Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll said:
Flying V said:
I really didn't care for the book that much. It's well written, but it's basically the story of a loser that wanted to commune with nature but lacked the common sense necessary to survive. I only read it because I enjoyed Into Thin Air and Eiger Dreams so much.
Nobody starts out knowing it all. Easy to point a finger at a young man trying to find himself and lay the blame. Truth be told, and what was interesting about the book, were the extenuating circumstances surrounding his death. A lot of things went wrong, at the wrong time, for it all to fall down.I prefer to think his heart was in the right place; just made a few costly decisions.
True. But Alaska wasn't his first wilderness adventure. You'd think experience would have taught him a little more respect for the dangers involved. Either through arrogance or ignorance, he ignored advice from the more experienced and made horrendous decisions. It wasn't bad luck that lead to his demise. He was lucky to have made it that far in the first place.
He took some measures, but yeah, not enough. It said that, even after his previous experiences, he studied at a local library in Alaska before he headed out. Not that that alone changes anything, but I think he had more respect than you're giving him credit for. I just think he got too confident. I've seen your viewpoint echoed before, and it is too easily cloaked in a, "F'n idiot, didn't respect nature" thing. Makes it an easy open and shut case like that, which I don't think is fair. Some his age die making wrong decisions in a car -- I wouldn't call all of them losers. He was what, 22 or so? Kind of an invincible time, if you ask me, but no point in arguing over it. I don't want to talk about spoilers for those that haven't read it.Anyway,
to simply conclude that he was a "loser" is pretty judgmental. Too easy being the cynic. He was a good kid. Who knows where he'd be today...I would think doing better than most...pretty sure of that actually.