Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
I can't think of one better.
85 Bears, if IF Peyton doesn't fumble they might have shut out the Pats that year.Yes that Bears team went on a nice ride.Rangers in 1994 to win the Stanley Cup (Messier's guarantee). Montreal Canadiens in 1986 (Won 7 overtime games). Bears in 85 two shutouts and a total of 10 points against in the postseason.
The what-who-where?Fo-Fi-Fo was the greatest postseason run I've ever seen by any team in any sport.
Never heard of that one?1983 76ers.The what-who-where?Fo-Fi-Fo was the greatest postseason run I've ever seen by any team in any sport.
I think that was the Sixers in '83, though I think the Lakers in 2001 was just as good.The what-who-where?Fo-Fi-Fo was the greatest postseason run I've ever seen by any team in any sport.
Never heard of that one?1983 76ers.The what-who-where?Fo-Fi-Fo was the greatest postseason run I've ever seen by any team in any sport.
Those were pretty good runs. I don't pay much attention to basketball.I think that was the Sixers in '83, though I think the Lakers in 2001 was just as good.
I'd say that's close, but beating Seattle in the Super Bowl wouldn't be like the Giants beating the Pats.I think the Steelers run in '05 was more impressive. As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams) and then beat the number 1 seed from the NFC in the Super Bowl. And they won three of the games by double digits, and the only close game (vs. Indy) wouldn't have been close had it not been for that blown call on the Manning INT.
Waiting for bitter Seattle fans to address this last point...I think the Steelers run in '05 was more impressive. As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams) and then beat the number 1 seed from the NFC in the Super Bowl. And they won three of the games by double digits, and the only close game (vs. Indy) wouldn't have been close had it not been for that blown call on the Manning INT.
True, but Pittsburgh's run through the AFC in '05 was far more impressive than the run the Giants just made through the NFC. Also, I would put the '97 Broncos into this discussion. In the AFC, they demolished the Jags at home and then won at KC and at Pitt (two of the hardest places in the NFL to win) before beating the defending champs, the Packers, in the Super Bowl.I'd say that's close, but beating Seattle in the Super Bowl wouldn't be like the Giants beating the Pats.I think the Steelers run in '05 was more impressive. As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams) and then beat the number 1 seed from the NFC in the Super Bowl. And they won three of the games by double digits, and the only close game (vs. Indy) wouldn't have been close had it not been for that blown call on the Manning INT.
Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
I voted maybe because I couldn't think of any off the top of my head but this is one.Villanova in '85.
This was the one I thought of, too, when I voted no.N.C. State, IIRC, also had an insane march Madness run one yearI voted maybe because I couldn't think of any off the top of my head but this is one.Villanova in '85.
You have to look at what conference each team was in. Pitt is in the AFC, which has been much stronger than the NFC for years, while the Giants are in the NFC. In '05, the Steelers at 11-5 were the 6 seed. In the NFC this year, the 3 seed was 10-6. That says it all about how strong the respective conferences were for these two teams to go through.Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
That is clearly a homer argument. The Steelers were 1 game better then the Giants, and the record of their opponents so far was 1 game better then that of the Giants. I don't think going to Denver and winning that game is on par with beating a 13-3 GB team in 4 degree weather. Keep in mind the Steelers knocked Carson Palmer out of the game in Cincy almost immediately, so it's silly to say they got Cincy's best punch, etc...You have to look at what conference each team was in. Pitt is in the AFC, which has been much stronger than the NFC for years, while the Giants are in the NFC. In '05, the Steelers at 11-5 were the 6 seed. In the NFC this year, the 3 seed was 10-6. That says it all about how strong the respective conferences were for these two teams to go through.Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
I am a Broncos fan, so that couldn't possibly be a homer argument. Wanna try again?That is clearly a homer argument. The Steelers were 1 game better then the Giants, and the record of their opponents so far was 1 game better then that of the Giants. I don't think going to Denver and winning that game is on par with beating a 13-3 GB team in 4 degree weather. Keep in mind the Steelers knocked Carson Palmer out of the game in Cincy almost immediately, so it's silly to say they got Cincy's best punch, etc...You have to look at what conference each team was in. Pitt is in the AFC, which has been much stronger than the NFC for years, while the Giants are in the NFC. In '05, the Steelers at 11-5 were the 6 seed. In the NFC this year, the 3 seed was 10-6. That says it all about how strong the respective conferences were for these two teams to go through.Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
Sure it is. You're trying to make the Broncos out better then they were.I am a Broncos fan, so that couldn't possibly be a homer argument. Wanna try again?That is clearly a homer argument. The Steelers were 1 game better then the Giants, and the record of their opponents so far was 1 game better then that of the Giants. I don't think going to Denver and winning that game is on par with beating a 13-3 GB team in 4 degree weather. Keep in mind the Steelers knocked Carson Palmer out of the game in Cincy almost immediately, so it's silly to say they got Cincy's best punch, etc...You have to look at what conference each team was in. Pitt is in the AFC, which has been much stronger than the NFC for years, while the Giants are in the NFC. In '05, the Steelers at 11-5 were the 6 seed. In the NFC this year, the 3 seed was 10-6. That says it all about how strong the respective conferences were for these two teams to go through.Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
You know this to be true already.. I'm guessing you were saying the same thing against the Cowboys & Packers.. I for one think this game will be a close one to say they won't win is kind of a dumb statement..We get too caught up in Ever's and Greatest of All times and it's nearly impossible to compare between sports and college sports etc....
Just sticking with football, as far as the underdog role I'd say it would up there on the list. To defeat the Cowboys after losing twice, the Packers who they lost to in week 2, beating Tampa on the road and IF they beat NE after losing to them as well, it would be difficult not to mention this in the same breath with any other teams' post season in the NFL.
The problem with all of this is that they aren't going to win and are possibly facing the best team anyone's ever seen. I guess the time to dream about this is now because after Feb. 3 it won't be talked about, the pool will be flooded with stats about NE and how they've etched themselves into history as the greatest team with the greatest season of all time.
Strike two. You are down in the count. You gonna go down swinging or looking?Sure it is. You're trying to make the Broncos out better then they were.I am a Broncos fan, so that couldn't possibly be a homer argument. Wanna try again?That is clearly a homer argument. The Steelers were 1 game better then the Giants, and the record of their opponents so far was 1 game better then that of the Giants. I don't think going to Denver and winning that game is on par with beating a 13-3 GB team in 4 degree weather. Keep in mind the Steelers knocked Carson Palmer out of the game in Cincy almost immediately, so it's silly to say they got Cincy's best punch, etc...You have to look at what conference each team was in. Pitt is in the AFC, which has been much stronger than the NFC for years, while the Giants are in the NFC. In '05, the Steelers at 11-5 were the 6 seed. In the NFC this year, the 3 seed was 10-6. That says it all about how strong the respective conferences were for these two teams to go through.Pittsburgh's opponents' records: 36-12NYG opponents' records: 35-13Add in the SB and Pitt's wins were over teams at 49-15. NYG's, if they win, would be over teams at 51-13.As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams)
I was just thinking about that.12-415-113-3Combined playoff opponent's winning percentage: .833That was a tough road.I think the '04 Pats run might have been better.
In football, I agree with this. In baseball, the Red Sox in 2004 won eight games in a row after being down 0-3 and their final three outs in the ALCS, beating two 100-win teams in the process. The White Sox also won 8 straight games in 2005.I think the Steelers run in '05 was more impressive. As the 6 seed, they beat the top 3 seeds in a very tough AFC (as opposed to the Giants beating the chump NFC teams) and then beat the number 1 seed from the NFC in the Super Bowl. And they won three of the games by double digits, and the only close game (vs. Indy) wouldn't have been close had it not been for that blown call on the Manning INT.
It would be close, and maybe the contrast to work, but there was something very special to being "Broadway Joe". Right guy, right place, right time, and his personality forged that legend as much as anything. Eli might be too low key, but personally, he may define his "legend"(IF he can win) in a different way by betraying so much of the "me first" modern athletics, by taking massive critcism in stride, and just going out and doing his business without hype, but pure efficeny. Eli will go straight to those late 90's Yankees levels of reverence if he wins THIS bowl. To slay the dragon, man, that would be something. Of course, a long road to hoe, and these guys are really cuttin the pie with the media exposure, I wish they were a little be more down to business. Its been a great run, but there's one more hill to climb, but if they climb that, they'll be NY stars for 50 years.It'll be up there. The Road to Redemption. After losing to the Cowboys twice, the Patriots twice (pre and regular season) and the Packers once, come back in the post season to beat them all for the Championship World Title after knocking off an 18-0 team. Makes for a good dramatic NFL Films story.
I'm not sure if it beats Namath's story. Could come close.
Except the post season included the three loses. Your ignoring that fact is yet another reason why New England area fans are the worst sport fans in the history of the universe.No, Red Soxs winning 8 in arow.I think they were down to the Yanks 3 games to 0.Then won 4 in arow, not sure if any other team has done that?Then 4 in arow and a sweep of St.louis.That Yank fans had to hurt.![]()
the Steelers and the Raiders are currently the only two teams to win a SB from the WC spot. NYG has a chance to be the third team to do so. but this Giants post season isn't even as exciting as their 1990 season, when we had 8 great days of NYG football, between the mauling that happened in the NFC championship game when Marshall knocked Montana out cold, and the Roger Craig fumble late in the game, the DeOssie fake punt run for the first down and the Bahr FG..and then, to go to the SB against the mighty Bills, as a 14 pt dog, and win on the last second FG attempt by Norwood, was as exciting an NFL post-season from any one team,you're ever going to find..I'll also add the 1994 NY RANGERS post season was absolutely one of the all-time great runs in the history of pro sports..the game 7 vs. NJ Devils , game 7 vs Vancouver, Pavel Bure's shot hitting the post, and within seconds NY scores...I'm a Devils fan, and I can tell you that was a GREAT post season, even as a Devils' fan. Had the Knicks ever beaten the Bulls and won a Title back in the 90's, any of those post season's would've been remarkable no doubt..and even with their losing in the Conference Championships, they still made for `OUTSTANDING , nail-biting , at the edge of your seat' sports viewing...The Mets' 1986 post season was incredible..Even if they Giants win next Sunday, I'd be VERY hesitant to say the Giants 2007/8 post-season was the best ever.I can't think of one better.
No, Red Soxs winning 8 in arow.I think they were down to the Yanks 3 games to 0.Then won 4 in arow, not sure if any other team has done that?Then 4 in arow and a sweep of St.louis.That Yank fans had to hurt.![]()
I'll also add the 1994 NY RANGERS post season was absolutely one of the all-time great runs in the history of pro sports..the game 7 vs. NJ Devils , game 7 vs Vancouver, Pavel Bure's shot hitting the post, and within seconds NY scores...I'm a Devils fan, and I can tell you that was a GREAT post season, even as a Devils' fan. Had the Knicks ever beaten the Bulls and won a Title back in the 90's, any of those post season's would've been remarkable no doubt..and even with their losing in the Conference Championships, they still made for `OUTSTANDING , nail-biting , at the edge of your seat' sports viewing...The Mets' 1986 post season was incredible..Even if they Giants win next Sunday, I'd be VERY hesitant to say the Giants 2007/8 post-season was the best ever.
St Louis was meh.The Red Sox were thought by many to be the favorite going in to the Yankee series.. then the Yankees grab a game when Schilling goes down and then Schilling comes back and grabs the game back....Up 3-0 as a Yankee fan I knew it was one game at a time and never counted it over.. Two Great teams battling mano y mano....Bottom line, it was two real good teams that were pretty equal in talent - again, I believe the Sox were favored by many and had the pitching matchups before the series....Any time that season, you could have most baseball people saying both teams were among the best 2-3 in the game.... You put the best two teams of any sport on the field together and in every single game ANY team could win it... It really never shocked me - itr sucked but, it was very possible all along with that Sox lineup and fire power.... Do the Giants have relative weapons like that????In the NFL now, you would NEVER have had anyone say the Giants are any where near the talent of the Patriots... The Giants weren't even said to be the best NFC east team.. Where are the Giants Manny and Ortiz.... Where is the Giants pitching advantage?On paper, going into the game, the Pats are HUGE favorites....I'd personally be more shocked if the Giants pull this off....... Underdogs in Dallas, Green Bay and Vs the Pats.... Talk of the best team EVER - the best Season EVER , the best QB ever... PERFECTION... SHEESH, to lose to the team and town that wanted to Fire Coughlin and Dump Eli to THIS.... No, there would never be a bigger loss or upset that this.... You can't have "The Perfect" team Vs the team that wasn't expected to make the playoffs and compare it to anything else IMO....Though the Miracle On Ice is up there as well.No, Red Soxs winning 8 in arow.I think they were down to the Yanks 3 games to 0.Then won 4 in arow, not sure if any other team has done that?Then 4 in arow and a sweep of St.louis.That Yank fans had to hurt.![]()
The sentence I bolded is not true. The '97 Broncos won the Super Bowl as a wild card entry, as did the '00 Ravens.the Steelers and the Raiders are currently the only two teams to win a SB from the WC spotI can't think of one better.
. NYG has a chance to be the third team to do so. but this Giants post season isn't even as exciting as their 1990 season, when we had 8 great days of NYG football, between the mauling that happened in the NFC championship game when Marshall knocked Montana out cold, and the Roger Craig fumble late in the game, the DeOssie fake punt run for the first down and the Bahr FG..and then, to go to the SB against the mighty Bills, as a 14 pt dog, and win on the last second FG attempt by Norwood, was as exciting an NFL post-season from any one team,you're ever going to find..
Plus they were down 0-2 and then 1-3 against Phoenix. They had no business beating the Suns.radiohead417 said:What about the 1994-1995 Houston Rockets?They beat the Jazz in 5, a STACKED suns team in 7, the Spurs in 6 and swept the Shaq/Penny Magic in the finals. That's a #3, #1, & #2 seeds in the first three rounds, then a #1 seed in the finals.
He said, "I think they were down to the Yanks 3 games to 0." That would be the three losses. The fact that they won four in a row after being down 0-3 against a team that historically owned them, and then went on to sweep a 100-win team in the WS (all in the span of ten days) is exactly why this is arguably the greatest postseason run in any sport.Go outside and take a breath, dude. There's a whole world out there.Except the post season included the three loses. Your ignoring that fact is yet another reason why New England area fans are the worst sport fans in the history of the universe.No, Red Soxs winning 8 in arow.I think they were down to the Yanks 3 games to 0.Then won 4 in arow, not sure if any other team has done that?Then 4 in arow and a sweep of St.louis.That Yank fans had to hurt.![]()
I can still remember every detail of the scene when we watched that shocker from a Galveston Hotel Room in high school.Huge, huge, huge.There are just so many examples. How can one be the best ever?Nove taking out Phi Slamma Jamma is still one of the great upsets in sport.