Your Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
Just wait, he hasn't gone to the all star game yet......YET.Your Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
Why? Funkley is an equal opportunity man loverYour Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
Simply because I don't think he'll be all that good. He can hit for average, but other than that I see no exceptional qualities.Why? Funkley is an equal opportunity man loverYour Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
These numbers are definitely obtainable given 150+ starts this season.
Yeah, that .600 slg he did in the minors just screams 'average'.Simply because I don't think he'll be all that good. He can hit for average, but other than that I see no exceptional qualities.Why? Funkley is an equal opportunity man loverYour Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
I'm talking about 2007 roto leagues. He is going earlier and earlier in draft this spring. He'll have some serious improvement to make on his .285/.314/.416 line in 276 MLB at-bats last season to be worth that kind of selection. I'll take Rickie Weeks or Josh Barfield at that point in the draft and be happy.Yeah, that .600 slg he did in the minors just screams 'average'.Simply because I don't think he'll be all that good. He can hit for average, but other than that I see no exceptional qualities.Why? Funkley is an equal opportunity man loverYour Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
Hit MUCH better after the 2nd call up and not getting jerked around with playing time. Plus, he's younger than those guys.I'm talking about 2007 roto leagues. He is going earlier and earlier in draft this spring. He'll have some serious improvement to make on his .285/.314/.416 line in 276 MLB at-bats last season to be worth that kind of selection. I'll take Rickie Weeks or Josh Barfield at that point in the draft and be happy.Yeah, that .600 slg he did in the minors just screams 'average'.Simply because I don't think he'll be all that good. He can hit for average, but other than that I see no exceptional qualities.Why? Funkley is an equal opportunity man loverYour Kendrick man-love fascinates me.He's no Howie Kendrick
Why would you have Cano and Barfield ahead of Roberts?I have Kinsler as my fifth best 2B, but with a very small disparity from 2-5 (Cano, Barfield, Roberts, Kinsler), and I'm passing on taking those guys with early picks and nabbing Kinsler in the middle rounds.
I'm expecting the neighborhood of .300 90 20 80 20
6 teamer?He's still out there in my league - thinking about picking him up as a middle infield utility guy. I've got Kendrick in the 2B spot now, with Ryan Freel as a utility guy, but Stephen Drew, B.J. Upton, and Kinsler are all out there and are tempting me...
6 teamer?He's still out there in my league - thinking about picking him up as a middle infield utility guy. I've got Kendrick in the 2B spot now, with Ryan Freel as a utility guy, but Stephen Drew, B.J. Upton, and Kinsler are all out there and are tempting me...
No, it's a 10-teamer - 12 2Bs were selected, but not Kinsler. I just dropped Corey Hart and picked up Kinsler... now I have Kinsler and Kendrick. I saw a trade just went through where one team traded Chase Utley to another for David Wright, leaving team A with no 2B. I'm sure he was planning to pick up Kinsler, as he's easily the top rated 2B out there, but I snaked him.6 teamer?He's still out there in my league - thinking about picking him up as a middle infield utility guy. I've got Kendrick in the 2B spot now, with Ryan Freel as a utility guy, but Stephen Drew, B.J. Upton, and Kinsler are all out there and are tempting me...WTF?
Drew and Upton were both drafted and subsequently dropped in order to pick up Sammy Sosa and Edwin Encarnacion, respectively.6 teamer?He's still out there in my league - thinking about picking him up as a middle infield utility guy. I've got Kendrick in the 2B spot now, with Ryan Freel as a utility guy, but Stephen Drew, B.J. Upton, and Kinsler are all out there and are tempting me...WTF?
Based on the latest spring lineups this would be my guess:Lofton CFKinsler 2BYoung SSTexeira 1BSosa DHBlalock 3BWilkerson LFCruz RFLaird CWe'll see what they go with tonight.Anyone know exactly where he'll be hitting in the order to start the season? It varies from source to source.
This is what I would project. Against lefties this might be altered somewhat.Based on the latest spring lineups this would be my guess:Lofton CFKinsler 2BYoung SSTexeira 1BSosa DHBlalock 3BWilkerson LFCruz RFLaird CWe'll see what they go with tonight.Anyone know exactly where he'll be hitting in the order to start the season? It varies from source to source.
Well, it's actually .29310478562But I figured .293 would be close enough for the discussion at hand.culdeus said:You guys aren't serious when you project BA to the third decimal point..293? Come on.
Nobody ever seems to want Ray Durham on their fantasy baseball team, which is why I keep getting him. Is it because he's coming off by far his career best power season? Perhaps. Is it because he's not exactly a kid and therefore unlikely to improve? Could be. Is it because most people are unaware that Durham not only produced 26 home runs and 93 RBI last year, but will again be protecting Barry Bonds in the order and could do this again? I think that's it. Not to get on another rant about how players over the age of 35 can actually still produce for your fantasy teams, but Durham sure looks like another fella being discriminated against, like Greg Maddux and John Smoltz, Jeff Kent and Chipper Jones, Jim Edmonds and that Bonds guy. There are many more. Why was that Durham season such a fluke? Sure, his previous career high in homers was 20 (back in 2001), and he hadn't topped 75 RBIs before, but times have changed. Durham was miscast for the last few seasons as a leadoff hitter, when he could no longer run and durability became an issue. But why can't he be like a Marquis Grissom type who, when the wheels slowed down, developed more power? Don't like the home park? Durham had a higher OPS in San Francisco than on the road. Think much of the power came late in the season? I'd rather see that than an early spike and poor second half. Plus, he hit 12 homers before the All-Star break, 14 after, so I wouldn't call him the second base version of Paul Lo Duca, you know. The point here is that Durham is underrated and forgotten. And since a few of the blogs I wrote on Wednesday dealt with other movement in drafts surrounding catcher and first base (just click on that little 28 on the calendar to the left), I figured second base was a good starting point today. Durham finished as the No. 4 second baseman on our Player Rater last season, behind Alfonso Soriano, Chase Utley and Dan Uggla. I understand downgrading a 35-year-old a bit, but to have 11 players at his position being drafted over him seems a bit odd, and Soriano isn't even one of them (outfielder now, folks). Uggla is going fourth at second base, 90th in ESPN average live drafts. Durham is going more than 70 picks later than Uggla and is owned in barely half of ESPN leagues. Wow. That's all I can say. Wow. And Durham's NL West pal Jeff Kent is apparently too old to produce as well. Sure, Kent is deemed as ancient, now that he's 39 years old and coming off an injury-plagued campaign. What did Kent do in 2004-05? Oh, he averaged 28 home runs and 106 RBI and hit .289 both seasons. Kent's OPS was similar last season, so I don't see why he can't get back to 28 and 106, to be honest. He is hitting cleanup for a major league team, like Durham. Is there upside? Well, if you want a good 2007 there is. Shouldn't you worry about 2008 when it gets here?
What's your problem? Are you going to state again that you were being stupid by picking on me like you did yesterday? Turn the tool factor down.wow, way to go out on a limb. why not just launch the Chase Utley bandwagon while you're at it.
Go back and read the thread. You'll see that you started this, not me. You said my opinion on Ray Durham was invalad because I like Doumit better than Paulino. Maybe I'm wrong on that one and to a degree, I'm joking as that was a shot more at JTC than it was a real prognostication. But you butted in, then continued to dinigrate my follow up posts. And I'm being a tool? Huh?For the record, I don't think you're going out on a limb projecting Kinsler to be the next great shakes at 2B. All publications like this guy. I drafted Kinsler LAST summer and enjoyed him when he was healthy. But I got him near the end of my draft. This year? I have to burn a much higher pick to get him. He's no longer a secret, so I'm not sure what this thread is for.And this is why I continue to draft Ray Durham late....people hate him. And he's going late because of it. To me, that's value. Kinsler could be a 20/20 guy this year, but you're not getting him nearly as late as a guy like Durham.I'll turn the tool factor down, but re-read the thread in question. you called me out first. Par for the course.What's your problem? Are you going to state again that you were being stupid by picking on me like you did yesterday? Turn the tool factor down.wow, way to go out on a limb. why not just launch the Chase Utley bandwagon while you're at it.
Go back and read the thread. You'll see that you started this, not me. You said my opinion on Ray Durham was invalad because I like Doumit better than Paulino. Maybe I'm wrong on that one and to a degree, I'm joking as that was a shot more at JTC than it was a real prognostication. But you butted in, then continued to dinigrate my follow up posts. And I'm being a tool? Huh?For the record, I don't think you're going out on a limb projecting Kinsler to be the next great shakes at 2B. All publications like this guy. I drafted Kinsler LAST summer and enjoyed him when he was healthy. But I got him near the end of my draft. This year? I have to burn a much higher pick to get him. He's no longer a secret, so I'm not sure what this thread is for.And this is why I continue to draft Ray Durham late....people hate him. And he's going late because of it. To me, that's value. Kinsler could be a 20/20 guy this year, but you're not getting him nearly as late as a guy like Durham.I'll turn the tool factor down, but re-read the thread in question. you called me out first. Par for the course.What's your problem? Are you going to state again that you were being stupid by picking on me like you did yesterday? Turn the tool factor down.wow, way to go out on a limb. why not just launch the Chase Utley bandwagon while you're at it.
against lefties Kinsler will be batting ninth to start the season. I really don't see that happening for long. He had the best spring of any position player for the Rangers and is ready to breakout big time.On board.This is what I would project. Against lefties this might be altered somewhat.Based on the latest spring lineups this would be my guess:Lofton CFKinsler 2BYoung SSTexeira 1BSosa DHBlalock 3BWilkerson LFCruz RFLaird CWe'll see what they go with tonight.Anyone know exactly where he'll be hitting in the order to start the season? It varies from source to source.
Hope you have room for one moreI'll keep my comfortable spot on the Barfield bandwagon, thank you.
There aren't any real legit lefthanders in the division anymore so that will help get his AB up.against lefties Kinsler will be batting ninth to start the season. I really don't see that happening for long. He had the best spring of any position player for the Rangers and is ready to breakout big time.On board.This is what I would project. Against lefties this might be altered somewhat.Based on the latest spring lineups this would be my guess:Lofton CFKinsler 2BYoung SSTexeira 1BSosa DHBlalock 3BWilkerson LFCruz RFLaird CWe'll see what they go with tonight.Anyone know exactly where he'll be hitting in the order to start the season? It varies from source to source.