In the hospital with his WR's.Where is the love for Hasselbeck?
And what WRs did he have last year when throwing 28 TDs?His leading WR was Bobby "freaking" Engram. Bobby Engram? The guy is a stud no matter who he is throwing to and Holmgren's system is a big part of why.In the hospital with his WR's.Where is the love for Hasselbeck?
3 of the 4 Seahawks' top receivers last years are either hurt and will miss at least week one this year, or are no longer with the team. That leaves Burleson as the only Seattle WR that will be healthy enough to play who's caught 15 passes in a season. I appreciate Hass's history, but at some point you have to start wondering if you aren't better off looking elsewhere.And what WRs did he have last year when throwing 28 TDs?His leading WR was Bobby "freaking" Engram. Bobby Engram? The guy is a stud no matter who he is throwing to and Holmgren's system is a big part of why.In the hospital with his WR's.Where is the love for Hasselbeck?
The RB's will be better than last year, Burleson is still young and improving and they will finally have a good pass catching TE in the rookie (Carlson....I think)And their D is great and they have a huge home field advantage.3 of the 4 Seahawks' top receivers last years are either hurt and will miss at least week one this year, or are no longer with the team. That leaves Burleson as the only Seattle WR that will be healthy enough to play who's caught 15 passes in a season. I appreciate Hass's history, but at some point you have to start wondering if you aren't better off looking elsewhere.And what WRs did he have last year when throwing 28 TDs?His leading WR was Bobby "freaking" Engram. Bobby Engram? The guy is a stud no matter who he is throwing to and Holmgren's system is a big part of why.In the hospital with his WR's.Where is the love for Hasselbeck?
Where is all the Garrard love comming from. Are you guys in leagues that give pts for handing the ball off to Freddie and MJD for td's?I don't mind:Aaron Rodgers, Garrard, Cutler, Farve, Kitna and CampbellAll those guys should allow you to be aggressive early on scooping up top Wr's and RB's
Last year, he finished 16th overall at QB in fantasy production in just 12 games. He had 18 Td's and just 3 INT's while running one in. If he plays those other 4 games, he easily throws 22, 23 td's. That puts him as a legimate QB 1 and someone you don't have to spend a high draft pick on, which is what this thread is about. If there's a matchup you don't love, then you don't feel like you have to start him since you should have a decent QB to go with him, one of the above would do.Where is all the Garrard love comming from. Are you guys in leagues that give pts for handing the ball off to Freddie and MJD for td's?I don't mind:Aaron Rodgers, Garrard, Cutler, Farve, Kitna and CampbellAll those guys should allow you to be aggressive early on scooping up top Wr's and RB's
Manning looked like he "got it" last year at the end of the season. If thats true, and I'm in the camp that thinks it is, he'll vault into a perennial top 10 guy.Funny how many are downgrading Hasselbach because his WRs are banged up, but are not doing the same for Garrard...who is much less proven and has a lower ceiling, IMO.I like Eli Manning and Schaub. Manning looked great last night, without his top two WRs...picked right up where he left off last year.
If I were to do that in my 16 teamer ~10 QB's would be off the board come my 5.02 pick:Top 4 by ADP:1) Cutler2) EManning - he may not even be there depending on how the rest of his preseason is3) Garrard4) DelhommeOther notables:* Rivers* Young* Favre - would be an interesting pick, but would be tough to time, 5.02 is too early and he probably would be taken in the next 28 picks.I am really looking at a top 4QB with my 2nd pick at 2.15 depending on who falls to me at WR; @ RB there will be nothing of value left, about 25 RB's will have been taken by then. RB's I would be looking at are: (SYoung, LWhite, JStewart, Rudi, Forte)bucsbaby said:If you go RB/RB/WR/WR in the first 4 rounds (whichever order) then someone like Big Ben or (outside chance) Carson Palmer could be there in the 5th. If not, then you'll probably have to target 2 QBs. McNabb could be one of them assuming he's healthy enough to give you 7 decent games this season. Garrard is a good QB, but who are his WRs? Cutler is probably decent to target. Favre could be part of your QBBC. I am staying far away from Hasselbeck this year.
In a 14 team league too, I see Cutler going mid-to-late 6th. He should do well this season.Hasselbeck will slide a bit due to everyone down on the WRs - nice value there.thecardiackid said:Cutler in the 7th (14 team league)
Otherwise even later w/ Leinhart (10th-11th) w/ Warner in the 13th or so.
Knowing the history of my other owners, there will be at least 4 qbs off the board before my 2nd pick. Crazy w/ 4 pt tds for qbs, but true.
Because Garrard put up those #'s with the same ragtag group and have actually improved with Porter over Wilford (by how much can be debated, but it's at least SOME improvement).Hass's security blanket in Engram is out and their WR's are going to be out longer than Porter/Williams. Hass's price is also higher than Garrard. I don't think Hass is going to completely bomb, but he's going as the QB8-9 off the board and that's just too high for me for a guy who is almost a virtual lock to NOT exceed that draft spot. Garrard is going a bit lower and, IMO, has at least a chance to outproduce that slot.Funny how many are downgrading Hasselbach because his WRs are banged up, but are not doing the same for Garrard...who is much less proven and has a lower ceiling, IMO.I like Eli Manning and Schaub. Manning looked great last night, without his top two WRs...picked right up where he left off last year.
No need to overpay for Schaub, but his value IMO comes from the following:1. While they are getting better as a franchise, they will still be behind in several games and have to throw the football.crowe1130 said:I've been planning on Roethlisberger in the 5th or Cutler in the 9thish.
Lots of love for Schaub in here. What am I missing?