What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Indianapolis at Seattle (1 Viewer)

Really was hoping Baldwin would miss this one and rest up. Now I need to choose between him and Richardson. Probably just roll with Dougie and hope for the best. 

 
Can't wait for someone to tell me why ratings are down because of the kneeling when really it's this dog poop of a game

 
Seemed more like 6 inches to me, and with an imperfect camera angle no way to overturn
It's not where he catches it in the air. It's where he is when he is deemed to have control. So two feet down, looked 1-2' short. Momentum is supposed to play. 

Ah well - hard to review given the camera angle I guess. 

 
:lmao: Where the H was the DB going there? Brisett was 15 yards past the LOS and he was worried about covering his man

 
It's not where he catches it in the air. It's where he is when he is deemed to have control. So two feet down, looked 1-2' short. Momentum is supposed to play. 

Ah well - hard to review given the camera angle I guess. 
He had immediate control though, so it's where he was first TOUCHED by the defender...which was while he was still in the air. FWIW...had the defender been a split second later, he would have almost certainly been short as he was moving back towards the LOS

 
He had immediate control though, so it's where he was first TOUCHED by the defender...which was while he was still in the air. FWIW...had the defender been a split second later, he would have almost certainly been short as he was moving back towards the LOS
Really? Thought he had to have both feet down.

Al Michaels even said that. 

Dis they change a rule when I wasn't looking? 

 
Really? Thought he had to have both feet down.

Al Michaels even said that. 

Dis they change a rule when I wasn't looking? 
forward progress has always been, and will always be, measured by when you get hit by the defender...where the feet land is immaterial (providerd they hit in bounds)

That said...I suspect a better camera angle would have shown him still short 6 inches or so

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmmmmm....think they gave an extra 8-10 inches there, and they got it by 3 inches

 
Had a little help on the spots, but impressive drive and TD catch nonetheless.

Is this Seattle team REALLY struggling at home with this Colts team?

 
Legion of uh, boom? 

Last week was apparently seattle's aberration. They are who we thought they were (after weeks 1-2) 

:X

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top