The "only" one Super Bowl is sometimes a convenient reason to use on a polarizing figure who had tremendous skills but made tremendously poor decisions at critical times (but I do see merit in it). I think he was a great Quarterback and had an amazing arm but I don't put him in the same class as Peyton Manning, who also has only one ring. So many of his great moments were "amazing" because they were lucky, and we don't see the highlights of the poor decisions as often. That 2009 season was just incredible, but a lot of it was chance. He had a gunslinger mentality and took chances, even when it wasn't necessary. It was part of what made him great, but it's the same reason many people won't consider him the greatest of all-time.
You can't compare him to Montana or Brady because they're so different. If you put Favre on those teams, they'd have won fewer Super Bowls. If you put Montana or Favre on Favre's teams, I can't imagine they'd win fewer than the 1 Super Bowl Favre won.
You can't compare him to Montana or Brady because they're so different. If you put Favre on those teams, they'd have won fewer Super Bowls. If you put Montana or Favre on Favre's teams, I can't imagine they'd win fewer than the 1 Super Bowl Favre won.
Last edited by a moderator: