What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I Weep... (1 Viewer)

No rest on the weekend

Today's top postersDSP 109 4.50%

Raider Nation 64 2.64%

SaintsInDome2006 58 2.39%

Christo 51 2.10%

LivinNsc 44 1.82%

John Bender 40 1.65%

Homer J Simpson 40 1.65%

St. Louis Bob 34 1.40%

Mr. Pickles 34 1.40%

Soulfly3 34 1.40%

Doctor Detroit 33 1.36%

Faust 32 1.32%

ghostguy123 28 1.16%

Officer Pete Malloy 25 1.03%

Koya 25 1.03%

drummer 23 0.95%

pizzatyme 22 0.91%

MoveToSkypager 21 0.87%

got_nugs 21 0.87%

ChainsawU 21 0.87%
Ive still got it
Wasn't your GF coming over with aunt flow? Are you and her co-posting?
Aunt flo was too heavy so I only got a bj. We watched django and she fell asleep I went on my phone. Heading home now

 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.

 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.
Under what pretense should the top poster on a board for posting be banned for posting?

 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.
Under what pretense should the top poster on a board for posting be banned for posting?
 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.
Under what pretense should the top poster on a board for posting be banned for posting?
What is the criteria? Who determines my posts are bad?

 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.
Under what pretense should the top poster on a board for posting be banned for posting?
What is the criteria? Who determines my posts are bad?
That's the beauty. You have already determined it. And you have determined that they're ####.
 
Ignoramus said:
Mods, can you write some program that automatically gives whoever is at the top of this list each day a one-month timeout? I don't have the analysis to back it up, but I'm guessing that in the vast majority of cases, the ratio of #### to quality is pretty high.
I'm seeing no reason to back off this.
Under what pretense should the top poster on a board for posting be banned for posting?
What is the criteria? Who determines my posts are bad?
That's the beauty. You have already determined it. And you have determined that they're ####.
That makes no sense. You live up to your screename

 
Am I the only one that is angry not to rank in the list that spock keeps posting? I feel like there is a northern bias built in to the system or something.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top