bed is.
 
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.

It's an hour. People lose more sleep than that over 15 various sports events throughout the year. Should those be canceled? New Year's Eve celebrations too?
Is DST optional?

What time you go to bed is.
Have you never had difficulty falling asleep an hour earlier than usual? Some people need to wake up in the morning at a set time, and kids can make going to bed an hour earlier harder even if you have the flexibility.
 
I'm sure this was discussed above but what is the risk?

If it's the same studies posted earlier in this thread it's some flimsy cherry picked studies about more accidents etc around the time change, that fail to account for the fact that they intentionally extended out the period of the study to include St Patrick's Day (highest accident day of the year, for obvious reasons), and also that those kind of things tend to follow a predictable pattern throughout various times of the entire year where spring is one of the times that naturally sees more of those occurrences anyway.
Even if we assume the studies are flawed, most people lose sleep when you set the clocks forward. Less sleep has been proven to increase risk.

It's an hour. People lose more sleep than that over 15 various sports events throughout the year. Should those be canceled? New Year's Eve celebrations too?
False equivalence. Nobody is forcing anyone to watch sports events or stay up late to celebrate New Years. DST is forced. Regardless off whether you go to bed at the same time and get up at the same time following the change, your body clock needs to adjust and that can take days or weeks. It isn’t just about that one hour lost on the day it switches. Speaking from experience, it wrecks me for days as well as my kids. It’s dumb and not necessary. An antiquated system that needs to go away.
 
Have you never had difficulty falling asleep an hour earlier than usual? Some people need to wake up in the morning at a set time, and kids can make going to bed an hour earlier harder even if you have the flexibility.

False equivalence. Nobody is forcing anyone to watch sports events or stay up late to celebrate New Years. DST is forced. Regardless off whether you go to bed at the same time and get up at the same time following the change, your body clock needs to adjust and that can take days or weeks. It isn’t just about that one hour lost on the day it switches. Speaking from experience, it wrecks me for days as well as my kids. It’s dumb and not necessary. An antiquated system that needs to go away.

What about your job making you come in an hour early for a morning meeting? Should that be illegal? Jury duty earlier in the morning than you usually get up? Illegal? Standardized school testing like the SATs scheduled early. Your surgeon scheduling your procedure for 7am.

The reality is people's sleep varies widlly throughout the year. Sometimes you have one of those things above. Sometimes your kid is sick and keeps you up late. Sometimes you watch an extra episode on Netflix. Sometimes you stay out late for drinks. Sometimes you have trouble falling asleep and are up later than usual. Sometimes you scroll on Reddit or FBG for longer than you intended.

This is one of those things where the amount of energy expended on one hour one time per year surprises me. It's one hour. One time per year. And in exchange we get awesomer summers.
 
Last edited:
To me it's not the specific time, it's the unnecessary changing back and forth. Pick a time and stick with it.
I get that view but the argument is the safety of kids waiting for the bus and going to school in the dark warrants the changing back and forth, and the extra time that daylight savings time provides in the summer makes that time of year much more enjoyable. So there's a trade off no matter which option you choose, and to me the flipping back and forth seems like a small inconvenience. But I get everyone prioritizes things differently so there's going to be a contingent that prefers each option.
 
Have you never had difficulty falling asleep an hour earlier than usual? Some people need to wake up in the morning at a set time, and kids can make going to bed an hour earlier harder even if you have the flexibility.

False equivalence. Nobody is forcing anyone to watch sports events or stay up late to celebrate New Years. DST is forced. Regardless off whether you go to bed at the same time and get up at the same time following the change, your body clock needs to adjust and that can take days or weeks. It isn’t just about that one hour lost on the day it switches. Speaking from experience, it wrecks me for days as well as my kids. It’s dumb and not necessary. An antiquated system that needs to go away.

What about your job making you come in an hour early for a morning meeting? Should that be illegal? Jury duty earlier in the morning than you usually get up? Illegal? Standardized school testing like the SATs scheduled early. Your surgeon scheduling your procedure for 7am.

The reality is people's sleep varies widlly throughout the year. Sometimes you have one of those things above. Sometimes your kid is sick and keeps you up late. Sometimes you watch an extra episode on Netflix. Sometimes you stay out late for drinks. Sometimes you have trouble falling asleep and are up later than usual. Sometimes you scroll on Reddit or FBG for longer than you intended.

This is one of those things where the amount of energy expended on one hour one time per year surprises me. It's one hour. One time per year. And in exchange we get awesomer summers.
Has nobody pointed out yet that this is the only time it happens to every single person at once, and that's what really causes problems? Yes, lack of sleep always is an issue.

Let's pretend for a second that everything you say is a true and good and useful and valid point. Even then:

When it's here and there among a small number on any given day there's not really a societal issue. A driver not as alert as they should be can be avoided by the other 9/10 who are as alert as normal. But if all 10 of them aren't alert, then it should be fairly obvious there will be issues, right?

Here are just the first couple things that came up when I googled for unbiased science on whether daylight savings time is beneficial:

Johns Hopkins

American Academy of Sleep Medicine
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top