12punch
Footballguy
the way it works is that signing bonuses almost create an inverse relationship between cash and cap.Baloney Sandwich said:Pats laid out more cash than many thought they would for McCourty, lots of reports had them balking at going to 9M a year and they exceeded that. I wonder how much of a factor is the fact that the Pats need to get to the 89% figure by the end of next season and currently are well below when making Revis an offer. Could that lead them to dropping a large amount of guaranteed money on Revis for '15 & '16? Not sure how that all works.
if nobody got signing bonuses and everybody got paid straight salary it would be very straightforward, but the bonus gets counted as cash when it's paid, and accounted for on cap over several years, so I think there's kind of been an every other year cycle of cash spending for the pats over the last few years.
if you've got cap issues you'd give a guy that 15m bonus with a 1m salary for a 4m cap hit in year 1, but if I start counting my cash spending in a year 2-5 period the 15m won't get counted in and I end up low on cash, but still carrying over 12m in cap accounting (assumed 5 yr deal).
this all just means that they just use bonuses with these guys that inflates the cash, annual average, and the guaranteed money, but keeps the actual salary and cap hits reasonable.
Last edited by a moderator: